ipl-logo

Asylum Seekers In Australia

704 Words3 Pages

This paper will review and analyse the contemporary issue of mandatory detention of asylum seekers in Australia today. This review will provide a historical background of the treatment of these refugees, as well as taking into account the direct and indirect impacts of detention on asylum seekers from both the mental and physical health perspective.

The articles that were reviewed contained a central theme of examining the physical and mental health impacts of mandatory detention on asylum seekers. Skulan (2006) took a history background in examining asylum seekers whilst focusing on politics and International law. Newman (2013) provides an analysis of the consequences to mental health by asylum seekers being kept in mandatory detention as …show more content…

However despite this human right, peer reviewed articles indicate that there still remains a gap in public policy on the treatment of refugees in mandatory detention centres. Mandatory detention is continually used a means of processing unauthorised entrants to a country, which includes both economic migrants as well as those fleeing persecution (Skulan, 2006). It is interesting to note that for the last two decades, countries have acknowledged that detention is undesirable and may only be resorted to under certain conditions. Despite this, there is a growing number of asylum seekers detained throughout the world, and often domestic law will fail to accord with international …show more content…

Australia’s laws regulating the reception and processing of asylum seekers is very harsh and contrary to international law, particularly in comparison with small proportion of asylum seekers that arrive in Australia. This is further illustrated by referring to the treatment of asylum seekers under the old ‘White Australia Policy’ (Elder, 2003) prior to and immediately following the second world war until the 1960s. By discussing the White Australia Policy, Skulan (2006) aims to send a clear message that these beliefs are still present in today’s society, which has been considered an ‘invasion’ when discussing the feared foreign population, as discussed by the apparent threat to the national identity of Australia (McMaster, 2002). Skulan (2006) addresses the issue that most asylum seekers flee their countries because of inhumane behaviour, and many seek asylum as a last resort as persecution is a current threat. She presents this idea of people smugglers as part of a vicious cycle in that asylum seekers aren't worried about the detention facilities in Australia as it is their only chance of

Show More
Related
790 Words | 4 Pages

‘The Tampa Decision: Examining the Australian Government’s prerogative power to detain and expel unlawful non-citizens in 2001’ The executive power of the Commonwealth has largely been neglected, both by the High Court and by commentators, receiving scant attention in comparison with the Commonwealth 's legislative and judicial powers. However, it was just fourteen years ago, in 2001, when a Norwegian cargo vessel MV Tampa being denied entry into Australia after rescuing 438 asylum seekers sparked one of the most controversial yet illuminating civil cases in Australian legal history. The result was a civil suit (Ruddock vs Vadarlis 2001) in which the Federal Government successfully appealed the initial ruling to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, where it was found that the government does indeed possess a prerogative power to prevent the entry of non-citizens into

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

In Australia, refugees and asylum seekers are treated like the enemy in a war: the target of a highly resourced, military-led “deterrence” strategy complete with arbitrary detainment, detention camps, guards to terrorise them, forced deportations and the violent suppression of those who protest. Australia is failing to meet the standards required when regarding the treatment of asylum seekers. It is fact that asylum seekers make up less than 3% of Australia’s annual immigration yet the idea is being distorted to that of which they will overpopulate a country that prides itself on being a multicultural society. I want to shed light on the misconception that asylum seekers are not ‘legal’ when in actual fact it is a human right to seek freedom.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

The case of Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2013) 216 FCR 241 presents a valuable example of a real-life situation that highlights the significance of understanding and interpreting the law that applies to Australian Migration practice. The case was about whether a valid visa application has been made by the appellant in accordance with Regulations 2.10 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations) which required applications for particular visa be made at an “office of immigration” in Australia. LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE CASE: • The Minister did not consider Chen’s visa application for Class DF subclass 892 as valid because the application reached the Department’s Processing Centre one day after her existing

Read More
1384 Words | 6 Pages

The magic of symbols is that their meaning of something depends on how people interpret, use it or respond to it (Stone, 2012). The Government can use narrative stories in this particular instance and play the hero in their story as they place themselves on a pedestal for ‘saving the asylum-seekers from harm’, although the mistreatment of the asylum-seekers in the immigration centres are not much better than the country they were fleeing (Silove, Austin & Steel,

Read More
397 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction Australia is said to be a multicultural and multiracial country. So why can’t we, as a country and as a nation, say yes to immigrants fleeing from a different country? As immigration to Australia is supposably apart of our history and it would be wrong not to continue on with the actions of our ancestors. Paragraph 1 As of 2014 – 2015, Australia accepted 13,750 refugees in total. Paragraph 2 • What are refugees and asylum seekers?

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Australia has been labelled as the country of mateship, fair-go and tolerance, but the mistreatment of Asylum seekers in Australia denies these values. In our anthem we sing “For those who’ve come across the seas, we’ve boundless plains to share”. It ironic isn’t it? As when Asylum seekers arrive in Australia we do not offer a hand of mateship instead we use punitive matters such as sending them to mandatory detention, which shows how xenophobia is manifested in Australia (Ariyawansa,

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

Intro In the past year, 13,750 refugees were granted refuge in Australia, and more stories of their experiences in our country are being expressed. Though we as Australians prefer to listen to more positive stories about how impressive our refugee system is, as seen when it comes to ‘The Happiest Refugee’ and ‘Three countries, eight years," One of the most famous refugee stories, "The Happiest Refugee" by Anh Do, is a personal and humour-filled tale about Anh’s refugee experience coming from Vietnam to Australia. Though the story has a more outdated experience, with Do’s book coming out in 2010, it is hard to say that it is universal. When compared to a more recent and confronting refugee experience such as Loghman Sawari’s story, the reader

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Australia is the only country to have a system of mandatory detention where every single parent, man, woman, child who arrives here without a valid visa or illegal visa must undergo immigration detention immediately. The issue with the refugee treatment and mandatory detention in Australia is that their minds are so vulnerable and stressed after leaving their country. Detention can harm asylum seekers and refugees because they are indefinite meaning the government can detain people for the course of their life which has severe effects on a person’s emotions and wellbeing. Studies have shown that refugees who have come from a warfare filled country have and increased chance to undergo depression, self-harm and even attempt suicide when under a type of imprisonment such as immigration detention.

Read More
1546 Words | 7 Pages

As an immigrant to Australia herself, Boulos had experienced difficulties of relocation and stigmatisation that she believed were crucial cultural components to understanding applicants in migration contexts. She reflected on her time working with migrant women’s collective movements in Australia in the 1970s and 1980s and then moving on to conduct migrant related research for a number of commissions and councils after having completed her university degree in the humanities. Boulos was at many points skeptical of the role of law in providing a mechanism for good decision making, claiming that the legally trained staff often performed what she thought was ‘mindless research,’ whereas she preferred a ‘holistic approach.’ She discussed how she had done a range of work for the Premier of an Australian State and had also worked extensively in Ethnic Affairs. She discussed how she transposed a number of these experiences and the knowledge she had gained from this work into her RRT decision making to enrich her decision making.

Read More
1658 Words | 7 Pages

But at the same time, bigger number of states are trying to stop those in need of international protection to reach their territory. As a result, extraterritorial asylum processing policies gained significant weight in more industrialized countries’ asylum debate. These kind of policies can be described as initiatives aimed

Read More
1266 Words | 6 Pages

citizen, but unlike U.S. citizens, migrants must suffer from being placed in detention. The issue being raised here is that even though there are many aspects that merge the two together, there can be an overlap at times that has negative impacts. In criminal law, defendants have multiple rights that they are entitled to, but this isn’t the case for migrants. Migrants that are being held in detention awaiting their trials must defend themselves because, even though they are being treated as criminals, the rights of a criminal don’t pass over to them. The article written on crimmigration conveys that “Noncitizens in immigration proceedings do not enjoy the protections of the Eighth Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment.

Read More
1468 Words | 6 Pages

This comprehensive annotated bibliography discusses about the poor mental health of the refugees and asylum seekers under detention in developed countries. This sits within the “Social Work Practice in Mental Health” and “Social Work with Refugee Survivors of Torture and Trauma” categories of Social Work fields of practice (Alston and McKinnon, 2005) and uses sources from Australian publications on these issues. The sources cited suggest that due to the large number of refugees and asylum seekers, governments of developed countries have implemented policies to deter people from seeking asylum such as immigration detention policies, strict visa restrictions, rigorous border checks and the stopping of voyages of vessels suspected of carrying smuggled asylum seekers (Silove et al. 2000). The refugees and asylum seekers go through tremendous amount of mental suffering and the worst affected are small children and adolescents.

Read More
1120 Words | 5 Pages

The more powerless and vulnerable the individual, the more significant their ethical claim. Since each person, paying little respect to one's lawful status or geographic area, has a transcendent dignity that must dependably be regarded, individuals progressing ought to appreciate the full scope of human rights, and others have an obligation to see that they are regarded, secured and satisfied. "Refugees and asylum seekers are humans, and should enjoy the whole range of human rights. Unless there are compelling reasons to believe that refugees or asylum seekers represent a serious danger to the common good, they should not be interned. Furthermore they should have access to work and thus the opportunity to fulfil their duty to contribute to the common good” (Australians Human Rights Commission, 2014).

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

The number of such asylum seekers is rapidly growing—the European Union faced a 365% increase in the number of refugees seeking asylum from 2013 (60,000) to 2014 (219,000) (Sunderland, pg. 1). Over 22,000 migrants have died in the treacherous waters due to lack of proper vessels—many migrants travel by raft across the sea (Sunderland, pg. 2). Unfortunately, the European Union was ill equipped to deal with the passage of so many migrants. Until early 2015, the European Union was focused on only preventing such departures, though many migrants had already started to land on European land by this time (Sunderland, pg. 23).

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

The current refugee crisis is accelerating every day more and more, with countries such as Syria still being at civil war. It is one of the most basic principles of the EU to provide these asylum seekers with the possibility to seek asylum in its territory. As it has become clear from the chapters above, the Dublin system does not work as well as it was wanted to. The border countries of the EU bear most of the responsibility over the asylum seekers as other Member States are left with only a handful of refugees; asylum seekers apply asylum in another Member State than in the one they have been assigned to; and the rights of refugees continue to be at jeopardy even after they have successfully fled from the armed conflict, civil war or oppression and sought asylum inside the borders of the EU. In order to have asylum seekers’ human rights in line with international standards, there must be fair and efficient system that distributes the responsibility between the Member States of the EU.

Read More

More about Asylum Seekers In Australia

Related Topics

Open Document