Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the
Sack states a fact when he says, “In 1957, after years of intense internal debate, the NCAA caved under pressure to subsidize athletes, and voted to allow athletic scholarships” (Sack). This tells the audience that at some point in time, athletic scholarships were not allowed, but were strictly academic. The author begins with how the NCAA officially let scholarships be awarded but later in the article he says that, over time, they have turned into more of an “employment contract” (Sack). The author also states “Because they are already essentially paid to play, they deserve the same rights and benefits as other employees, including medical benefits, workers' compensation when injured, and the right to use their God-given talents to build some financial security for their families while still in college” (Sack).
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
“Play for the name on the front of jersey, not the back.” A popular quote for sports players. What does it mean? Anyone who’s seen any sports game with a team uniform would know that the team name is located on the top of the front side of the jersey and the player’s last name goes on the top of the backside of the jersey. So, the quote means play for your team and not for yourself.
Being a college athletes take full time dedication and participation in regular classes. When you have the privilege of attending such universities, and colleges you are only representing the bests. That means, when you graduate, you will have of the best support and scholarships that you can possibly achieve. This situation mostly only applies to the students who attend the fanciest universities, and colleges. Some scholarships may seem like a lot money, but cover only the mysterious, housing, tuition, fees, meal-plan, multiple hundred-dollars textbooks and unknown fees.
Scholarships and recruiting have been around as early as the 1880s, when football went from a fun backyard family game, to a popular, profitable sport. Scholarships were funded by school’s fraternities, and the ultimate goal was to motivate players to take their game to the next level. Along with scholarships taking place, The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was introduced in 1906. According to the article “History of Sports Scholarships”, the NCAA instilled rules to protect the student athlete from exploitation, meaning that the athlete shall not be paid in any way for their talent. In his ESPN article,
( quote taken from here. ) This shows a lifestyle change within the student-athlete. Which for the school is not good as they already funded their own money towards the athlete to provide them with a full-ride scholarship toward the
College athletes are not receiving a physical paycheck; instead they are receiving a scholarship that is worth much
although athletes work tough from day to night time every day they can’t preserve on making a living for something they may be getting to know for or their future dreams, and because of this, college athletes need to now not receives a commission because there need to be equality, or in any other case it will purpose issues with different fields and organizations too. For colleges to be a fair place every class needs to give the same education without making it more valuable, and this is for everyone's future to be better! For our school to not end up in additional costs we should not expect something like this from our universities. Don’t overlook athletes' needs and passion for them to clearly get what they deserve in the long
Speech 1 Pro - College Athletes should be paid a stipend on top of their scholarship Yes I absolutely think that their should be a bill so that college athletes can be paid a stipend on top of their scholarship. This is because it will help them get food if their really hungry, gas money if they drive and in case of an emergency if they get hurt. “There are hungry nights that I go to bed starving,” said former University of Connecticut star Shabazz Napier. This bill will affect many american college athletes around the entire country because their are a lot of college athletes out here trying to survive on their own because they are living on campus right now and not with their own loving parents to support them any longer.
While some believe that athletes should have their own choice at making a decision to go pro straight out of high school, they should not do so because they will not be able to manage their million dollar contracts respectively. Speaking of contracts, the NBA should eliminate guaranteed contracts for rookies drafted in the first round of the NBA draft. They should do this because a careless high school kid, could just go into the draft not knowing, or caring on how much they are going to make, with the lack of experience on handling millions of dollars. This is very unrepsonsibible for a teenager, and not only for the high school athlete, but also for the basketball association as well. This is because of there noncommitment to have these players
“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.
When student-athletes received full scholarships, they should be privileged and thankful since the cost of higher education is very expensive. Student-athletes need to understand the circumstances and take of advantage of getting their degree from a well renowned university since the percentages are very slim to none on having a professional career in sports. The purpose of a student-athlete is to be a student first and then an athlete second. The main focus should be on earning a degree, and not worrying about when is the next game on the schedule. Many people are stating that college athletes should get paid, but how about the general student body that has little to nothing and working a job earning minimal pay.
B. While some athletes do get compensation that only lasts while they are eligible to play. Joe Nocera columnist for the New York Times Magazine points out, “College athletes are routinely tossed aside, too – after they have used up their athletic eligibility.” Many athletes need more time to complete their degrees because of the hours
