ipl-logo

Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

840 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Athletic scholarships pros and cons

College sports are a major part of American culture. College athletes devote hours upon hours a week to their sports training, but unfortunately, sports can take up a lot of time and distract from other important activities. This can harm academics, as athletes have to balance sports and academics, especially at a college. Participating in sports is almost like working a part-time job and having to balance school too which can be difficult to do, and focus may be rendered on one task and not both. Furthermore, athletes will be on scholarships too, which is why college athletes should not be paid. As a start to things, something that may not pop out to most people when lingering on the topic is how each college athlete would have to be paid …show more content…

Research.com has listings under the cons of paying college athletes. One reason paying college athletes would not work is the fact that most college sports fans are almost guaranteed to pick between the sports of men's and women's basketball and football. So with those three sports being the cream of the crop. They draw in the most attention and also the most revenue for the school by being broadcast on television and other things like ticket sales and many other things. So if basketball is for both men and women with the addition of football being the money maker for schools the student-athletes that participate in those sports would be receiving the most amount of money. And for the other sports a school would have to offer would be getting the leftovers from what the ¨Main event¨ sports and the student-athletes …show more content…

So receiving thousands of dollars could lead to many different distractions from academics. Especially if balancing sports and academics is already hard enough. The NCAA states in an interview with The Chicago tribune that college athletes already earn endorsement deals and other contracts, and tend to study less that is not the only reason the NCAA has brought to be against college athletes being paid. In the same Chicago Tribune interview, the NCAA states that if an ¨athlete was being paid and it significantly changed their lifestyle," NCAA President Mark Emmert testified in a previous federal antitrust case, "they probably would not be living in a residence hall. They probably would not be eating in the cafeteria, they probably would not be as — as active a member or participant in the life of a campus." ( quote taken from here. ) This shows a lifestyle change within the student-athlete. Which for the school is not good as they already funded their own money towards the athlete to provide them with a full-ride scholarship toward the

Show More
Related
1918 Words | 8 Pages

This point, the author brings up another reason why athletes should not be paid. The athletes should not be able to take a salary from their universities profit. Players feel they are “employees” to the university they are attending, but they are just student athletes who do not deserve to be paid (Bowen, 2014). Many students at any university have a job to help pay for their schooling.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

More than half of student-athletes already get financial aid as well, and a good majority of them don’t even need it. If athletes began receiving salaries on top of what they already get, the regular price of college tuition could skyrocket (Wood). In the end, these student-athletes already are gaining tens of thousands of dollars during their college careers along with having the chance at getting a college education. This sounds like plenty enough of earning opportunities for a

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

College Athletics: Why Students Should Not be Paid to Play The debate is on whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. Over half of the American voters believe athletes should be paid, especially football and basketball players, with all the money the NCAA brings in during March Madness, New Year’s games, and college playoffs. However, thoughts of college athletes being paid digresses away from the entire purpose of going to college as student-athletes. Paying college athletes to play would just lead to further financial issues within the NCAA program.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

Oftentimes when watching a sports program such as Sportscenter or Outside the Lines one question that is hotly debated is that of whether or not college athletes should be paid. Along with already receiving free college, paying these athletes would be very hard to control. Critics may ask; what sports get paid? who gets paid what? And how will school afford to pay these athletes?

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

although athletes work tough from day to night time every day they can’t preserve on making a living for something they may be getting to know for or their future dreams, and because of this, college athletes need to now not receives a commission because there need to be equality, or in any other case it will purpose issues with different fields and organizations too. For colleges to be a fair place every class needs to give the same education without making it more valuable, and this is for everyone's future to be better! For our school to not end up in additional costs we should not expect something like this from our universities. Don’t overlook athletes' needs and passion for them to clearly get what they deserve in the long

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

Advocates for the NCAA claim that student athletes should not get paid because academics come first and sports are extra-curricular activities. However, the statistics do not back up the NCAA’s core values. For example, the NCAA Basketball Tournament requires up to 6 missed classes, many nationally televised games are played on weeknights, and this year the Florida State football team missed the first day of spring classes due to the national championship. Obviously, the NCAA is very concerned with the education of student athletes but it also seems as if the NCAA puts increasing revenue and publicity ahead of the importance of

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

"(Nagel) The article also argues that paying college athletes would change the nature of college athletics, as it would shift the focus from education to athletics. "The fact is that college sports are a part of the educational experience and the focus on athletics should never be at the expense of education,"(Nagel) he says. Overall, Nagel suggests that paying college athletes would create more problems than it would solve, and that the current system of scholarships and educational opportunities is the best way to compensate college

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Collegiate sports produce a lot of money from the students who play for them. These students only and for that reason College athletes should be paid outside of scholarships because the college sports industry makes a large amount of money, and these athletes invest a lot of time and risk into their sport, along with the fact that if athletes were paid they could afford their education. Athletes should be able to make money from the sport they play because with the amount of hours they put in there isn’t for them to do school work and have a job .Colleges profit about $27 billion dollars or more annually from their athletics (Article name). In the past twelve years the amount of attention and money generated by football and basketball has

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

One very controversial topic in college sports over the past few years is whether or not college athletes should get paid (Link) College athletes should not get paid to play Not only are there strict rules and violations within the NCAA, but adding a salary would negatively alter the mindset of many student-athletes in college The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is a non-profit association which regulates the majority of college athletes. If the NCAA decides to pay players then it will cause problems within the sporting industry. Including title IX violations, and difficulty with distribution of money among athletes.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The Argument Against Paying College Athletes The justification of attending college is to acquire professional training and skills, so why should college athletes be compensated? Paying college athletes more than the scholarships they already have is not a good idea. Even though college athletes should be paid because they don't have time to work, they shouldn't be paid because it could send a negative message to kids and high school students and they already got paid through their tuition, fees, and transportation. While it may inspire more children to participate in sports, it may also convey a negative message and misunderstand why they should do so.

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

In today 's life college athletes are not pleased because they don’t get any compensation at all from their sport they are playing. There is a lot of similarities between professionals players and college athletes players like to broadcast of their games, they both can seen on the Tv or media. They both let people know the intense game that the players play, which gives the people a lot of excitement and grabs the people attention to pay for a ticket. Does it affect the college athlete to not get paid at all? Well according to some experts, it does because athletes need that money to pay college tuitions, to buy books, to pay apartment rent, etc.

Read More

More about Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Open Document