ipl-logo

Essay On Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

1074 Words5 Pages

Did you know that the NCAA supplies college student-athletes with over 3.6 billion dollars worth of scholarships each year? Despite this equitable form of compensation for playing a sport of their desire, so many people nationally believe these athletes should be paid a yearly salary! In this essay, reasons will be given to you as to why these colleges should not pay their athletes. There are so many facts and statistics in which all couldn’t be included, but there is still a plethora of information backing these athletes not being paid. College student-athletes should not be paid a salary by their colleges because they do not bring in all the money and attention as it’s perceived, they can already make money off of their name, image, and likeness …show more content…

Players, as well already earn money off of their NIL (Name, Image, Likeness). On top of the NIL earnings, they can sign with agents and school boosters, adding to the money they can make anyway, without salaries (Should). Because they can make money in this way, the colleges shouldn’t be liable for paying the big-name athletes even more (Should). The NCAA already provides 3.6 billion dollars worth of scholarships to over 180,000 athletes. This results in roughly 20,000 dollars to each student receiving a scholarship while the average total cost to attend college is only 18,000 dollars (Should). More than half of student-athletes already get financial aid as well, and a good majority of them don’t even need it. If athletes began receiving salaries on top of what they already get, the regular price of college tuition could skyrocket (Wood). In the end, these student-athletes already are gaining tens of thousands of dollars during their college careers along with having the chance at getting a college education. This sounds like plenty enough of earning opportunities for a …show more content…

These athletes are awarded a cheap or sometimes close to a free opportunity to gain this education, so they should take advantage of it. If athletes began being paid salaries, schools with more money and more payment opportunities would strongly affect where the big-name athletes would go (Wood). I’ll even give an example of this from a different source. Suppose an athlete was choosing a school for their sport and they were between North Carolina or Harvard. An everyday athlete would choose North Carolina in a heartbeat. But suppose players were getting paid salaries and Harvard offered more money. This could completely change the athlete’s path of where they want to go to college all because of money (Essay). The highest likelihood to go pro in any college sport is that of baseball at about 10%. A majority of this 10% won’t even make it to the MLB where the real earning is done. The chances of earning a degree are much higher and set them up for a great future. Focusing on the schooling part more than trying to earn money in college would be much more beneficial for these student-athletes (Should). Of all undergraduate students, athletes receiving some kind of compensation (scholarships, financial aid, etcetera) graduated with a degree 5% of the time more than non-athletes. This shows that without having to worry about any kind of money students are in a better environment to succeed and set themselves up for

Show More
Related
1344 Words | 6 Pages

A common argument for why these athletes should be paid is that they are generating revenue for the school. Even though the athletes generate money for their school most of it is used to support the programs generating the revenue by providing the scholarships that are bringing in the top recruits to the school in the first place. That doesn’t even factor in the medical and travel expenses, free gear, top-notch coaching, unlimited use of elite athletic facilities and a national stage to audition for a job in the professional ranks (Dirlam). Many college athletes are being reimbursed with nearly as much money as the average American makes per year through their scholarships and extra amenities (Dirlam). Another argument that was seen in an online article was that it would not change the quality of top schools through the payment of players (Peebles).

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes may forget that their main purpose at school is to learn and study, not to receive money. Finally, if you pay college athletes it would take money away from college budgets that could be used to invest in research, to hire better staff, or to renovate facilities and technology. If colleges are going to invest more money in a program, it should be in academics,

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

College athletes today are being paid for their name, image, and likeness and it has become a great source of debate considering most of these athletes are already on scholarship. Many people and colleges around the country are debating whether or not college athletes should be paid NIL and other things. NIL money is money that college and sometimes high school athletes are being paid to use their identity to help schools, brands, and more. Some colleges and experts suggest it is only right to pay college athletes because they are using their name, image, etc. to make money, so they should be paid. But, some people think that college athletes shouldn’t be paid because it is hurting college sports and it is very reckless.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

While this is true, most college athletes try their best to get to the professional level, not all college athletes make it to the next level. Those that know that their chances in playing professionally are not high might not be inclined to always put forth maximum effort. A little extra incentive in the form of compensation would encourage maximum effort from all athletes all the time. Paying these athletes can only increase the effort, and therefore competition, in their respective

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Paying athletes would lead to a better education for them because they would worry less about trying to survive without an actual job. It would also allow the athletes the ability to go on vacations if they received a monthly stipend. This is necessary for student-athletes because they have the constant stress of trying to become better than their opponents. Scholarships alone are not sufficient to support student-athletes, so they need to receive an actual pay to account for the time they

Read More
1579 Words | 7 Pages

College athletics is a core part of society, especially the colleges. Colleges themselves make a lot of money off of their college athletes, however, they do not treat them with the same respect. College athletes face terrible obstacles in their life balancing both their athletics and academic life. These problems lead to the debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid, to lessen the burden of college life. Throughout time, there has been an ongoing debate about whether or not college athletes should be paid to play.

Read More
1921 Words | 8 Pages

There have been a few questions that has been asked for a long time regarding why certain things don’t happen, but the main one is rather student-athletes should be paid or not. I believe that student- athletes should be paid for what they do for the school. Even though the student-athletes are given scholarships for their skill, there are some who wound up giving the college more money than the money that is equal to their scholarship. People may think then why should you give money to the lesser athletes who don’t contribute as much to the prestige of the school, but if you just paid certain individual it would be the same as it is now. By that it means it would basically be the same as athletes getting paid by others to go to the school or just to have money to walk around with while in college.

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

College Athletes Should Not Recieve Payment College student-athletes should be paid, right? Maybe not. As an athlete, I put in 3 or more hours of work daily for my sport, from practice, training, and watching film. I do all this for the love of the game, not so that one day I can go to college and compete to get paid the highest and have that be my main focus rather than my development as a player. Being paid would bring conflict to sports people once loved.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

Do you ever wonder if its fair that college athletes bring in billions of dollars to their schools and to the NCAA, but they don't receive any money at all? The topic of whether to pay college athletes or not has been a trending topic for quite some time. The major question is, should these athletes be receiving more than just a scholarship? Imagine being a NCAA athlete and seeing a jersey with your name and number is selling in the stores for over $100, and it might even be bringing in more revenue than most professional sports jerseys, and not receiving any sort of compensation. This is a problem that that a lot of college athletes in today's world are facing.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

II. Athletes are already paid through scholarships and should be going to college primarily for an education. A. In a USA Today College article, points out that athletes are already paid through scholarships, experience and education (Marshall, Blake).

Read More

More about Essay On Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Open Document