ipl-logo

Retributivist Theory Of Retribution

835 Words4 Pages

arrested and successfully prosecuted and punished is smaller than what advocates of this theory would prefer it to be.
Retribution
Retribution involves the payment of a debt to both the victim and society and thus atonement for the person’s crime. Historically retribution was encapsulated in terms like “getting even”, “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”. Retribution literally mean paying back the offender for wrongs he or she did. It is based on the idea that victims are entitled to reprisal.
When a crime occurs society is also affected therefore retribution demands that society be paid (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2007).
Revenge theory
Revenge can be describes as both as emotion and an act in response to victimization. Victims sometimes feel as though an injury or insult requires punishment in return. When this feeling is acted upon it is revenge.
Incapacitation Theory
Supporters of the incapacitation theory believe that offenders should be prevented from committing further crimes either by temporary or …show more content…

Unlike theories that are primarily concerned with preventing future offenses This theory of sentencing lessens the emotional component of revenge by claiming that criminal acts are deserving of punishment, that offenders morally blameworthy and that they must be punished (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2007). Advocates of this theory state that punishment should be proportionate to the seriousness of the offense committed. In this way desert restores the moral balance to a society wronged by crime. Andrew von Hirsch, a leading proponent of the just deserts model identified the rationales underlying criminal punishment says that when someone “infringes on the rights of others, he deserves blame and that is why the sanctioning authority is entitled to choose a response that expresses moral disapproval namely punishment”. From a desert point of view justice requires that punishment be imposed on offenders of

Show More
Related
1066 Words | 5 Pages

Revenge is prevalent in society as well in literature. It is also a common topic for Hollywood movies. Revenge is the action of inflicting harm on someone for a wrong suffered at their hands.

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

Revenge is an emotional response to real or imagined injury or insult which requires punishment in return. This is done more on feeling than by law. The second goal is retribution (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). Retribution involves the payment of a debt to both the victim and society. The way this is explained is an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

Death Penalty is a very ominous punishment to discuss. It is probably the most controversial and feared form of punishment in the United States. Many are unaware, but 31 of the 52 states have the Death penalty passes as an acceptable punishment. In the following essay, I will agree and support Stephen Nathanson's statement that "Equality retributivism cannot justify the death penalty. " In the reading, "An Eye for an Eye?", Nathanson gives objections to why equality retributivism is morally acceptable for the death penalty to be legal.

Read More
1521 Words | 7 Pages

Revenge and justice truly are used as powerful motives; however, when stopping to think about actions while excluding emotional involvement, the cycle can always be

Read More
1455 Words | 6 Pages

Revenge can be a horrible emotion; it can sometimes lead people to do horrible things. By definition, Revenge means to get retribution for a wrongdoing done to you. In my opinion, revenge is mostly caused by fear and the overwhelming feeling of payback Throughout history, revenge, or vengeance, has been altered by several cultures and religions, and even the American culture. Though it often leads one to perform criminal acts, Howard argues that it is a necessary component in the functioning of society. He points out that revenge is a threat that acts as a disincentive to undeserved violence.

Read More
2486 Words | 10 Pages

Revenge is often seen as a primal instinct that is given a negative connotation. A desire that burns within us when we have been wronged. But is it morally correct to act on this desire for revenge? A question like this is pondered by philosophers and seekers of knowledge, and it remains a disputable topic today. At its core, revenge is the act of seeking retribution for a wrong that has been inflicted upon us.

Read More
1782 Words | 8 Pages

Through the decades, crime and crime control have been analyzed in an attempt to find the causes of crime and decide how to combat them. The United States showed an increase in their prison population in the 1970s when the country turned towards a more punitive justice system. Referred to as just deserts theory of crime, the aim is to inflict as much pain on the offender through harsh prison sentences, in hopes to cause as much pain as the crime they committed. The worse the crime is, the worse the punishment the criminal will endure. The issue surrounding just deserts theory is the vast amount of offenders who return to prison after being released, also known as the recidivism rate.

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

Philosopher of Science, Francis Bacon writes of well know public revenges that have been justified over time, “Public revenges are for the most part fortunate; as that for the death of Caesar; for the death of Pertinax; the death of Henry the Third of France; and many more.” (Bacon, lines 24-26). These public revenges, along with most public revenges, lead to a better era for the community that sought revenge causing their actions to be justified. One main example is Caesar of Rome, although his death was at the time unpopular it lead to a better government and the being of the Empire. Revenge that takes place under the law for the people can be justifiable because this said revenge, in the long, allows the people to live free and prosperous

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

The attractiveness of this theory is primarily based on the ethical code that Hampton subscribes to, which is that pain-inflicted punishments should not be condoned when it comes to disciplining wrongdoers. Rather, constructive analysis done pertaining to why certain actions are morally wrong in society would be intellectually stimulating and productive for both the wrongdoers and the public, all while avoiding the infliction of physical pain. Compared to the retributivist argument, which circulates around the idea that the purpose of punishment is to make wrongdoers pay for their misdeeds, and that they should be treated the way that they have treated others, the MET is a more humane way to treat wrongdoers, and in the long run, would perhaps help them emerge from confinement as better citizens within society, rather than as potential repeat offenders. Therefore, the appeal of the MET stems from the positive implications of treating wrongdoers with respect and dignity, all while teaching them why their actions were wrong while simultaneously instilling positive and moral values in their psyche before allowing them to re-enter

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

The aim of the punished was mainly to retribution, in which it termed to be an impact of what mattered to be the return of a wrongful act (Cunningham, 2015). For incapacitation, whereby it was a way of warning the rest of the community to retrieve or not to attempt in repeating a similar crime, typically or physically restricting them. With deterrence, this means as a way of discouraging others from committing the same

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

Deterrence Theory A special case of the rational choice theory is the deterrence theory, which emphasizes the costs of legal sanctions (Liska & Messner, 1999). While the rational choice theory was initially applied to the field of economics, and considered all costs, the deterrence theory was initially applied to the field of law and only considered legal costs. Accordingly, as a deterrent for committing crime, increasing the severity of punishment, increasing the certainty of punishment, and increasing the celerity of punishment will all increase the legal costs for committing crime and, consequently, decrease the benefits versus cost ratio. Furthermore, there is a specific deterrence and a general deterrence (Barkan, 2006).

Read More
3040 Words | 13 Pages

CHAPTER 4 SOCIETY AND REVENGE In general Revenge is a harmful action against a person or group in response to a injustice, It is also called payback, retribution, retaliation or vengeance; it may be characterized as a form of justice an unselfish action which enforces society or moral justice away from the legal system. And in the function of society, Social psychologist Ian Mckee says the desire for the sustenance of power motivates vengeful behavior as a means of impression management: "People who are more vengeful tend to be those who are motivated by power, by authority and by the desire for status; the passion for revenge is strong and sometimes almost shocking. But our natural logic about revenge is often cruel, conflicted, narrow, and dangerous. Revenge is a primitive, destructive, and violent response to anger, injury, or humiliation.

Read More
2091 Words | 9 Pages

The disadvantage of this approach is the fact that it does not focus on the victim instead it justifies the offender’s actions by regarding them as patients and victims of dysfunctional societies Restitution

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.

Read More

More about Retributivist Theory Of Retribution

Related Topics

Open Document