ipl-logo

Attorney Client Priviledge Case Study

882 Words4 Pages

The issue is whether the attorney-client privilege will protect Jack’s communication to Beverly when he was not a formal client of hers and Freddie eavesdropped on their entire conversation.
The attorney-client privilege is an evidentiary rule that excludes otherwise relevant and admissible evidence and is therefore narrowly construed. It encourages full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients. The privilege protects only communications; it does not protect the underlying facts pertinent to the representation. Five elements must be established for the attorney client privilege to apply: (1) the relation of attorney and client existed at the time the communication was made; (2) the communication was made in confidence; (3) the …show more content…

An attorney-client relationship can be formed in 3 ways: (1) by consent, (2) through court appointment, or (3) through the client’s reasonable belief. To form the relationship through the client’s reasonable belief, the client has to possess the thought of the attorney is going to represent him or her in their legal matters. Some factors that might incorporate this belief are the length of time or place of the meeting between the client and lawyer, sophistication of client, whether there was payment involved, the exchanging of confidential information, any legal advice or services given by the attorney, or if there were any legal documents exchanged. Here, the attorney-client relationship was not formed by reasonable belief of Jack, because Jack was not Beverly’s client, Adelia was. Since Beverly was Adelia’s lawyer for her divorce, this is probably why Jack went to her and not for the purpose of becoming a client of Beverly. Also, there was no fee paid by Jack for the consultation and the conversation was not that long. Therefore, there was no attorney-client relationship formed between Jack and

Show More
Related
96 Words | 1 Pages

Jonathan, I agree with you completely that the only oral contract she needs to honor is the one with the attorney. The oral contracts with Hermes and the builder fall under the statue of frauds and would not be legally enforceable. Suzy does have to honor her oral contract with the attorney because the attorney performs the service of investigating the title and records associated with the land within the one year limit and informs Suzy of the information that has been found about the land. The oral contract with the attorney would be legally enforceable.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

The Company will also advance its own online website showcasing the paralegal operations of the business. Miss. Reid will also contact lawyers/paralegals, and law firms in respects to developing continuing associations for their legal documentation needs. 5.3 Pricing Miss.

Read More
1983 Words | 8 Pages

The lawyer was assigned to “protect” Jefferson yet the attorney showed a clear image throughout the court scene that he does not care about the man one way or the other. For example, when the attorney describes Jefferson as “A thing to hold the handle of a plow, a thing to load your bales of cotton, a thing to dig your ditches, to chop your wood, to pull your corn,” (Gaines pg: 7) proves that the attorney does not have a desire to really help

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

Also paragraph (1) of this rule states “the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client” (Del. Pg. 7). A specific event that this rule applies to in the movie would be the fact that simply Vinny cannot truthfully believe that he can represent both clients with “competent and diligent representation.” This is because this is his first true trial case. He lacks both knowledge as well as experience. Another key issue in this movie that goes along with Rule 1.7 is truly the fact of conflict of interest between Billy

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

FACTS All states and lawyer depend on state laws, Supreme Court ethics, legal ethics opinions and other stated regulation. Recently, the Supreme Court of Virginia declined the adoption of carefully formulated formal rule governing its paralegals. They were the proposed regulations that provided an imperative compendium of paralegals ‘pros and cons’.

Read More
320 Words | 2 Pages

This remains said, concerning the lawyer, since he never did it for the money, preferably, he stood for those who were miss treated and couldn’t afford a competent lawyer.

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

The rule ensures that the information that is exchanged by the attorney and client is confidential and that it’s not presented in court or to anyone else. The issue that arises is how a lawyer can represent the client fairly when a notice

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Other times, however, this breakdown is due to the clients unrealistic expectations. If you are the prospective incoming attorney, before accepting this type of client, a client who fired their previous attorney, you must sufficiently investigate and determine the reason for the previous attorney-client breakdown. Your due diligence could save you from a malpractice claim. Experienced attorneys

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

Ada Caines is not in agreement with the wishes of her mother’s decision. Ada Caines is questioning her Mildred M.’s chose in the validity of a power of attorney and health care proxy on behalf of her and insinuating that her mother was incapacitated at the time of signing, because she wanted to be appointed her guardian. Ada has to prove that Mildred M. was a subject of undue influence by her physician, nurse practitioner and grandson at the time of signing a power of attorney and health care proxy. However, this appears to be fair and free from undue influence, because the testimony does not show that Mildred M. lacked sufficient

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

This article explores the rise of marginalization of legal aid lawyers due to the factors of ideological, task, status, and material marginality and how poverty lawyers search for ways to cope with such marginalized situation. The authors claim that there are different types, mechanisms, and consequences of being poverty lawyers and those factors can be seen as “the routinization of legal aid”, high level of personal interaction, low compensation rate, being seen as less qualified professionally by the private firm and corporate lawyers, socio-political environment, and restriction on class action lawsuits. To support their claims, the authors make use of the replication as a methodology technique to understand the how certain changes in the

Read More
1766 Words | 8 Pages

The paralegal knows how her best friend drives, so when the neighbor makes accusations, it’s a conflict of interest because the paralegal might not agree of such. B. According to the “ABA Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Paralegal Services,” what steps can be taken in a law firm to create an effective screen in conflicts cases where the paralegal herself/himself has the conflict? Specify what precautions the law firm can take to screen the paralegal from the case in which the paralegal has a conflict. Identify and cite to the guideline and/or comment in these guidelines which govern this matter.

Read More
1674 Words | 7 Pages

Definition and Description of Procedural Justice Procedural justice is the act involved in decision making. It incorporates the process of involving transparency and fairness in making decisions. The incorporation of justice in this process is equally essential it entails that all parties allowed to give their views before decision are made concerning a given matter. Some theories state that restorative and distributive justice might not be met but for as long as there is a fair and justice procedure, there is always the possibility of having outcomes that are equitable (Jason &Tyler, 2003).

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

Nor does it apply to any fact observed by the lawyer after he has been instructed to showing that a crime or fraud has been or is being committed. The statutory exceptions to the “without prejudice” rule might be extended to mediator confidentiality as a matter of public interest. As an independent third party outside the lawyer/client relationship, the mediator may have a public duty to report certain communications, e.g., evidence of threats and

Read More
204 Words | 1 Pages

I completely agree with you Linda the more information you gather on the client the better it is to handle their case. From a sociological stand point family dynamics, socioeconomic structure play a very important role in in how the client will act. Peter Blau ( a sociology theorist ) discussed power and rewards through social exchange. The process of exchange can be and should be an equal one, with equal rewards; however, if there is an imbalance in power discrepancies are created. If this happens then a client may lose trust, Hence the importance of communicating everything.

Read More

More about Attorney Client Priviledge Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document