ipl-logo

Australian Consumer Law Case Summary

434 Words2 Pages

The consumers has complete right against the distributor for the purpose and quality they have mentioned for their product ( Under part 2-5 of Australian Consumer law, ACL). The term manufacturer doesn't mean that it should be the actual manufacturer alone, it also includes the distributor and other entities.

For example, the importer is also included as a manufacturer and has equal right as that of the manufacturer. Both of them guarantees that the goods that they produce are of acceptable quality, have been accurately described, satisfy any manufacturer's expressed warranty, have parts and repair facilities reasonably available in reasonable time.

Breach of these, if it is minor problem, seller can choose the remedy whether to refund or …show more content…

The amount payable for such goods should not exceed $40000(ACL).

There has been a breach of the consumer guarantee regarding the quality of the Bonsoy soy milk. Misleading the consumers regarding quality, grade, formula (ACL part 3-1). According to ACL Part 3-5, liability for safety defective goods, manufacturer shouldn't have ignore the fact of maximum limit of iodine that a soy milk should contain. A glass of soy milk contained 50 times more than a normal consumption of iodine content.

Maruson who is the manufacturer and Muso who purchase product from Maruson and distributed to Australia is liable for all the damages and losses that has caused (ACL147). Spiral who is the importer owed a duty of care to Ms. Downie and the group members hold good to claims against Muso and Maruson ( Common Law, ACL S 138). The ignorance from the part has cause a great damages for the ultimate consumers.

ACL Part 5-4, Div 2 claims that the product should be fit the purpose and in particular acceptance to consumers which have been breached by the manufacturer. Part 3-5 perticularly says that it is the duty of the manufacturer – Maruson, Distributor – Muso and also the ultimate seller to retailer or consumers – Spiral to asses the safety of the standard of the product and to ensure no harm happens as a result of

Show More
Related
1356 Words | 6 Pages

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Ticketek Pty Ltd (2011) Nature of the Case and the central legal issue Australian Competition and consumer law (ACCC) held proceedings in 2011 against Ticketek Pty Ltd at the Federal Court for contravening with Section 46 of the Trade Practices Act now known as the Competition & Consumer Act (2010) at four instances. Tickettek was alleged for deterring or preventing Lasttix from engaging in competitive conduct in the ticketing related services market when they refused to apply discounted prices that were to be published by Lasttix (a rival ticketing company) & by doing so taking advantage of their substantial market power . The parties agreed to the pecuniary penalty issued by the federal court of $2.5 million on the 22nd December 2011 . Reasons for Choice & Importance of Case

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

MILLERSBURG — A Wooster man on Wednesday was given a chance to avoid prison when he was sentenced to complete a treatment program for admittedly being in possession of methamphetamine. Shaun Hall, 38, 540 High St., previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to aggravated possession of meth. In exchange for his guilty plea, a related charge of aggravated trafficking in meth was dismissed. Hall had faced up to a year in prison for the charge, and Judge Robert Rinfret imposed a term of 11 months, but immediately suspended the period of incarceration in favor of five years of community control, which includes the condition he complete a treatment program at the Stark Regional Community Corrections Center.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been essential accommodation on defendant. In this case the looking the material facts in the light most favorable to the Turner, it is difficult to conclude the material of the law, based on the evidence that Turners directly threaten to its employees or place an “Undue hardship” on Hershey. Therefore, the question whether Turners can perform the essential function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an open material fact for trial. Hershey will have a opportunities at trial to defeat Turners claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make vulnerable the health safety of its employees therefore an employer is not requires to accommodate an employee. Moreover, it would carry out an undue hardship that even with the accommodation.

Read More
1359 Words | 6 Pages

Licensed retailers fail to register all their complaints to Handy Andy because they had no idea what was going on. The problems in this case were revealed by a research conducted by a hired research which means without the research findings, none of the parties would have discovered the underlying

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Case Analysis: Trinity Western v. Law Society of Upper Canada In the following court case between Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, Judges MacPherson, Cronk, and Pardu JJ, at the Ontario Court of Appeal, determine whether to grant accreditation to a private Christian University, that wants to open its own law school. The three-judge panel analyzes the Law Society of Upper Canada’s (LSUC) decision to not accredit Trinity Western’s proposed law facility, which took place in April 2014. The judges consider the Charter rights at stake, as well as the LSUC’s mandate. The case of TWU v. LSUC will be thoroughly examined, with a specific focus on key concepts that influence law-making, such as social development and change,

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

The case was implied a Magistrate Judge, whose brief discoveries and recommendation completed up, and "the Pledge does not slight the Establishment Clause. " The District Court grasped that proposition and released the protestation on July 21, 2000. The Court of Appeals turned around and issued three separate choices talking about the benefits and Newdow 's standing. As it would see it, the offers court consistently held that Newdow has remaining as a watchman to challenge a practice that meddles with his qualification to facilitate the religious direction of his daughter. That holding managed Newdow 's remaining to challenge not only the game plan of the school locale, where his young lady still is enrolled, moreover the 1954 Act of

Read More
134 Words | 1 Pages

In 1913, E. Latham filed an petition against A. Stewart, a tax- collector of Fulton County to prevent him from collecting license taxes, however Georgia Supreme Court refused his petition to prevent the tax collector and deputy from collecting peddler’s tax claims due to GA. Civ. Cod der Ga. Civ. Code § 946.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

INTRODUCTION Defendant Ms. Kalani Herrera ("Ms. Herrera") respectfully request the court grants Ms. Herrera 's motion for summary judgment and dismiss the plaintiffs, Mr. And Mrs. Malone 's ("Malones") personal injury claim. The Malones have a brought a personal injury lawsuit against Ms. Herrera under the attractive nuisance doctrine on behalf of themselves and their daughter Maria Malone ("Maria"), a minor who was injured on an a peace of land art while trespassing on Ms. Herrera 's property. However, the plaintiffs have failed to establish elements that are pertinent to the claim. Landowners typically owe no duty to trespassers however, the doctrine of attractive nuisance is an exception to

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

The United States Supreme Court, the FDA requested that many similar cases such as this were prosecuted by the Department of Justice. The FDA allotted a number of reasons for further investigation into prosecutions including the reoccurrence of similar issues, life threating or injuries from violations and the knowledge of these violations by management. (park powerpoint). These prosecutions are a good foundation for investigation, but could go further as to limiting the number of occurrences allowed for each company with particular health issues, including bug infestations, temperature regulations and sanitation

Read More
1295 Words | 6 Pages

If the contract contained a provision prohibiting the sale of the company to competitors, Stangaid breached the contract by failing to uphold its contractual obligation to Drink-Co and violated the terms of the agreement when agreeing to the sale with Energy-cola. Conclusion: A valid contract existed between Stangaid and Drink-Co as there was an offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention exchanged. However, Drink-Co could have breached the contract when they labeled Augie-aid bottles with the Stangaid logo and ran ads stated that Augie-aid was now Stangaid. This action by Drink-Co could have confused customers and went outside the scope of the contract, violating the terms of the agreement.

Read More
105 Words | 1 Pages

In order to deal with the issue of medical negligence in the NHS, the Government had formed a funded pool of resources and capitals to accommodate the costs of claims whish are brought against the NHS. Later in 1995, the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) was set up to contest law suits on behalf of the Secretary of State. NHS Trust on the basis of assessments of their risk management procedures. The NHS Litigation Authority was created to deal with claims from patients who have been harmed while undergoing NHS treatment. It aims to pay justified claims promptly and fairly, and to defend unjustified claims

Read More
234 Words | 1 Pages

I do not believe there is a contract to convey real property between Wilbert Heikkila and David McLaughlin. McLaughlin agreed to buy three parcels of property for $145,000, $32,000 and $175,000. McLaughlin submitted his offer to Heikkila and earnest money checks. However after McLaughlin submitted the written offer to Heikkila, Heikkila changed the selling price of all three parcels, change the closing dates, and added a reservation.

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

As more fully set forth below, Dr. Croston is not qualified to render expert opinions on the subject of warnings as he has no experience in preparing warnings, cautions, or IFUs for medical devices. Dr. Croston is also not qualified to render expert opinions on the subject of whether the TX stapler had a manufacturing defect because

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

This gives us clearly advise that God wants us to do what is right and be honest. Yet, as previously stated, since it is a new company, it cannot predict liability with an individual sale, or reasonable accurate estimates because of no previous experiences. Thus, if the estimated warranty average of the other manufactures is around 4%, then it would pose an ethical dilemma if Craig and the company lowers it. A warranty is the guarantee that a manufacture of product will repair or replace the product for a certain period of time.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Australian Competition and Consumer act provides protection to most areas of the market that includes the relationship between such as seller and buyer. The main purpose of the act is to protect and provide the safest environment for Australian regarding the trade and competition. It broadly covers “Unfair market trading, Price Monitoring, Labelling, Product safety, Industry Codes” (ACCA).The well-known company Google got an assertion by the ACC states that some of the advertisements displayed by the Google conveyed misleading or misrepresentation and as a result, Google engaged in the conduct under the s52 of the trade practice act. Google said that these advertisements are not created by Google itself, they were made by the sponsor of Adwords

Read More

More about Australian Consumer Law Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document