Axis Countries After Ww2 Analysis

2223 Words9 Pages

Throughout history, people have helped each other to protect themselves from the evil that throughout the world. Like in World War II, countries banded together to rid the world in want they felt was wrong. The Axis countries banded together because they felt that the superpower countries were holding them down. On the other hand, the Allies countries band together because they seen the injustice that the Axis countries were inflicting on the world. Now there are always countries in any disagreement that remains neutral not seeing the benefits of supporting either side. Usually both sides try to influence these neutral parties to expand their ideology and grow in strength. After World War II, there has a huge ideology battle going on …show more content…

After the members successfully influenced the Burmese’s opinion on The Communist Party, the members faced one last challenge. The Russians sent, Vinich, their best man to Burma to squash this movement and regain the power they once had in the region. He was an “expert on Burma . . . a veteran of purges, conspiracies, plots, and counterplots” (p. 61). The Russians were going to try to control the Burmese using psychological effects. His plan would have succeeded if it were not for one of Finian’s members being able to spy and tape-recorded the conversation between Vinich and the local Communists. The Communist Farmer for three weeks advertised that on the radio there would be a special broadcast, which was the tape-recorded conversion. This tape showed the true intentions of the Russians and of The Communist Party. This broadcast destroyed any influence the Communist Party had over the local people. Father Finian and his eight members were able to influence the local people by using a psychological operation. Being able to influence people is always an underlining objective in our operations today. Our ability to accomplish our desired end state becomes virtually impossible without the support of the people. During OND, my detachment tried to analyze and utilize the psychological effects before, during, and after our …show more content…

The first SOF imperative that Homer Atkins used was ensuring long-term engagement. He showed this when he was developing the water pump system for the Sarkhanese people. Homer could have easily built a water pump with materials from all around the world, but he knew that the country population in Sarkhan would have not the economic and technological ability to maintain the water pump. He knew he must invent a water pump that would work only using materials that were acquirable in Sarkhan. Homer stated, “if the pump is going to work at all, it has to be their pump, not mine” (p. 216). What Homer meant by this was that the pump needed to be built with items that Sarkhanese people could manufacture with resources they could obtain, and not be dependent on an outside supplier to provide them the needed resources. Homer understood he must not begin a program that was beyond the Sarkhanese technological and economical capabilities. Homer’s ability to utilize this imperative to perfection led to the Sarkhanese people being able to manufacture their own pumps without any foreign suppliers. I wish we utilized this imperative in Iraq as well as Homer