The French Revolution occurred because of political, social, and economic inequalities within France. Unfair taxing in France contributed to starting the French Revolution because the third estate had to pay the most, despite the fact that they were the poorest class. The third estate had to give about 50% of their income to paying taxes, while the first and second estate had to pay less than 10% (Doc 2). This caused the third estate to start to go hungry, and lots of tension was building up.
In 1789 the French Revolution began. There were three estates. The political, social and economic conditions in France affected the third estate the most. King Louis xvi was an absolute ruler. He abused his powers.
Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède, or better known simply as Montesquieu, was born sixteen miles south of Bordeaux at Château de la Brède, France on January 18th, 1689. Charles’ family was very rich. His father, Jacques de Secondat, was a soldier with a long noble ancestry. His mother, Marie Françoise de Pesnel, brought the title of Baron La Brède to the Secondat family but died when Charles was seven years old. After his mother’s death, Secondat was sent to the Catholic College of Juilly, which was a renowned school for children of French nobility.
I honestly do admire the piece of artwork based on the quality of how it looks. For example, I like the attention to detail; the sword on the ground, the wound on the chest, and the facial expression all came together to make it a truly amazing composition. I agree with everything he has to say about it. For example, I can understand how he says the piece was made to commemorate Hellenistic wins from defeating the Gauls. I also like how he supported everything he talked about with some explanation.
Artistry can be either positive or negative depending on how it is used, and if it is justified. Bartolomé de Las Casas was a 16th century Spanish priest who wrote about the Spanish colonization of the West Indies. A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies is a letter written to the prince of Spain
In this poem, Baudelaire is having a conversation with his soul. He regards life as a hospital in which the patients long to change their beds. Baudelaire believes he’ll be happier elsewhere, and asks his soul “where?” He then suggests a variety of places that he knows his soul may take a liking to.
It was controversial because it sympathized with the evil and went against what the population considered to be
The piece was seen by the influential French critic Theophile Gautier. Gautier really thought his artwork was up to standard and thought it was a worthy piece of artwork. (Gerome
Manet debuted, arguably one of his most famous paintings, Olympia at the 1865 Paris Salon. Since its debut, Olympia has been the source of much debate and controversy. The public saw this piece as obscene—a flagrant disrespect to established moral traditions. However, current discussions focus less on the “lewd” nature of this painting and more on the theoretical perspectives explaining why the public viewed Olympia as scandalous. In “Manet’s Olympia: The Figuration of Scandal,” author Charles Bernheimer argues for a Freudian perspective in which sex is the most important factor influencing public opinion.
Art is like a language, ideas and thoughts that may not be able to be articulated any other way. The big debate is whether artist artwork is a waste of resources and time, or if it is good for the world with all the creativity and the beauty it has. Art is more than justifiable to enjoy it. The enjoyment of art gives modern
“Le Chat” by Charles Baudelaire is from the fascinating collection “Les Fleurs du Mal”, published in 1857. “Le Chat” is an erotic poem, which portrays the image of the cat in a complimentary manner. The cat is an ambivalent figure and is compared to a treasured woman. The poem contains two quatrains and two tercets but cannot be called a sonnet due to the alternation between decasyllable and octosyllable lines and not Alexandrian. Baudelaire does not adhere to the traditional rhyming scheme, which therefore makes it irregular.
But, taking into account all of Wilde’s arguments to defend the book, one must understand that this book isn’t looking to have a moral impact, but instead to free art from morality and social punishment, making society understand what aestheticism really is. Therefore, this book is neither moral nor
Kim grew up in a poor town without many jobs and had a boyfriend who was not a good partner to her. Kim, like so many others, ended up getting pregnant after having unprotected sex. With reluctance, she ended the pregnancy in an abortion. Then 4 months later, she found out that she was pregnant again. After becoming aware of the news, her boyfriend left her and she was alone, pregnant, and living in sub-poverty conditions.
Another thing that changed my mind was how willing some of these men were to sacrifice their lives for the artwork, like the disgraced British man sacrificing himself to try and save the Madonna. Afterward, Stokes is asked by President Truman if he thought the Madonna was worth his life, and he resolutely said that it was worth it, making a clear case for this line of reasoning. If one person is willing to risk their life for a piece of art, than obviously it is worth the value of their own life in that person’s eyes, like the First Lady saving original portraits of past Presidents from burning during the War of 1812. The examples listed paint a very clear picture that if a piece of artwork is worth risking a life over, than it can be worth a human
That is to say, not everyone can relate to a specific work of art on everything but there are always plenty more of them for they to appreciate and relate to themselves. Moreover, everything in this world is related to each other and art is one of them. Which proved the point that art is essential in building a successful country. The contributions of art are huge despite what people think of it.
