Today, if the courts take a different decision, the Appellant could use the social media to arrest her case. In the District of Columbia, the policy expressed. For example, in the case of Bean v. the United States, Bean Appellant violated § 22-3102, Bean was required to “prove that he did not enter a premises against the will of the lawful occupant of the individual lawfully in charge thereof”(Schwelb, 1998). The case is similar to Kelly v. the United States because they both violated the D.C. Code. § 22-3102, unlawful entry.