ipl-logo

Minarchy Advantages And Disadvantages

1401 Words6 Pages

The Benefits of a Minarchy A Minarchy is a libertarian form of government. A Minarchy is a limited government, that values the rights of the citizens. Libertarian governments are created to serve the people through individual freedoms. Compared to Authoritarian governments, Minarchies are more beneficial due to the individual freedom, trade , economics, and offers more benefits to the citizens, rather than the regime itself. Minarchial systems value free trade tremendously. A Minarchist believes in completely free trade, with no governmental influence. This is important because citizens can choose to buy or sell anything they please from anyone they want to do business with. A free market is created to allow competition in the market place. …show more content…

Citizens have the ability to voice their opinions and do as they please, even if it is against the government. Citizens have the power to make change in their government through activism, when they see necessary. In Authoritarian governments citizens are denied their freedoms and liberties. Freedom of speech, expression, and just about every form of freedom is limited or nonexistent in an Authoritarian government. In an Authoritarian government, when citizens speak against their government or leader, they often are jailed or even killed. According to Kathleen Touchstone (2010) “The rights of the individual must be protected and not infringed by the government” (p.18) As the United States has expanded to a bigger governmental power, the issue of “terrorism” grows each and every day. The reason on why terrorism exists and continues to grow and take place is another issue I won’t even address because I could talk about it all day. But, the United States government uses federal organizations such as the NSA, which violates our constitution, rights, and privacy. They have the ability to tap into any technological device, and they do so to in the name of “counter terrorism” to “protect

Show More
Related
456 Words | 2 Pages

“It was a pleasure to burn” (Bradbury 1). Fahrenheit 451 is about a firemen Guy Montag, who burns books, but starts questioning who books are being burned. Guy has a hard time getting the answers he wants, and he is soon to find out the world is not how he thought it was. Most people use technology today, just like the people in Ray Bradbury`s book Fahrenheit 451. In the book Fahrenheit 451 there are a lot of similarities in the book compared to today, such as technology, government overpower, and censorship.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

The moment that the Twin Towers fell in New York, America became destined for change. In the wake of these attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was quickly passed through congress, and signed by then-president, George W. Bush. The act itself gives the FBI and other government agencies the ability to do and use certain methods, many of which are already used by other law enforcement organizations, to help prevent future terrorist attacks. Since then, this piece of legislation has been the center of much debate and controversy. But, there is ample reason to believe that the Patriot Act is needed and effective.

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Many American citizens are willing to give up a certain degree of their rights, including their own privacy, to try and keep our country safe from terrorism. No matter the reason, however, it is never justifiable to interfere on our Constitutional rights. Former President Bush eavesdropping on innocent citizens, the USA PATRIOT Act, the Freedom Act, and Japanese internment camps are all primary examples of our constitutional rights as Americans being overlooked. “The United States trampling on the Constitutional rights of its citizens to protect the nation is never justifiable.” After the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1942, the United States were on their toes.

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

The Patriot Act violates this right in every way. This act allows the government to suspend property of a supposed terrorist without a notice or a warrant, whether the person is innocent or not. The Fifth

Read More
855 Words | 4 Pages

Not only does the act jeapordize these rights of citizens, but also fringes upon individual rights to privacy. At first, the government’s primary focus for the use of the act was only to protect the country from terrorists on American soil as well as future acts of terrorism that may ensue, but now, the government has used their unruly power to convict criminals who have virtually no relation to terrorism whatsoever which is clear example of governmental abuse of power. Another aspect of the Patriot Act which brings forth public fear is the fact that any individual can be kept an eye on and surveillanced. In order to obtain personal information of individuals, National Security Letters (NSL’s) are issued to federal agents without a judge’s approval. To make things worse, information acquired through NSL’s on completely innocent individuals can be kept and stored as opposed to being thrown out--a clear violation of right to privacy.

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

The USA PATRIOT (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001) was a necessary and effective piece of legislation that enhanced the security of the nation and will continue, in a modified form, to prevent future terrorist attacks although it was quite intrusive on American’s civil liberties. According to detailed study of the decade following 9/11, “If we just look at the decade between 2001 and 2011, we still see that the number of terrorist attacks has declined since Sept. 11.” So, in terms of achieving its goal, it has been successful. Signed into law by President George W. Bush in October of 2001 in the wake of the terrorist attacks on the United States during

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

The author of, You decide: Current Debates in Criminal Justice asks, “Is the Patriot Act a Necessary Protection Against Terrorism or a Threat to Our Civil Liberties?” (Waller) Proponents of the Patriot Act have claim that the law is a necessary protection against terrorism. In contrast, opponents of the Patriot Act claim that it is a violation of Americans’ civil liberties. Both sides of the argument have debated valid points for and against the Patriot Act. The, U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act is an acronym that stands for, Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

To be involved with the government, you would have to be associated with the party, or come from a family line of previous dictators. Some communist countries including North Korea, can control the economy and society of the land. That involves everything from imprisoning civilians, to stopping production of food and goods and more. The idea is that the government will provide citizens whatever they need to strive and further improve the government. This is different from democracy as the government does not have the power to overpower citizens and dictate the society as the many layers of government would prevent such power from being held.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

The government is justified in taking away Constitutional Rights during times of war because they need to keep us safe, so to be able to, the U.S. government needs to take away parts of our rights. The Patriot Act says, “The United States government did this in response to the need for increased security following terrorist attacks.” The purpose is to punish the terrorist acts in the United States and everywhere else, to increase

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

Personal Privacy There are many reasons why all counter-terrorism efforts potentially violate the 4th amendment. The government thinks that looking into other people’s privacy will be a better way to find their so called enemies but in doing so, that will also mean that they have to look into people’s information and some of those people may not have caused any crime of any sort. One targeting the wrong people for crimes they never committed, two searching a person without a valid warrant/reason, and invading in someone else's privacy without them knowing. It will be explained as to why it isn't right for the government to be spying on civilians as an excuse to save the country from potential enemies.

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

The far-reaching powers of the Patriot Act has substantially empowered our law enforcement agencies and allowed them to apprehend many offenders who otherwise would have gotten away with their crimes. Despite it being contradictious to the fourth amendment of the US constitution, it is not only helping prevent disastrous events in our nation but also equally instrumental in protecting American lives and defending civil liberties. After the endorsement of the Patriot Act, the tools and power it provided to our law enforcement agencies has enhanced our domestic security. This act tore down the legal and bureaucratic walls that would otherwise keep the law enforcement agencies from being able to share vital information freely about the terrorist’s

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

We, as Americans, along with the government, take away our personal freedoms. We, as America, push the limits of our freedom, which sometimes results in riots and death from attempting to prove a point. The government likes to call it terrorism because we do not agree to the terms of this free country. Even though it’s our god given right, the government has the right to take it away. What is this “it” our government restricts?

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

The ethical implication of gun control in United States today is a huge issue. Recently, the emergency rooms in hospitals are countless beset women and men wounded from gun shots. The gun phenomenon in United States is a real issue. There are many forms of gun control such as, gun education, and gun registration classes.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

In order to compare and contrast varying types of government within two or more countries, one must have a clear definition of Government and know the purposes it serves. Therefore, I did some research and I have established that Government is a group that exercises dominant power over a nation, state, society or other body of people. Governments are commonly responsible for constructing and implementing laws, handling money, and defending the general population from external threats, and may have other obligations or privileges. All over the world, there are many different types of government within countries. Each kind has its advantages as well as disadvantages regarding the general well-being of its peoples and economy.

Read More

More about Minarchy Advantages And Disadvantages

Related Topics

Open Document