Bernard Goldberg Bias Analysis

1741 Words7 Pages

As Bernard Goldberg presents the fact in his book Bias A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, castration can be talked as a joke on air, but cutting off breasts is not funny at all; female anchormen abuse the right of free speech to joke on men’s issue, but women’s issues always are serious topics, that can never be joked in the same way. Harry Smith, the former co-anchor of This Morning, in the interview, said “I’m under the assumption that most men are putzes.” But when he was asked what if to say women are puztes on air, he was laughing and answering “they would have tossed me out the freakin’ window.” (Goldberg, 132-3) Obviously, the mainstream media (msm) applies double standards on males and females. In the long human history, …show more content…

But, in North America, women are no longer dominated by men, and after decades’ efforts and struggle, in the cooperation with the feminists and the msm, it has already been in a post-feminist time. Stand for women, and speak as feminists have become the main rule that must be followed by the msm. In other words, people got “the license to overkill”. In fact, protecting women’s rights and realising the equality of men and women are necessary, but, in the meanwhile, men should not be ignored, or men’s rights should not be denied. I have watched one episode of What Would You Do, which was checking what people would do if there was a man abusing his wife/girlfriend, and if there was a woman abusing her husband/boyfriend. The result was people went to help the abused women immediately, but just passed by, ignored, or even laughed the abused men. When asked what were they thinking when they saw the man was abused by the women, most of them just assumed the men did something really bad, like cheating, and he deserved …show more content…

Christina Hoff Sommers appeals that being a normal boy is a serious liability in today’s classroom. In “The War on Boys”, Sommers says that the “war on women” time has already changed to “war on boys” time, and boys cannot be boys at school today in American, because schools have little patience for boys’ natural behaviours.She has pointed out four facts that generally exist in the elementary school today: first, some loved toys and games of boys has been removed or changed in school to build a risk-free schoolyard; second, recess time has been decreased, even eliminated in somewhere; third, boys are suffering the zero-tolerance policies at school; fourth, boys are forced to be reimagining in the society. It was shocked that “many games much loved by boys have vanished from school playground” (Sommers, 39), and “Tag could no longer be played…we ban superhero toys at school…rough play is too dangerous…playing house, going fishing, doctors, office work and grocery store keeps dramatic play positive” (Sommers, 42). For young boys, paly is one way of learning. These boys’ games can help boys learn teamwork and sense of justice, build their moral imagination, and improve their creativity and writing skills. There is no doubt that girls’ games are much less dangerous and more positive and calm, but it doesn’t mean girls’ games are better than boys, or these games could