Between Prophets Of Science And Frankenstein By Mary Shelley

660 Words3 Pages

David Brin once stated, “Change is the principal feature of our age and literature should explore how people deal with it. The best science fiction does that, head-on.” Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, portrayed science fiction in the best of ways by following the three characteristics needed in a science fiction: making it based on a plausible scientific principles and technology, making predictions about life in the future, and by commenting on important issues in society. However in some scenarios, her novel did not portray the characteristics of a science fiction, which could possibly strip the novel from its title as “the best example of Science Fiction.” Between Prophets of Science and Frankenstein, it was apparent that the novel held numerous great qualities, but did not carry the qualities wholeheartedly. …show more content…

This is displayed clearly because Shelley wrote this novel when there was technology in order to complete surgeries on human beings in the 1700’s. What this does for the novel is clearly gives off a believable source of how the monster came to life through technological advances. “Although I possessed the capacity of bestowing animation, yet to prepare a frame for the reception of it, with all its intricacies of fibres, muscles, and veins…” (Shelley, 53) However, Shelley does not show plausible scientific principles and technology through this story due to the fact that back then (and even now) one cannot bring something back to life, making it