ipl-logo

Bigamy Section 57

997 Words4 Pages

In this essay it will first define what Bigamy is, which will ultimately help shape the understanding of the offence. This essay will then begin to focus on explaining the components of the offence. In order to address this, it will look in detail on a variety of cases about the lacking nature of Section 57. Subsequently, this essay will cover critically on the section 57 of the offences Against the Person Act 1861, clearly arguing on the obscure wording of the statue and how the judges can use a range of rules to apply to help make sense of legislation. Firstly, bigamy ‘is the crime of knowingly marrying a person when already married to another. It is punishable by up to 7 years imprisonment’ (McFarquhar, 2011, p.20). It is not a worldwide …show more content…

However he argued that his wife refused to sign the divorce papers. Nevertheless, he could have been entitled to a statement based on irretrievable breakdown. In contrast R v Tolson (1889) is more complex in trying to find a straight forward understanding. To summarize she believed her husband has been dead for seven years. She married again prior to the fact she is already married and during this time, her husband turns up. As Kenny (2015, p.16) puts it “a crime is not committed if the mind of the person doing the act in question be innocent’. Since she did not have the intention to do something wrong the court gave her the defense of mistake. To expand, for a criminal offence mental elements are required however, how can they be applied to bigamy? Well According to Fraser (1976, cited in Ormenerod 2012) he is trying to get across that there is no mental element in the case R v Tolson other than the intention to go through a marriage …show more content…

This is especially presented in bigamy section 57. However, the meaning can become clear despite the piece of legislation not being renewed. As Twining and Miers (2010:342) states ‘shall marry is ambiguous…the interpretation is a possible one’. This means the judges will be left to interpret the stature related to the case in order to provide a normal reasonable outcome which can be achieved, but only with great care. According to Ormerod (2012: 274) he highlights there are a very small number of court of appeals that make decisions on the correct approach for sentencing bigamy. Despite this being said, the courts are able to refer to Parliamentary debates recorded in Hansard when they feel the act is open to more than one

Show More
Related
423 Words | 2 Pages

What rule of law emerged from your reading of this case regarding the existence of a common law marriage? A common-Law marriage valid in the state where it was entered into, is to be regarded as valid in another state that as long as the legal requirements of those states have been met . If the common law marriage of Hargrave and Duval had been valid, would the marriage have been deemed valid in Massachusetts?

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

Keeping the facts of the case in mind the accused was aware of her husband’s tendencies towards acting angrily and impulsively, Creakle’s rage at Esther’s departure was further fueled by their prior argument. After she told him to “go away” the reasonable person would believe that if she could no longer see him he had taken heed to her advice. Knowing the nature of her husband Esther was cautious and double checked to confirm he had left, due to her restricted visibility she was unable to see him. In this situation, her actions did not fall below the expected standard of care as she was cautious towards the outcome and took steps to ensure Creakle’s safety. As was ruled in Beatty (2008) if a reasonable person holding the knowledge of the accused, could not have foreseen the consequences of their actions they are not morally blameworthy, and therefore lack the mens rea necessary for the criminal offence (Verdun-Jones, 2015, p.120)

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

He first explained how marriagewas forced upon the Christian community. He then gave the consequencesof gay marriage and how it can affect society. He also gave evidence from experiences to statistics to crack up his point. He then relayedback to what he believed as a Christian which was a married mother and father nurturing children in a stable home. He then ended his essay under hasty generalisation.

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

Although there was limited concrete evidence to convict her guilty beyond reasonable doubt, it is safe to assume she committed the murder. Margaret Hossack should be convicted guilty of the murder of her husband, due to the holes in her defense case, the history of the couple’s unsteady relationship, and a financial induced motive (Bovsun). The defense by Mrs. Hossack was questioned repeatedly by the prosecutors, and rightfully so. There were too many holes in her defense claim and story.

Read More
1960 Words | 8 Pages

Justice Tindall, whom was present at the M’Naughten trial when the insanity plea became a legal defense, breaks these rules into 3 statements. “Every person is presumed sane unless the contrary can be proven otherwise” (Allnut, et al. 293), which in this case it cannot. “A person suffering a ‘partial delusion’ should be dealt with as if the circumstances of the delusion was real” (Allnut, et al. 293). If Minnie was suffering from some sort of delusions, she would have used that as an excuse once Mr. Hale found her or would’ve had some crazy story on what happened. She got straight to the point.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

The issue is determining whether an individual truly meets the legal definition of insanity. The concept of insanity is constantly changing, which makes it difficult to truly find an individual to be legally insane. In 1843, Daniel M’Naghten, a Scottish wood turner, attempted to assassinate the prime minister of England (Koocher & Keith-Spiegel, 2008). He suffered from paranoid delusions and killed another man instead. He was found not guilty, because he was unable to realize the wrongfulness of the act.

Read More
1445 Words | 6 Pages

The court dismisses the plea quickly because “the justice system ignores psychosocial complexities and histories in favor of black and white definitions of right and wrong” (Myers). The justice system in this time very rarely accepted pleas of insanity or mental illness. Capote wrote that “after an hour’s conversation with the defendants, the doctor rule[d] out that neither man

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

Sleazy Lawyer Essay James Goode R.A.F.T Exercise Is it not clear your honour, that this loving wife was experiencing a brief moment of crippling insanity that caused her lash out against her husband? I am certain that she is a caring wife who sees him as a flower would see the sun, this love for him was indeed taken and shattered as she was told of their imminent divorce while she was already stressed for she was expecting child. Do you not believe that a woman with child, experiencing such crippling emotions might indeed lead her to have a moment of insanity? As you can see before you stands my client and it is quite obvious she is expecting a child very soon.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

Monogamy was insisted upon, divorce and re-marriage became more difficult. Concubinage, though it could not be abolished, ceased to be lawful. A general rule is that respect for women is only found in a society in which monogamy is the rule. We must distinguish between the affected idolatry which was enjoyed by the customs of chivalry and the equality which was upheld by the Church.

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

If arrangements are made and both families approve, the two can have some influence with regard to the date of marriage and can have a period of supervised courtship. This is in sharp contrast to the American society were the man and the women do not need to not need to gain family approval and can live together for an indefinite period of time before they decide to get married (Little and price,

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Although Jane Austen’s novel, “Mansfield Park” reflects capitalist, patriarchal family and social structures of the Elizabethan Era in which she wrote, with the father as the authority of the home and women with no right to possession of property, Austen has through the use of this novel, posed a challenge to these common practices. The domination of women was already ingrain in a world that was male conquered, ever since the beginning of time, even before capitalism, which features class division among its people. In a patriarchal society men are seen as the dominant fixture over women in all aspects of social life. Jane Austen “Mansfield Park” was written in a period historians term as “Regency England” (1811-20). The family and social structure during this period was highly patriarchal.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

Even though irretrievable breakdown of marriage has not been stated under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as a ground for divorce, there have been many judgments which gave decisions based on the principle. In Ajay Sayajirao v. Rajashree Ajay Desai , the court docket had held that when there is no alleged fault floor proved, comfort cannot be granted on floor of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. However, a differing stance was taken in the case of in Dinesh Kumar Mandal v. Mina Devi , it was held that a couple dwelling one after the other for decades justify the reality that the wedding is broken past restore and even though the alleged floor of adultery changed into not demonstrated here, divorce was granted.

Read More
1728 Words | 7 Pages

Adultery is when one person has sexual relations or intimacy with persons other than their spouse or current partner, also known as cheating. In this paper, I argue that adultery is morally impermissible in any circumstance. The film The Other Women accurately depicts adultery as a morally impermissible option. Adultery is an ethical issue that some may seem as permissible under certain circumstances, such as one’s spouse not being around or not being satisfied in the current relationship. However, adultery is morally impermissible because it violates the trust between the two in the committed relationship, it causes emotional and may cause physical harm, and it can impact the life of the family and other relationships involved.

Read More

More about Bigamy Section 57

Related Topics

Open Document