Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

The attack on December 7th 1941 on American soil was a factor for nuclear events to arise between the United States and Japan. The bombing of Pearl Harbor caused the United States to enter World War II taking the side of the allies, yet once the war ended in Europe the fight between the United States and Japan was alive on the Pacific. The United States dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6th 1945 and three days later on Nagasaki to end the conflict between the countries. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified politically in order to end the brutal war both countries were faced with save many American lives while benefiting the nation economically by sustaining supplies. The atomic bomb was a form of revenge against

Politicians argue that a simple threat towards the Japanese regarding the weapon the United States was creating would be enough to get the Japanese to surrender. However, the United States warned the nation before hand of the bomb threat as it was incoming, yet the Japans government refused to surrender. As well the Japanese have a prominent ideology to never surrendering. Also, many historians argue that The United States could have out waited for the Japanese to loose military supplies, food and economic prosperity, however the United States as well faced economic issues of having the funds to fight such a long war overseas. Many argue that the target of the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not morally justified because they were civilian locations, yet historical sources outline the military production within the area that would reduce the economic wealth within Japan. The only alternative from the United States dropping the atomic bomb was to invade Japan on foot, which would cost resources, lives and time. The United States has a significant opportunity to drop the atomic bomb that could be justified economically and politically as a necessary evil to end the war in the Pacific