ipl-logo

Brutus Vs Caesar

976 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of mark antony's speech

Will of Man: To Bend or To Break
Shakespeare's classical Julius Caesar centers around two key themes that fuel the story, the characters, and their actions: betrayal and manipulation. The two occur several times throughout the play as a result of the main character's ability to wheedle the common people and other government members into their own plans. One such example of powerful persuasion lies in the way the funeral speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony drive the Plebeians to their own motives. While their speeches reflect one another, one comes out victorious over the other. Mark Antony's manipulative style of public speaking ultimately overpowers Brutus' call to reason and honor.
Constantly portrayed as a noble and loyal man, Brutus pleads with the …show more content…

But why does Mark Antony's prove more successful? The two speeches are similar in their play on emotions and feeling to draw in the Plebeians. Both even start with the same call to the people as "Romans, countrymen, and lovers!". Moreso than a political, official-sounding opening, the way they each open their statements is meant to embrace the people and to make them feel as though the speaker has a genuine affection for them. Additionally, both have resources and information at their disposal to back up their views. Supporting their ideas with facts provides a strong backbone for which the speakers both build around. However, while Brutus uses theoretical possibilities of what may have happened, Mark Antony is able to provide concrete evidence. The will of Caesar may have given him the necessary edge he needed to win over the general population of Rome and seize the power that later brings about the downfall of several majors characters. While the viewpoints of both of the funeral orators bear similar structure, one triumphs over the other due to it's ability to defend itself better than the

Show More
Related
553 Words | 3 Pages

When Mark Antony sees Caesar dead he plans to rebel against Brutus and cause a riot. He goes up to the people of Rome and proves to them that Caesar had no intention of turning his back on them. Mark Antony uses pathos, logos and ethos to convince the people of Rome that Caesar did not deserve to be killed. Mark Antony uses pathos effectively in his speech to persuade the people of Rome to rebel against Brutus. Antony’s speech was meant to give strong emotion towards the audience

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus uses the appeals of Ethos, Pathos, Logos to manipulate the thoughts and feelings of the plebeians to join Brutus’

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, a man named Marcus Julius Brutus makes controversial decisions that both angers and swoons the nation of Rome. The people who are angered see Brutus as selfish, unnecessary, and overall dishonorable. Although Brutus seem disgraceful to some, his honorable characteristics is shown when he cares for his friends, is selfless around others, and acts morally responsible when under pressure Brutus decides to join a conspiracy to kill his best friend in order to get honor. When I first realized this, it seemed like the most dishonorable thing to do.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

At the funeral, both of Caesar’s friends, Brutus and Antony, made a speech. In Brutus’s speech he was very concise and was saying that he did it all for Rome. Brutus used logos and ethos in his speech. To fortify his speech, he used logos which is logic and reason. In his speech, he says listen to my reasons and he goes onto his reasons that Caesar would have become ambitious and enslaved them all.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

One example of why Brutus is not a villain is because he shows compassion towards others. This is portrayed when he spares Mark Antony after Caesar’s death even though the other conspirators wanted him to be killed right along side of Caesar. Another time Brutus showed compassion was when he aloud Mark Antony to speak at Caesar’s

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar by Shakespeare explores many modern day themes to tell the tragedy of Brutus, Cassius, and Caesar. The most present of these themes is described as manipulation, and this is present in the time of the Roman Empire, as well as in a high schoolers’ everyday life. Throughout the play, there are many instances where manipulation is used by one character onto another, but this theme is most evident during the funeral speeches after Caesar's death. Brutus spoke first, as this was one of the terms in allowing Marc Antony to speak as well. During his speech, we find that Brutus wants to convince the audience that there was a real reason for Caesar's death.

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

Marcus Brutus vs. Julius Caesar "When beggars die there are no comets seen; The heavens themselves blaze forth the death of princes." (II.ii.31-32) In William Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar,” Caesar is betrayed by his best friends. Although Caesar is killed, Brutus is also greatly affected. The best title for this play would be “The Tragedy of Marcus Brutus.”

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony uses rhetorical appeals and techniques in his speech to turn the people of Rome against those conspiring against Caesar. As a result, the people see Antony as a persuasive and strong leader of Rome. Antony opens his speech at Caesar’s funeral by using ethos to present himself as a credible source and a friend of Caesar. Antony states his purpose in the beginning of his speech by starting with “I come to bury

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

Do you like to try to persuade people to do things? Brutus and Mark Anthony persuade the people of rome to do two very different things after Caesar dies. Brutus tries to get the people the accept the death while Antony tries to convince the people to go after the conspirators. Brutus’ speech was a really good piece of argument he used a lot of pathos to really get the crowd going after he used some ethos to understand why they should believe him.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, Marc Antony appears to be a strong advocate for Julius Caesar’s triumphs and increasing power. However, like Caesar, Antony is extremely manipulative and powerful. After Caesar’s death, Antony manipulated the conspirators into believing he was on their side before requesting to speak at Caesar’s funeral. While Brutus and the conspirators remained fooled by Antony’s innocence, Antony took the initiative to inform the Roman citizens of the conspirator’s horrendous actions towards their beloved leader, Julius Caesar. Caesar’s funeral was a time of reflection for the citizens of Rome, as Marc Antony caused them to question their allegiance to Brutus.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

They both presented their points and tried to convince the split crowd on their view points. They also both used different rhetorical devices and figurative languages to persuade. Mark Anthony also had the dramatic reveal of Caesar's bloody body which was a very persuasive and shocking

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

However, by stopping Brutus’s plan to end tyranny, he became a tyrant himself in the future, once again defeating Brutus at the end of the play. The success of Antony in this one speech had a drastic effect on the outcome of the play. Upon the conclusion of the two speeches, the winner was decided quite easily by the crowd, demonstrating the power of rhetoric. Having the full support of his audience, Antony easily triumphed over his foes and became one of the leaders of Rome, which had not been his intention in the beginning either. At the end of the play, Mark Antony, as foreshadowed, triumphs over Brutus and the other conspirators, and becomes a tyrant of

Read More

More about Brutus Vs Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document