Brutus and Antony both spoke to the Plebeians at Caesar’s funeral with the intent to persuade the crowd to be in favor of themselves. Since Brutus utilized Ethos and Logos to explain his actions and nothing more, his speech was logical. Correspondingly, he had spoken with the hope that the situation would resolve with the Plebeian’s understanding and his entry into Kingman ship. Meanwhile, Antony made use of Pathos with Logos. Therefore, Antony’s monologue was based emotionally.
By comparing the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, in the speeches made by Brutus and Antony, it becomes clear that Antony is more persuasive. Even though the speech made by Brutus had some moments where it was superior overall it wasn’t as persuasive and Antony’s. Antony’s speech successfully convinces the crowd through the three elements being examined. Ethos is credibility for the speaker, by having ethos it becomes easier for the speaker to convince the crowd of something.
In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus uses ethos, logos, pathos, and rhetorical devices to convince the Romans that the execution of Caesar was necessary for the greater good of Caesar himself and the people. When explaining why it was vital for Caesar to be killed, Brutus explains it wasn't that he “loved Caesar less,” rather that he “loved Rome more” (3.2.21-22). By using parallel structure, Brutus makes it appear that he evaluated the two ideas equally in order for the Romans to see that his love for Rome triumphed over his friendship to one person. By saying that he doesn't hate Caesar, Brutus communicates that he was once friends with Caesar, which can be an example of ethos because it gives him credibility that he was even
Brutus used ethos ineffectively in his funeral speech to establish his credibility amongst the Plebeians and demonstrate that he had the right to speak. He and the other conspirators had just murdered Caesar, so they had to come out to justify their actions. Brutus came out to speak to the Plebeians, and he used ethos to make himself reliable and worthy of speaking to his audience. Brutus said, “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe”(III.ii.15-17). “Mine honor” referred to the fact that Brutus was a well-regarded and honorable Senator, and also a descendent of people who paved the way for the republic.
In the tragedy, Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, two men, Brutus and Antony, use many different techniques to manipulate the minds of the people. Some of these techniques included in their speeches are ethos, logos, and pathos. Both of them appeal to these three rhetorical strategies in their language, but indeed want exceedingly different outcomes. To start off, Brutus applies ethos, the appeal to knowledge, to his speech when he says, “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe” (III,ii.
First, Brutus uses ethos to justify that his “love to Caesar was no less than his” (III.ii.19). This manipulates the Plebeians into believing he and Caesar have a strong relationship. It also brings the Plebeians compassion and lets them know there is love between them even in his death. Pathos is also used by Brutus to honour Caesar through “tears for his love, joy for his fortune, honour for/ his valour, and death for his ambition.” (III.ii,27-28).
Now the difference between the use of rhetorical questions in these speeches is that Antony's was used effectively, he worded it in such a way that stirred feelings as well as made them think. Brutus, on the other hand, only appealed to logic and talking to the citizens in such a way that almost offended them. Brutus says “Who is here so Vile that will not love his country?”. This is a rhetorical question that is weak because it is offending people in a way of making them feel bad if they don't love Rome with a burning passion. This isn't effective because the only thing this could do is make the romans feel as if they are being attacked.
He gives his crowd the option to leave if they thought what he was going to say was nonsense. Ethos is an appeal to ethics, and it is a means of convincing someone to stay and listen or of anything, but in Brutus's
But Antony uses rhetorical questions, logical, and ethical appeals to give a better speech to the people of Rome than Brutus does. Firstly, Antony uses rhetorical questions designed to highlight Caesar's virtues and portray him as a hero. This allows the people of Rome to feel empathy towards Caesar and
Ethos, Pathos, and logos are the rhetorical triangle of a speaker's ability to appeal to their audience. Both men used the credibility of their names, logic, and showed emotion during their speeches to the citizens of Rome. The one fatal flaw that makes their speech so different is their use of actions to the audience. Brutus’ speech is not just about Caesar, it is also his way of convincing the crowd that his murder was not out of malice or blood lust. His starting words weren't about Caesar, they were about how the crowd should judge his actions fairly based on how they knew
At the funeral, both of Caesar’s friends, Brutus and Antony, made a speech. In Brutus’s speech he was very concise and was saying that he did it all for Rome. Brutus used logos and ethos in his speech. To fortify his speech, he used logos which is logic and reason. In his speech, he says listen to my reasons and he goes onto his reasons that Caesar would have become ambitious and enslaved them all.
In Brutus’s speech he used ethos and logos to try and control the people of Rome. He was stoic and blinded of what Antony was capable of. He wanted to change their minds about the conspiracy and the murder of Caesar. Brutus says “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men” (III, i, 23-24).
Antony used pathos when he stated sarcastically mentioning how honorable Brutus was. Sarcastically and using examples to show that he truly is not, the crowd started to catch on and figure it out. Antony used logos by providing logical arguments to prove why Brutus’ statement that Caesar was ambitious is wrong. Antony also used Ethos when he speaks to the Romans. There were many differences in Antony and Brutus’ speech as well, including the ways they used strategies: pathos, logos and ethos.
This is ethos in the way it gives him credibility as a friend, suggesting that he would truly know Caesar. But, it is also pathos because it makes the crowd sorrowful for him because someone that is close to him has been killed. The use of ethos, logos and pathos made Marc Antony’s argument and speech far superior to Brutus’s. Another reason that makes Marc Antony’s argument more valuable is
Brutus 's speech: Brutus speaks to the people of rome why he killed caesar so they will not turn on him. He talked about how he didnt kill him because he didn 't love him but because it was for the better of rome. He also tells the people of rome that letting caesar become king would mean the government type would change and all the wars and hard work his family had put into the government would go away. He also states, for the welfare of rome that he would die for rome if rome demands his death Rhetorical devices: Brutus used questions, logos, parallelism, and pathos to stir the people of rhome. Question-
