ipl-logo

Business Rights Act Of 1964 Essay

691 Words3 Pages

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a very monumental moment in U.S. history. The act outlawed any discrimination based on color, age, race, religion, or sex. The main objective of this act was to give freedoms to those of minority groups, specifically the African Americans. The act instructed desegregation meaning that business and schools could not reject individuals just because of their demographics. However, not everyone was eager for, or willing for, these changes. Southern states were very resistant to these changes and argued that their constitutional rights were being violated by forcing businesses to desegregate. The overall argument is that the businesses’ constitutional rights are being violated because the government is telling …show more content…

The biggest argument that businesses exclaimed was as stated in Dave Davies’ article, “How American Corporations Had A ‘Hidden’ Civil Rights Movement”, “You tell many, many cases of corporations going before the courts and saying, if we were a person, we would have this right – the right to sue here, the right to freedom of speech, you know, the right to the exemption from unreasonable searches and seizures” (Davies, 2018). Their overall belief was that the federal government could not tell them who to serve or allow in their businesses and schools. Business owners argued that the government’s actions were in violation of the 14th Amendment, Section 1 of the Constitution which states, “no state shall make or enforce any law which abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive and person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” (U.S. Constitution, 1787). Where this statement holds some truth, it has since been established that the Constitution was ultimately written for the individual rather than the businesses. Therefore, businesses were overridden and required to not discriminate against anyone based on their …show more content…

Many southern businesses and individuals were against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. They were resistant and argued that it was their constitutional right to decide if they wanted to desegregate. In this situation, the federal government’s ability to override the states was essential. This idea is like that of the Federalist No. 51 in the sense of check and balances. The Federalist No. 51 talks about checks and balances within the government, ensuring that there is a separation of powers (Madison, 1788). In the case of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a checks and balance system overrode the idea that businesses could not segregate based on demographics and supported the favor of the people. Many businesses were still resistant to the idea of desegregating but were not able to deny service. Another way in which African Americans were protected were through the overall idea of Federalist No. 10. Federalist No. 10’s overall idea is to guarantee that one specific group of people with the same opinion cannot override the minority (Madison, 1787). The southern states could not cast their opinion and override the decisions of the government, therefore protecting the African

Show More
Related
1024 Words | 5 Pages

“The lack of… nationality, I believe, is one of the great evils of the times…” Senator John Sherman stated on February 10, 1863. The United States had been split into sections from the beginning, and it created a lack of unity and togetherness. In Document A, the reader can acquire from the reading that South Carolina (and later many other states) seceded from the Union because of states’ rights. Document A states that an amendment (specifically the

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

The Civil Rights act Of 1964 is an act that prohibited discrimination in public places.on july 2, 1964 johnson gave a speech about race and sex. The laws and people were still separate but equal. So that meant that blacks and whites were still separated but have the same rights.

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

In the text, it says “first, that the African slave trade. should for at least twenty years be. a national interest under the American flag, and protected by the national arm;” That text is trying to say that the other states had to sort of agree to this because of the southern states being stubborn. They would have been forced into a stand still and the Constitution would have taken years to write if the different states argued back and forth because of their different beliefs. All of the things that were mentioned in the news article benefited the southern states the

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Prior to The Civil War, African Americans did not have any rights what so ever but after the war, they gained “citizenship, the right to vote, and other rights”(146). The Separate but Equal doctrine was found unconstitutional during the Civil Rights Act of 1960. This idea of society violates the 14th amendment because the 14th amendment was set in place for equal protection. Many of the key provisions that the government made during the Civil Rights Movement of 1964 helped all of the minorities become equal. The provisions included forbidding the discrimination in the workplace public domains, and gave the government authorization to investigate and bring lawsuits to schools that did not desegregate, The Civil Rights that the Americans are blessed to have are protected by the court system being that everyone has the right to a due process.

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

Still, the tightly packed theory of the Constitution gave the South a well-developed political philosophy to which it would turn when sectional conflicts became more intense. Calhoun was in denial that the nullification was a step forward to disunion. To make certain for the safety of a large, diverse nation was for each state to be convinced that on the national actions would never abuse its rights or vital interests. As stated from Calhoun’s theory of the “concurrent majority,” slaveholders, that was also included in each major interest, should have a veto over all measures that affected

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

“It does not matter if these people are different genders, races or have different religious beliefs. As long as they are citizens, they have equal rights.(What are Civil Rights)” This quote shows where people would like to be somewhere in the near future. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 were several events that lead to the end of segregation of African Americans. The Civil Rights Acts were acts to show people that it doesn’t matter your skin color, or ethnicity, but that everyone should welcome each other as equals.

Read More
1918 Words | 8 Pages

As a result of the Brown vs. Board of Education decision, The United States legislators wrote the Southern Manifesto in 1956. They believed that the final result of Brown v. Board of Education, which stated that separate school facilities for black and white children were fundamentally unequal, was an abuse of the judicial power. The Southern Manifesto called for the exhaust of all the lawful things they can do in order to stop all the confusion that would come from school desegregation. The Manifesto also stated that the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution should limit the power of the Supreme Court when it comes to these types of issues. 2.

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

The ruling thus lent high judicial support to racial and ethnic discrimination and led to wider spread of the segregation between Whites and Blacks in the Southern United States. The great oppressive consequence from this was discrimination against African American minority from the socio-political opportunity to share the same facilities with the mainstream Whites, which in most of the cases the separate facilities for African Americans were inferior to those for Whites in actuality. The doctrine of “separate but equal” hence encourages two-tiered pluralism in U.S. as it privileged the non-Hispanic Whites over other racial and ethnic minority

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will focus on the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I will provide the history, the important people involved in the establishment of the Civil Rights Act, the events that led to the act, and the reactions from the people, mostly Southerners, after the act was established. In the year of 1963, Blacks were experiencing high racial injustice and widespread violence was inflicted upon them. The outcry of the harsh treatments inflicted upon them caused Kennedy to propose the Civil Rights Act.

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was an act that denied people the permission to commit hate crimes and discriminate against people of different color, race, religion, and gender. Although the Civil Rights act of 1964 had many titles, its main goal was to end the discrimination.

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

They also decided that Alabama’s regulation on foreign businesses, used to properly regulate commerce, had discouraged participation in constitutional rights. The state was wrong for upholding its statue against the NAACP in such a way. The actions performed by the state government may seem to have no involvement with personal rights, but the act of specifically challenging a company for their belief was unconstitutional and violated rights assured under the First and Fourteenth

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Introduction The 14th Amendment promised “equal protection of law,” and it formed the basis for enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. All the Americans during 1960s expected their presidents and the courts to fulfill the 14th amendment through creation of the much anticipated act. The provisions of the constitution on equal protection failed to protect discrimination based on gender, ethnicity and race (Brown, 2014). Civil rights Act of 1964 was passed a public law 88-352 on 2nd July the same year. It spelled out provisions for protection from firing, promotion and even hiring on the basis of race or sex.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is hailed by many as one of the most important legislations in the American history. The act was passed into law 52 years ago under a lot of pressure and resistance from white senators and African American activists. The act, which was largely known as the “Bill of the century” was aimed at bringing equality for blacks and whites and end racial prejudice. The act was targeted to revolutionize America where blacks and whites would eat together in the same hotels and enjoy similar rights in public places without any discrimination.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

The Southern Manifesto, is a document written in the year of 1956, February-March, in the United States. Its purpose being to object racial integration of public places. The Declaration of Constitutional Principles encouraged states to resist performing the mandates that were reached in the Brown v. board of education decision regarding the racial integration of public schools. This document represents significant historical events to this time, changing the way the system worked, and changing public schooling forever. Congress stated that it would reverse the decision because the courts rulling was contrary to the US Constitution.

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

This Act President John F. Kennedy started, but was never finished by him due to his assassination. Lyndon Baines Johnson finished it. The Civil Rights Act stopped discrimination of your race or gender in workplaces. This act also stopped segregation in schools and public places.

Read More

More about Business Rights Act Of 1964 Essay

Related Topics

Open Document