Graff describes his childhood experiences with his own hidden intellectualism. At the end, Graff notes that students need help figuring out their intellectualism, and educators can help by showing students how
He goes on to explain how street smarts and academic smarts need to go hand to hand and work much
Graff explains how kids with street smarts aren’t interested in traditional education and consequently don’t do well in subjects of school studies. In his essay Graff states, “I was your typical teenage anti-intellectual-or so I believed for a long time. I have recently come to think, however, that my preference for sports over schoolwork was not anti-intellectualism so much as intellectualism by other means.” (Graff 245) Graff thinks the education system is not benefiting from students’ street smart because students cannot use the cleverness they have for what interest them and apply it into their school work. I agree that by using what a student already knows will not only help benefit their learning experience, but it will also keep the
For word smart Simon always engaged in conversation, and he read the bible, and used references from the bible many times in the movie. For example while talking with the Reveron he brings up references from the bible to support his argument. Simon also showed people smart. Using the example from before, Simon knew how to help the little boy and get him to stop crying and become more confident. And last, Simon is also self smart, because he is self motivated.
“Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff, argues that being street smart can bring more intellectualism to a person then being book smart can, and how schools and communities contribute to them.
Everyone dreams of being the perfect student by being extremely smart, and having the ability of wanting to complete assignments, read some interesting books, and studying to pass every test. In the “Scholarship Boy” this boy illustrates that being too book smart can affect one’s personal life. Rodriguez describes himself as a good student, but a troubled son.
He could try every year to get in to college and get his accreditation that he needs to publish his ideas and findings. It is not a question of how smart he is. It is a question of how much he wants to be successful and how much he wants to follow his
In Gerald Graff 's essay “Hidden Intellectualism” starts of by talking about the stereotype of being so called “street smart” and and being “book smart” and how in school when you see someone who is street smart but doesn’t do go in school get a bad wrap. People look at them as a waste because they can’t apply there intelligences that they have and use it towards school, so people view them as not the right kind of smart because they are not a A student in school. Graff then goes on to say that maybe it is not the students that are the problem with how they do in school but maybe it is the school that have missed or overlooked the intellectual potential that kids with street smarts have. Graff also says that we only view the educated minds through schooling as the right way and schools and colleges look at kids who do not like school and don’t do well as anti-intellectual people.
But not a lot become an inspiration and go beyond to prove those people wrong. " The Joy of Reading and Writing: Superman and Me" by Sherman Alexie, he proved to people that he wasn't one of the Indian children who was expected to be dumb. "I refused to fail. I was smart.
They’re not taken seriously or listened to because they’re not academically educated. Street smarts is overlooked by teachers and undervalued by parents. Graff’s argument is that these street-smart kids are just as valuable as those who are academically gifted because within the “street-smarts” can be found “book-smarts”. There are different types of intelligence but they are not unequal in importance. I strongly agree with Graffs argument since I can relate on a personal level.
He showed the same amount of intelligence that was required of supervisors in the painting line. Readers are led to assume that the job a person works does not measure how smart they are. In today’s society, many people can not afford an education after high school but that does not mean that they are not as intelligent as a doctor or lawyer if they could afford the schooling. Not everyone has the funds to acquire degrees and titles and some just do not have the desire to continue their education. While many believe that a higher education is a worthwhile pursuit, it is also not the best route for many people.
published from 1985-1995. From the perspective of literary and cultural studies, it is a valuable postmodern text in terms of both its form and content. It pokes fun at the postmodern condition and the seemingly high-brow nonsensical expression (or babble) associated with it. It is itself presented as postmodern nonsense/babble or pomobabble (a portmanteau word) with its roots in American suburbia and the value –systems associated with the ‘Land of Stars and Stripes’. This paper addresses the depiction of Calvin (and his alter-ego Hobbes) as the child who exhibits all the characteristics of the modern ‘angry young man’.
Although he was more than proficient in subjects most were struggling in, he was still
Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes, two titans of the Enlightenment, work within similar intellectual frameworks in their seminal writings. Hobbes, in Leviathan, postulates a “state of nature” before society developed, using it as a tool to analyze the emergence of governing institutions. Rousseau borrows this conceit in Discourse on Inequality, tracing the development of man from a primitive state to modern society. Hobbes contends that man is equal in conflict during the state of nature and then remains equal under government due to the ruler’s monopoly on authority. Rousseau, meanwhile, believes that man is equal in harmony in the state of nature and then unequal in developed society.
Hobbesian Theory in Lord of the Flies The question of whether man is inherently good or evil has been debated amongst religions, philosophers, and many great thinkers since the beginning of man itself. On one hand, there are those who believe we as humans are naturally moral beings, and it is society that makes us evil. However, others argue society is not only good, but needed to control our inhumane and animalistic tendencies. One of the most famous believers in this theory is English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes.
