ipl-logo

Can Your Environment Increase The Likelihood Of Violent Behavior

1463 Words6 Pages

Can your environment increase the likelihood of violent behavior?
What has the greatest impact on human behavior? There are many things that can have a great impact on how a person acts. For example, peer influence, values and beliefs and the environment can have an impact on a person’s behavior. Peer pressure is common among teenagers in high school they begin to develop, and the people around them have great influences on what they decide. Also, Parental influences, guardians can have had a great influence on who people grow to be. Lastly, your environment or community; where you grow up or live, can influence how people behave. All of these things can increase the likelihood of violent behavior.
Throughout history, people have had different …show more content…

In the case of the Columbine shooting, “It is necessary to distinguish Klebold from Harris. Klebold was a depressed and troubled kid who could who could have been saved. Harris was was an icy killer” (Brooks1). It can be debated that Klebold probably wouldn't have become a killer, but as for Harris he was the killer; As for Klebold and Harris being friends, Harris had a great influence on Klebold. However, others have argued that “Columbine killers Eric and Harris and Dylan Klebold were avid players of the video game Doom which has sold over 3 million copies” (Korach 1). Some may say that violent video games have had a great influence on the Columbine killings because over 4 million copies were sold. That doesn't mean there weren't 4 million school shootings after those copies were sold. This proves that the teens had a greater influence on each other than the game did. Additionally, many have tried to prove that peer influence has is a contribution to increasing violent behavior by stating, “The influence of peers and their acceptance of delinquent behavior is significant..”(Korach 1) Proving that youth are more susceptible to delinquent behavior, or even that they are influencing each other to be delinquents. Some may say that peer influence has nothing to do with the increase in the likelihood of violent behavior, It can be argued that physical features are a factor in the likelihood of …show more content…

For instance, “The emotional involvement of parents really does matter and affects the outcome of their child’s emotional competence and regulation”(Murphy1). This means that the parent and child connection can have a direct influence on how the child acts emotionally. Some can argue against the statement: “Discipline is the process of teaching your child what type of behavior is acceptable”(Steinberg 1). This means that parents use discipline to form the child's behavior and teach the child right from wrong. Lack of discipline can increase the likelihood of violent behavior because of the parent's lack of involvement and discipline. Also, “Children suffer badly from divorce or parental breakup, and those brought up by a single parent are more likely to do badly. And fall into crime”(Steve1). This shows that broken home has a great influence on a child so much that it can affect them are they grow. Then some have argued against that “The children often grew up with adult responsibilities, covering for an absent parent”(Steve1). In some absent parent environments, children don't become bad and they take on more responsibility. Responsibility alone can have an effect on how the child behaves, some become violent to the present parent because of increase in responsibilities and lack of playtime. Lastly, research has shown that “Mothers who believe their children have more power than they do

Open Document