ipl-logo

Capital Punishment Without Parole Essay

1937 Words8 Pages

Capital Punishment:
Abolition and Implementation of Life Imprisonment without Parole as Alternative

Introduction As a means of punishment, we denounce the assault of those who have assaulted their compatriots. We condemn the torture of those who have tortured their fellow beings. We completely disavow the rape of those who have raped individuals weaker than them. Then, why is it that we condone the murder of those who have murdered? Capital punishment, also known as death penalty, is the court-ordered execution of a criminal offender who committed a capital crime such as murder. “The infliction of death for the purpose of retribution has been a facet of human existence since earliest times,” according to Henderson (2006, p. 5). It has even …show more content…

What exactly does it mean to deter a crime? Deterrence refers to how individuals of a community may be dissuaded by the punishment strategies of a particular society for delinquent and harmful actions (Henderson, 2006, p.14). Most proponents of capital punishment cite deterrence as the main reason against eradicating the penalty. They might even mention econometrician research dating back to the 1970s, conducted by Isaac Ehrlich and one of his students, Stephen Layson, which somehow show that capital punishment has a conspicuously deterrent effect on crime rates. As mentioned by Bedau and Cassell (2004), the research pioneered by Ehrlich and continued by Layson has often been discredited and publicly criticized in print media (p. 38). Therefore, barring this invalid study, no research, to date, has managed to yield findings of the death penalty having more of a deterrent effect than life imprisonment. This fact has also been corroborated by Amnesty International in their report Death Sentences and Executions 2014, where they claim that, “there is no evidence that the death penalty has a greater deterrent effect on crime than terms of imprisonment” (Lancet, 2015, p. 1262). This is due to the fact that many variables out of our control may as well be responsible for the fluctuations in crime rates. However, as many abolitionists emphasize, deterrence is best achieved by the assurance of retribution rather than the harshness of the penalty (Henderson, 2006, p. 15). Fear incited by the capital punishment is reduced by the time lag between conviction and administration of punishment, in addition to the fact that most executions take place behind closed doors, as mentioned in Henderson (2006, p. 15). Furthermore, as per the views of Borg and Radelet (2000), those who commit crimes do

Show More
Related
1997 Words | 8 Pages

While many opponents argue the economics of the issue, they fail to acknowledge that the main goals of punishment are to correct behavior that is deviant from the law and to prevent similar incidences from occurring. Without capital punishment, the culprits would not have to confront the potential of death, meaning that the marginal cost of violent crime would be diminished. Therefore, capital punishment is an effective method to deter

Read More
1590 Words | 7 Pages

Capital punishment is the legalized killing of criminal offenders based on the severity of the crime. We can trace capital punishment as far back to the eighteenth century. The King of Babylon, Hammaurdi wrote a set of codes for twenty-five crimes. If they were broken you could be killed. Killing during this time was more severe than it is now.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Currently, the death sentence is only applied to those who commit murder, however, in the past, it has also been used for rape and armed robbery. Arguing in favor it can seem justifiable to take the life of a person who unjustifiably took the life of someone else. And with murder being the only way to be sentenced to the death penalty it seems fitting. Along with that, it provides deterrence from committing murder for possibly many people. The deterrence that execution provides is a debated topic nested into another controversial topic.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

This is because the offenders would perceive execution to be more severe that life imprisonment. This indicates that deterrence is effective in the modern American criminal justice

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

The dictionary meaning of capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. The purposes for the use of capital punishment vary from retribution to deterrence (National Police Committee). Retribution would only come into play when the same amount of pain the victim has suffered is given to the criminal as punishment. Deterrence, on the other hand, according to the National Police Committee, implies a utilitarian purpose. Specific and general are two forms of deterrence (National Police Committee).

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Capital punishment, or the death penalty is the execution of an individuals life as a punishment for criminal conviction is currently criminalized in Canada, although should be decriminalized. The act of capital punishment officially became illegal in 1962 when Robert Turpin and Arthur Lucas were the last individuals to be executed in Canada.(Victims of Violence,2016) Since 1962 capital punishment has been a controversial topic with arguments about morals, justice and human rights. capital punishment serves as a deterrent for criminals, provides retribution and makes society safe. Punishment is necessary for extreme criminal cases including first degree murder and serious sexual offences such as rape.

Read More
2030 Words | 9 Pages

Death penalty is a type punishment sentence that is giving to a person who commits a serious crime, and is put to death. If somebody knew that their actions would lead to death, it could possibly make them rethink their crime. Writer Evelle, Younger wrote the article Capital Punishment: The people's mandate, which talks about people's point of views on capital punishment: “The death penalty will save lives, so I’d like to have it restored as soon as possible.” There will always be a few mistakes in a court ruling, and sometimes the innocent inmates do not get lucky, but taking chances to save other people in this country is a chance a lot of judges are willing to take. Today America has high power technology that prevents innocent people going to the death row let alone jail.

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

What is the definition of the death penalty? Well the definition varies from person to person but the most known phrase associated with the “Death Penalty” is Capital Punishment. It is the act of legally executing someone for doing wrong in society; such as the act of rape or even murder. Throughout time the death penalty has made a drastic impact on the United States. But when and how did the death penalty rise into the issue it is today?

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

Is it really possible that a killer will be more deterred by the risk of the death penalty than by having to spend the rest of his life in prison? The claim fails the test of common sense. Criminologists and police chiefs say the death penalty just doesn't influence murderers -- partly because its application is so haphazard. Although some people say the purpose of punishment is not only just to deter but also to retribute. However, this does not justify the idea that a person should be killed because of killing other just like a rapist should also be rapped.

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

Capital punishment is the lawful deprivation of life upon a person as a punishment, usually for a serious criminal offense. In developed countries, the death penalty is always replaced by a trial. Execution can only be performed by an authorized representative of the state, otherwise, this action is considered murder which is punishable by the law. In many cases, the capital punishment is replaced by life imprisonment or a long-term imprisonment by court orders. On rare occasions, a person sentenced to death by a court can be pardoned by the highest state or state official (president, monarch, the prime minister, etc.).

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Many believe that executing criminals is a way to protect them from future crimes. Although it may seem to be a logical reason, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty decreases crime. In my opinion the death penalty is an outdated ancient form of punishment. It is also considered to be immoral to some religions, for example in the Bible it says: “Whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death.” (Exodus 21:12).

Read More
1355 Words | 6 Pages

What this means is that by getting rid of the threat, which is the murderer, a crime could be stopped before it begins. However, this is not to say that just because somebody committed a crime, they should be sent to death row. Robert Blecker stated, "Vicious murderers, who prey on the helpless and vulnerable, once captured, become perfectly well behaved ‘inmates' they get transferred from maximum- to medium-security" in his article "The Death Penalty Needs to Be an Option for Punishment" in http://www.nytimes.com. When actual, dangerous criminals are sent to jail instead of capital punishment their personalities transform. They become better persons and slowly work their way into having fun or even back to the open

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

And states that have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates. The death penalty has no deterrent effect. Claims that each execution deters a certain number by social of murders have been thoroughly discredited by social science research.” Not to mention, but along with not repressing crime, the death penalty has been proven to be racially

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

Read More

More about Capital Punishment Without Parole Essay

Related Topics

Open Document