ipl-logo

Captain Miller's Code Of Kantian Ethics

659 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Military leadership philosophies

Alec Piotrowski
Mr. Harrington
SMJ Block B
21 February 2023
Kant Essay
Kantian Ethics is a moral philosophy emphasizing the importance of rationality, duty, and the categorical imperative in determining the morality of actions. Fundamental principles include the universal law formulation, which states that one should only act according to maxims that can be consistently willed as universal laws, and the humanity formulation, which requires treating others as ends in themselves and not merely as means. Kant's theory evaluates moral good and evil based on adherence to these principles rather than the consequences of an action. In the case of Captain Miller, the moral act involves deciding whether to follow orders or prioritize the life of a single …show more content…

Miller's decision to prioritize the mission over the individual soldier's life is a moral duty. Still, if all military leaders were to prioritize missions over personal lives, it could lead to a world where human life is devalued. This may not be a consistent universal law, as it could cause harm to society. Next, we examine the humanity formulation, which requires treating others as ends in themselves. By prioritizing the mission, Captain Miller may be using the soldier to achieve a lot, disregarding his value as a human being. However, it could also be argued that the mission's success would save many more lives, thus promoting the greater good. In conclusion, Captain Miller's decision is morally complex, and whether it aligns with Kantian Ethics depends on one's interpretation of the categorical imperative and the balance between duty and …show more content…

First, the principle of universalizability suggests that his decision could be considered ethically acceptable if everyone could act similarly in the same situation. In the movie, Captain Miller prioritizes the mission over individual lives, demonstrating a commitment to the greater good that, if universally applied, could lead to a more just and peaceful world. Second, Captain Miller's actions reflect treating others as ends in themselves. By valuing the mission and the potential to save countless lives, he shows respect for the inherent worth of each person involved. Finally, as a legislator in a kingdom, Miller's decision aligns with the moral law, as he is motivated by duty, not personal desires or

Show More
Related
1651 Words | 7 Pages

Even though “modernity has established the norm of individual integrity…it should be obvious…that the experience of [the 20th] century has done much to undermine this norm” (Forché 44). All of the previously discussed examples elude to this aspect by showing the disparity between the soldier’s actions and his morality. However, it is most prevalent when considering the soldier’s need to achieve moral dissonance in order to carry out his duty. Even though he knew killing was morally wrong, his particular circumstances forced him to disregard his morality in order to

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

“When you choose an action, you choose the consequences of that action”. In the book/story “Into the wild”. Chris McCandless is not justified in leaving his family to go into the wild without a trace because he wasted resources and importantly police time and Alaska troopers' time because we're looking for Chris for a long time. Also, he was not safe because all the people he met told him that he should go prepared for Alaska and he ignored the people and ignored the dangers of Alaska. Also, Chris was not sane or mentally stable because he believed that civilization is poison and he burned his money and buried most of his stuff, and left his car before going into the wild.

Read More
1202 Words | 5 Pages

This farthest reaching placement of responsibility on U.S. military strategy elaborates on Caputo’s description of disillusionment from the number of people dying for no evident progress and provides one focus for his observation of what might be preventable about warfare. In describing his resistance to listen to more experienced officers, Caputo recognizes that communicating the risks and trauma of warfare requires precise description and a willingness to listen; “They had already been where we were going, to that frontier between life and death, but none of us wanted to listen to them. So I guess every generation is doomed to fight its war, to endure the same old experiences, suffer the loss of the same old illusions, and learn the same old lessons on its own.” The structure of the vicarious tour of duty is an attempt to communicate the same old experiences, illusions, and lessons as they appeared for servicemen in the American War, but by Caputo’s own acknowledgement this attempt is destined to fail because its lesson cannot be fully understood without direct

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Jeff McMahan probes the morally-provocative question, “is morally permissible for an individual to join the armed forces if he will thereby become an “unjust combatant?” I will present two arguments to debate this question, epistemic justification and pacifism. I will implore the use of Reserve Police Battalion 101 as a historical example to support my conclusion that epistemic justification, or the moral permissibility for a man to join the armed forces in defense of an unjust cause, as the stronger of the two arguments. Before progressing any further, it is imperative to have a foundational understanding of “just combatants” and “unjust combatants,” as McMahan understands theses terms.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Macey Martin English 2P Ms. Kilba 05/12/2023 Night Synthesis Throughout history, individuals have faced the moral dilemma of whether or not to help those in danger. While some argue that it is a moral obligation to help others in need, others believe it is not always the individual's responsibility. After analyzing “Night”, "First They Came For the Communists”, "The Perils of Indifference”, and a couple of others' thoughts, it is evident that individuals have a moral obligation to help others who are in danger, regardless of their own personal circumstances. Whether it is a matter of life or death, our human nature compels us to act compassionately and offer assistance.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

The point is further established when Colonel Read states, “War is never fair. Who chooses which men get killed and which ones don’t?” (Collier and Collier 200). Warfare comes at a cost, and one never knows who will pay it. By the same token, the authors stress that as long as the fighting goes on only unfair consequences will

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Would you do the right thing even if it meant putting yourself in danger? Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn were in a graveyard trying to get rid of their warts, with the help of a dead cat and a evil, rich man’s grave, and they came upon three men entering the graveyard. These men were Dr. Robinson, Injun Joe and Muff Potter. They were there to steal the gold in the very grave, but a fight busted out between them and Injun Joe killed Dr. Robinson after Potter was knocked unconscious. Once Muff Potter woke up, Injun Joe convinced the confused drunk that he had blacked out and killed Dr. Robinson.

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

it’s better than doing what’s wrong therefore the person will create a positive impact. Throughout the story, we learn that one always has a chance to make the right decision.

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Williams transitions from this example into the discussion of something he calls “the precedent effect”. The fear of this effect is that certain horrendous utilitarian acts might encourage people to behave immorally because of the precedent that may be set by these actions. Even though Williams admits that the precedent effect would only occur if people where confused as to why utilitarian’s had to commit a horrendous act, Williams believes that this confusion is a very real possibility if utilitarianism is ever used in

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

Hunter previously states that; “the true nature of war is to serve itself and leave the world destroyed.” While Captain Frank Ramsey, rose through the military ranks, to his current position , he takes Hunter’s advice, but does not seem to listen to it because of their backgrounds. When making an ethical decision, many factors affect the process. In this example, it is pressure from your peers, the men on board, the military, and the people of the united states the swore to protect.

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

Where our choices should include everyone, as universal to be considered moral or immoral. His choice would be based on the common sense rather than what one feels on the time on having to choose. Kant believes in continuacion of life, where maintaining life is a moral action. In Rescue I we have to see who really is in danger, where all 6 people are in danger, how can you morally save five and kill one. We will have to follow one of the two wills which are autonomous: morality of respect to us having free will and heteronomous: respecting others morality.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

One example that Ross gives is the keeping of a promise an individual made to someone not because it will promote the most happiness at the end, but because the individual had already made the promise and feels an innate duty to uphold it (128). Ross argues that people possess common sense because it is what lets an individual realize that they have more than one “conditional” duty in a situation. It allows that individual to favor the action of one duty more over the action of the

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Enlightenment like any great cultural change took time to develop. It all started in the eighteenth century. It was the time when numerous and various philosophers and intellectual thinkers emerged. The main disagreement on enlightenment is between established religious beliefs and values and a developing scientific body that is grounded, not by the will of god but by empirical evidence. Also it is important to note that the way in which true enlightenment is currently rationalized and thought about is very Western.

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

He says that one must act not only in accordance to duty, but for the sake of duty However, According to the Utilitarianism, Mill emphasizes that the actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness Immanuel Kant is the founder of the Kantian branch of ethics and morality, and his theories are personally my favorite theory of ethics so far. According to the utilitarianism, the best action is the one that maximizes utility. However, in Kant’s moral philosophy, people

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

In other words, if a person acts only out of duty and not self-interest, their action is morally justifiable regardless of what the consequence may be. As you can see, this belief is different from the utilitarian who mainly focuses on the end result of an act or the consequences of the

Read More

More about Captain Miller's Code Of Kantian Ethics

Related Topics

Open Document