I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiff, Jessica Kemper, was injured at a Toledo Mud Hens game when an intoxicated fan, Daniel Kolleng, hit Jessica Kemper with a small wooden bat. An employee of the Toledo Mud Hens served alcohol to Kolleng when he was already intoxicated. Jessica Kemper contends this motion is made upon the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material facts. Therefore, Jessica Kemper is entitled to judgment as matter of law on her claim.
As seen in previous cases like Tinker vs. Des Moines, students have the right to political say, unless it causes disruption at school of students are promoting something that goes against the law. In the case of Tinker v Des Moines the students were not promoting anything illegal but showed their thought on the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands (Tinker). Argued in court by Kenneth W. Starr in the Morse v. Frederick case, he gave the idea that the foundation for school censorship was the case of Tinker v. Des Moines (Morse). The Justices responded back saying, that case was a different scenario as the students weren 't doing anything against the law while Frederick was encouraging the use of marijuana which was illegal (Morse).
The way the human brain works is marvelous, but often people alter the reality of a situation making false accusations and statements. Ronald Cotton was accused of breaking into Jennifer Thomson-Cannino home and sexually assaulting her. They both lived
1. What was the legal issue in this case? What did the NLRB decide? This case is based on 26 former employees of MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc. (MasTec), who sued the company alleging that their employment were terminated after an appearance on a TV news show, complaining about unfair new pay formula and the instructions to lie to the customers in order to meet with the telephone lines installations rates. As is mentioned in the textbook in the MasTec Advanced Technologies' case, the new pay formula indicate that the technicians would be paid $2 less for basic and additional outlet installations, but would earn $3.35 for each receiver they connected to phone line.
Where is the harm in this case? Although the judicial assistant was wrong to be discussing the case with his friend especially in a public place. 2. Could Cartwright successfully sue Judge Barnes for libel? If Judge Barnes made the comments in the elevator to Mack Jones, her assistant that Cartwright lied about not shoplifting, and Cartwright can prove he did not steal, then yes.
He experienced mental trauma and distress as a result of the incident and sued for assault. That is why, Cullison brought a claim of assault against the Medleys and the trial court entered summary judgment. 2. Legal issues 2.1. Did Earnest commit an assault against the plaintiff?
The caregivers lacked commitment, compassion, conscientiousness, fairness and honesty, and if they had taken their jobs seriously probably Tomcik wouldn’t have suffered as much. Trial began on July 22, 1991 and the decision was made on October 7, 1991. Tomcik’s total damage came out to be $85,000 according to the text. The defendants were proven wrong and they were charged. The court did the right thing, but I think a stricter action should have been taken against the defendants.
Introduction A case was reported in the California civil courts where Dawn Diaz sustained injuries after she was hit by a car that geared of the freeway after colliding with a truck. Diaz sued Karen Tagliaferri, the car driver and Jose Carcamo the truck driver, working for Sugar Transport for the damages. Besides, Carcamo’s employer was also sued on the basis that the employer was vicariously liable for the damages, and the company was negligent for hiring and retaining Carcamo. The jury ruled that the defendant was guilty and would meet a fee of $22,566,373 for damages sustained by Diaz and fault was apportioned to Tagliaferri, Carcamo, and Sugar Transport Company.
To support this argument, he implied that the fact that Flynt republished the ad multiple times proved the intent of Flynt. In contrast with Isaacman who referred to New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to support his argument, Grutman suggested that the ruling was irrelevant with Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell. Although Falwell could win under the ruling when the issue considered was libel involving factual statements, emotional harm based on intent was the main issue considered by Falwell. To withhold the tort of emotional distress that was ruled as invalid in a recent decision, Grutman defended it by saying that the decision was made by an inferior court, he did not view it as a good law, and there were other cases which supported the tort.
In Nothing But The Truth, Philip Malloy received suspension after being removed from class for "singing" the national anthem, The Star-Spangled Banner, during the morning announcements. Throughout the story of Nothing But The Truth, the media supports Philip more than the school district, but if the "truth" turned into a court case, who would be successful, Philip Malloy v. Harrison School District? Philip Malloy would be effective in taking the court case because he was not trying to cause a disturbance in Ms. Narwin's homeroom class. In the novel, Philip states“ Yeah. Right.
In June 21, 1973, Miller was convicted on the ground of advertising the sale of what was considered by the court as adult material. He was found guilty as he broke the California Statute. The California Statute forbids citizens from spreading what is considered offensive in societal standards. The question that was being asked was that if the action of Miller was Constitution thus is protected under the law. However, he lost the case due to a vote of 5 - 4.
Reportedly, the judge dismissed Hill 's defamation lawsuit because he found that the evidence her lawyers provided didn 't support a claim of defamation according to Pennsylvania law. Cosby and his lawyers called the accusations were "innuendos" and that "people should fact-check" before accusing him of anything. Camille Cosby, Bill Cosby 's wife of fifty years, wrote a letter to the Washington Post, claiming that media outlets failed to properly vet Cosby 's accusers before publishing their accusations. Despite their dismissals, Bill Cosby, his wife, and his legal team never outright accused the women of lying or attempting to extort Bill Cosby, so there was no finding of defamation.
Imagine meeting that perfect person and falling in love, but because of the person 's skin color, you cannot marry them. This is true for Mildred and Richard Loving. They went to Washington D.C. to get married because they knew it was legal there, and when returning to your home to Virginia they were arrested and put in jail. They were arrested because Richard was caucasian and Mildred was African American. They met when they were young and began a relationship; when Mildred became pregnant at 18, they decided to get married.
This law convicted about fourteen people, mostly Republican writers and newspaper editors (and one drunk who was
Simpson’s case. According to Ogletree Jr., the media tainted the evidence of the case making some of the most relevant facts of the trial less necessary. Journalists did not care much about the criminal justice system within the country. The media gave a platform for people to give views on a case that was on trial whether the information they provided was credible or not. The involvement of the media compromised the access of witnesses, as fewer people were willing to be involved in the public scandal by testifying.
