More handpicked essays just for you.
Students and freedom of speech
Tinker v. des moines independent community
Tinker v des moines and tinker argument
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The wore black armbands in a protest against the government policies during the Vietnam war. The Tinkers tries to fight the suspension with the district court but the district court was in favor with the school so the Thinkers had to take it further. The next step was to take it to the supreme court. The tinkers took it to the Supreme court and the majority vote wat that it was unconstitutional for the school to
The students were asked to remove the armbands by school officials and when the students refused they were suspended. The concern is that the students First Amendment Rights were violated, specifically their free speech. The Des Moines, IA school district argued that the students First Amendment Rights were not violated because their actions created a disruption to the school environment. The parents appealed the school district’s decision through each of the federal courts and ultimately, landed at the US Supreme court.
Freedom of speech must always be used to an extent. We may not allow students in schools to say whatever they please without any consequence. Also, as we are siding with the Tinkers, we must not send the wrong message to students. We are not displaying that whenever a student has a stance, to go against the school’s government and to make this a national ordeal.
While reading the novel Fahrenheit 451, i realized the author, Ray Bradbury described the role of censorship by putting together the personal freedom that one person has, to the freedom of expression that person was giving. Bradbury describes the right of the First Amendment and the rights we have as a human being. The First Amendment is about the freedom of speech that one person has for themselves. Once a man named Justice Holmes, said the meaning of the First amendment was “freedom for what we hate.” A role of censorship was played by sending a very direct or forward message that tells readers what may or may not happen if they allow the government to take control of what they do or do not read.
In Derek Bok’s, Protecting Freedom of Expression On The Campus, he brings light to the issue of censorship in universities. He states that students at Harvard University got offended after a few students displayed the confederate flag. There have been many cases in which people have tried to censor offensive material however; the Supreme Court preferred to conserve the freedom of expression. He believes that if censorship starts to take place, it will be difficult to know when to cross the line. In addition, it will not fix the initial problem since the offenders will continue to abuse others using different means.
One must have evidence that a disturbance has been make. Fear cannot take away freedom. In one of the court cases mentioned, it says, “the vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools,” (13). This is saying that our constitutional freedoms are most valuable in American school communities. The freedom of expression is one of the reasons that makes America a superior country.
“The last time I was at Munchy’s, ALL the noise came from loud, annoying business people who were either on their cells or arguing with each other.” This quote proves that the students are not the only ones making the noise so they should not be the one to blame. The issue at hand affects all teenagersin school since the supposed banned is against all teenagers. Even though the ban was only brought up that one day all the noisy teens were there. Even though Munchy’s want to ban teenagers because they are loud, Munchy’s should not ban teenagers from going because business owners are equally loud, make more money during the fall, and it is a violation of their civil rights.
In public I can speak or express my feelings minimal restrictions. As for in a school zone I am not always available to do so. This where the amendment does not have 100% full affect. It has restrictions as to where you are, what you say, and what actions are taken after saying these things. There are plenty of restrictions as to what i can say, talk about, or wear.
Common curriculum in Schools teach students their first amendment rights however schools themselves take the steps to block public information on computers that students should be able to access. Public schools teach Constitutional rights in America, yet every school uses Internet blocker programs the prevent students’ free access to information. All public schools are required to teach a civics class yet these schools restrict the first amendment from students on the Internet. A common debate is whether or not schools should be allowed to censor information posted on the internet from their students. Students have the right to freedom of the press even if that means the information is biased or otherwise “classified” harmful.
Censorship in schools concentrates on creating a non-beneficial and unhelpful learning environment for students. Americans should be aware that textbooks often only present a positive image of US history because it doesn’t tell the truth about how we came to be as a nation. In Denver, Colorado, students are protesting about a review of the AP history curriculum which
Canadians are so used to this concept of freedom of speech that the government barely even bats an eyelash when it comes protests, democracy or change. A lot of Canadians take this for granted and some are even shocked when they hear that other people in the world get killed for speaking their mind. This culture of freedom has instilled an entitlement into Canadians even from when they were young, my daughter included. My daughter Sophie has grown up living a very privileged life, and sometimes look back and I’m amazed at the differences between our childhoods.
In 1969, the U.S. Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District upheld the right to freedom of speech of students to protest the Vietnam war by wearing black armbands. The case explained the problem that “students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” (Student) As students, we are free to express ourselves through what we wear. As students, we have every right to proclaim our beliefs
Most things, however, are better left purely factual and whole. We are guaranteed freedom from censorship in the first amendment, which gives us the freedom of the press, freedom of expression, and more. A Supreme Court case called Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969), was a case about freedom of expression. In summary, the school district tried to censor the protest of the Vietnam war, and the students and their parents sued the school board. Tinker and her friends won, insuring freedom of expression to a degree.
The idea of free speech on college campuses and the complications of it stem from those on campuses expressing views that don’t align with popular views. Implications for students who use the idea of free speech as a method for hateful actions and comments should be reprimanded, but the question remains as to whether schools should enforce tougher limitations. The freedom of speech on college campus expands to the freedoms of religion, assembly, press, and protest as well. Freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views. Removing freedoms of speech and expression have consequences deeper than surface issues.
Censorship is anything that curbs freedom of expression. It stems from authority and functions to silence what the authority finds disturbing and transgressive, therefore, subject to control. It has often been observed that the reasons of censorship are mainly the desire to retain political power, upholding theological dogmas and maintaining moral standard of the community. And censors often claim to restrict speech, writing or image they find contrary to such long-held beliefs or harmful enough for suppression. Further, it is also important to understand that censorship is not only an after effect of the act of expression.
