ipl-logo

Case Brief Procedural History Of Smallwood V State 680

654 Words3 Pages

Smallwood v. State
680 A.2d 512 (MD. 1996)
Procedural History: Dwight Ralph Smallwood, the defendant, was charged for rape in the first-degree, robbery with a deadly weapon, reckless endangerment, and assault with intent to murder. The defendant was also charged on a separate indictment for attempted murder in the second degree to his three victims each. The defendant pled guilty on October 11, 1994 to the charges of rape in the first-degree and robbery with a deadly weapon in the Prince George's County's Circuit Court. The circuit court had convicted the defendant to the charges of assault with intent to murder, all three counts of second-degree murder and reckless endangerment. The second-degree murder charges were based on his attack on …show more content…

His records indicated, by the Prince George's County Detention Center, he was informed of being infected with the virus on September 25, 1991. He was given instruction by a social worker on February of 1992 to practice “safe sex.” so that the virus would not spread to any sexual partner. Smallwood informed healthcare providers of the Children's hospital, on July of 1993, that he had always used a condom and that he had only one sexual partner. He was tested again for the HIV virus on both February and March in 1994. Smallwood and an accomplice had robbed a woman a woman at gunpoint and raped her in a secluded place on September 26, 1993. Two days later, Smallwood and an accomplice robbed another woman at gunpoint and raped her in a secluded place. Smallwood inserted his penis with “slight penetration.” Smallwood and an accomplice robbed a third woman at gunpoint at a local school. Smallwood forced her to perform oral sex and raped her after. Smallwood had threatened to kill all three victims if they did not cooperate as well as threaten to kill them if they report him. Smallwood did not use any form of protection (such as a condom) while performing any of these acts.
Issue: Whether the courts lacked sufficient evidence to convict Smallwood of intent to kill his three

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier

1910 Words | 8 Pages

In Hazelwood East High School in St. Louis, Missouri Journalism Ⅱ students produced a newspaper. In which the principal deemed two pages infelicitous. In order to ensure the publication of the school paper on time, the principal deleted those two pages. Upon the delivery of the paper at the end of the year, Cathy Kuhlmeier filed a lawsuit in January 1984. The Supreme Court case of Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier was a dispute involving the Journalism Ⅱ staff members in Hazelwood East High School in St. Louis versus the school board over the deletion of their hard worked two pages.

Read More

Summary Of Morgan V Sate

782 Words | 4 Pages

Citation: Morgan v Sate, 537 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1989) Facts: James A. Morgan, the appellant, who at sixteen was diagnosed as organically brain-damaged and brain-impaired, murdered the elderly woman with whom he was employed to perform manual labor. Morgan is described as a teenage alcoholic, who since the age of four sniffed gasoline on a regular basis.

Read More

Us Vs Wannoskia Case Study

536 Words | 3 Pages

The defendant wife’s friend, Menarco stated that Linda had an argument earlier in the day with her husband, Elward Roe Wanoskia. Linda later on headed home and argued with Wanoskia and after all that, Linda was shot. The defendant testified that his wife shot herself after the argument. At trial, the government sought to show by expert testimony and a demonstration that the defendant’s wife didn’t shoot herself. The demonstration was all based in the length of an individual’s arm to see how far away your arm can be to shoot yourself in the head.

Read More

Case Brief State Of Oregon Vs Harris

569 Words | 3 Pages

Issue Case name: State of Oregon vs Kenneth James Harris, October 19th, 2017 Facts of the case: In the case there were two parties, one party including the defendant, Kenneth James Harris, and the State of Oregon. The dispute is based on the state of Oregon issuing a subpoena for the witness to come to trial for the case of the defendant, however, the witness failed to do so and was unavailable. The defendant argued that the only way the witness is unavailable is if the state did everything in their power to try to get the witness to court. The only thing the state did was provide the victims recording of the 9-1-1 call from the incident. Issue: Could the State of Oregon done more to produce the witness at trial?

Read More

James Kimball Case Study

582 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. James Kimball, at 23 years old, was a school bus driver who pursued a 15 year old student he’d known for two years. Eventually their “flirtatious” relationship escalated to a “single-sexual encounter” on or about October 3, 1991. The relationship was brought to light by the parents of the child henceforth urging Mr. Kimball to plead guilty to one count of statutory rape in 1992, where the judge then imposed a withheld judgment with a three year probation. After that, Mr. Kimball was accordingly put on the Sex Offender Registry. Due to the essence of the given facts and case report, the disparity in time from the crime to the present, and the technicality of the psychosexual evaluator’s report, I would not have aired the story on Mr.James Kimball.

Read More

Woods V State 2d 22 (1973)

738 Words | 3 Pages

Id. There was no evidence presented by the prosecution that the defendants knew about the drugs or even knew that there was a cooler in the cargo area. Id. at 806. The prosecution cited no authority for the proposition that a jury could infer knowledge of the drugs because of employment status. Id. at 807. The court reasoned that the occupants’ stories were not inconsistent and that knowing the owner does not lead a reasonable person to infer that the defendants knew the drugs were in the cooler.

Read More

Murder Case Against Adnan Syed

374 Words | 2 Pages

Murder Case Against Adnan Syed In 1999, a murder case spiked the enthusiasm of the community of Baltimore, Maryland. Hae Min Lee was the victim of this unforgettable murder which brought together three main suspects: Adnan Syed, Jay Wilds, and Don; however, Don and Hae had only been together thirteen days prior to the murder. This rose suspicion in the case but for some reason was not analyzed as much as it should have been. Don did not have a solid alibi during that day, but he was thrown out the window.

Read More

How Does Floyd Respond To The Clutter Case

440 Words | 2 Pages

The McNaughton rule was used, and it is “the ancient British importation which contends that if the accused knew the nature of his act, and knew it was wrong, then he is mentally competent and responsible for his actions” (Capote, 169-170). The opposition, those on the state’s side, supported its use as they believed it would prevent a “temporary insanity” (Capote, 169) ruling. It was upheld, largely as it was the custom in Kansas at that time. However, the doctor who came to evaluate Dick and Perry believes that Dick is most likely healthy, but that Perry was most likely mentally ill, “his present personality structure is very nearly that of a paranoid schizophrenic reaction,” (Capote, 189). Dr. Jones had a colleague of his evaluate Perry, and they both agree that Perry seems to be of a sort of murderer that is capable of logical thought, but is not always capable of logical action.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Roper Vs Hammons

283 Words | 2 Pages

Roper v. Simmons After reviewing several different opinions regarding the Supreme Court’s verdict in the Roper v. Simmons case, I agree with their final decision. There are many pros and cons when it comes to condemning a juvenile to death row or life imprisonment without parole. I believe that each case is unique and the penalty should depend upon the severity of the crime and how it was committed. In addition, an individual’s age, mental health status and genetics need to be considered when sentencing an appropriate punishment. In Simmons case, I think that he knew exactly what he was doing at the time when he murdered Mrs. Cook.

Read More

The Supreme Court Case Of Roper V. Simmons 543 US 551

593 Words | 3 Pages

In reviewing the Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons 543 U.S. 551 (2005), we review the allegation of the violation of the Eighth Amendment in the trial court’s use of cruel and unusual punishment in its sentencing of Christopher Simmons; who was a juvenile at the time of the crime; to a sentence of death. In reviewing the facts of the case, we find that Christopher Simmons, then 17 and a junior in high school, along with Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, planned the commission of a burglary with the intent to commit murder under the perception that they were minors and as such would be able to get away with the crimes. Upon his capture, Simmons, admitted to the crimes and provided law enforcement with the details of the crimes. Because of his age and the nature of the crime, Simmons was considered to be

Read More

DNA Still Seeks Justice

250 Words | 1 Pages

In the article, “Family of Man Cleared by DNA Still Seeks Justice,” Wade Goodwyn writes about the rape of Michele Mallin and the confession that sets free a wrongly convicted man. Timothy Cole, a student in Lubbock was arrested and convicted as the Texas Tech rapist based on the eyewitness account of one victim. On Sunday night, March 24th, 1985, Michele Mallin, a college sophomore at the time, needed to move her vehicle to a legal parking spot after forgetting to earlier that day. At around 10pm, after finishing moving her car, a man appeared asking her for jumper cables to fix his broke down car. Mallin recalls him pushing her back into her own car, threatening to kill her with a knife and chain-smoking the entire time during the attack.

Read More

Marcellus Williams Didn T Die But Others Will Essay

1710 Words | 7 Pages

Ellie Meriggioli Amendment 8 Wisconsin State Journal, “Marcellus Williams Didn’t Die but Others Will,” August 28, 2017, page A9. This article is about a man named Marcellus Williams. Marcellus was supposed to be pumped with poison and die. But just hours before planned death penalty the governor of Missouri, Eric Greitens called it off to review his case again. Marcellus was on trial for the murder of Lisha.

Read More

The Supreme Court Case Of Kirk L. Odom

1146 Words | 5 Pages

Kirk L. Odom, a convicted Washington D.C. man who served 22 years in prison, for a crime that Odom did not commit. Back in 1981, Kirk L. Odom was found guilty by a Supreme Court Judge, for the rape and robbery of a woman, in her apartment, in Washington D.C.. According to the Washington Post, since 2009 he is one of 5 of rape or murder convicts, that have been vacated based on erroneous forensics and testimony by elite FBI hair experts. Also, The Washington Post gives statistics and years, for rape and murder convictions, and who goes about trying to solve them. When the evidence proves the convicted guilty, like Kirk, the inmate should be exonerated and compensated for his time.

Read More

Case: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson

716 Words | 3 Pages

"The State of California versus Scott Lee Peterson (Case number 1056770, 2005)", was an interesting case. This case was interesting because Laci was a very beautiful and seemingly young, friendly, and happily pregnant woman with lots of friends. Her husband, although attractive, had a kind of macho tough guy womanizer type of persona about himself. It is hard to believe or fathom someone being so cruel as to kill their pregnant wife, regardless of their marital problems. Laci came up missing on December 24, of 2002, the day before Christmas.

Read More

R V. Caldwell Case Study

1083 Words | 5 Pages

The case of R v Caldwell was concerned with the law of recklessness and what equates to recklessness in certain circumstances. The defendant had appealed to the House of Lords for his conviction of aggravated criminal damage, however this conviction was maintained. Arising from this decision, ‘Caldwell recklessness’ was formed. This stated that a person is reckless where property is destroyed or damage where: the appellant partakes in an act which creates an apparent risk of destruction or damage of property, or when the appellant formulates an act in where they have not given any thought to the consequences of their act and has continued with the act regardless.

Read More

More about Case Brief Procedural History Of Smallwood V State 680

Related Topics

Open Document