ipl-logo

Case Study: Brady V. United States

506 Words3 Pages

Brady v. United States
397 U.S. 742 (1970)

Intro: The Petitioner plead guilty to kidnapping after his co-defendant decided to confess and testify against him. Whether Brady’s (the petitioner) plea was made voluntarily was the issue.

Relevant Law: “Just because a defendant discovers that the State would have had a weaker case or that they were not going to impose the maximum punishment does not mean that the defendant is allowed by law to disown his statements made in open court.”

Facts: The Petitioner, in 1959, was charged with kidnapping. Because the person Brady had kidnapped later died, he could have been charged with the death penalty. The petitioner, Brady initially pled not guilty. After learning that his co-defendant confessed to the authorities, and would plead guilty and be available to testify against him, Brady decided to plead guilty as well. Before entering his plea, the trial judge questioned him twice about the voluntariness of his plea. Brady was sentenced to fifty years in prison and it was later reduced to thirty. In 1967 looking to take time off of his sentence Brady claimed that his plea of guilty was coerced and that he was pressured by his counsel, who told him he should plead guilty to avoid the death penalty. The District Court of the District of New Mexico denied relief and the Circuit Court concluded that the District Court’s findings were supported by substantial evidence. Specifically approving of the District Court’s finding that petitioner’s plea of guilty was voluntary. …show more content…

But a plea of guilty is not invalid just because entered to avoid the possibility of the death penalty, and here, the petitioner's plea of guilty met the standard of

Show More
Related

Chimel Vs. California Case Study

455 Words | 2 Pages

Title: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.

Read More

Miranda's Confession, Injustice In Pheonix, Arizona

364 Words | 2 Pages

In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Pheonix, Arizona for the kidnapping and raping of a woman. When questioned by police officers, Miranda would eventually give a confession, and sign it, which wasn 't the case.. Before the court, this confession would be used against Miranda, and with it, the implication that it was received voluntarily and with the convicted knowing his rights. Miranda was convicted with a 20-30 year sentence. Upon eventually learning that his confession was obtained unlawfully, Miranda would appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court, asking for an overturn, and when that fell through, would turn to the United States Supreme Court, filing a habeas corpus.

Read More

Case Study: Burwell V. Hobby

1454 Words | 6 Pages

Business Law Case Study Essay: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S (2014) Facts: The Green family runs and owns Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and skills chain that has over 500 stores and they have over 13,000 employees. Other facts of the case are that the Green family has been able to organize the business around the values of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company as told by Biblical principles, one of which is the belief that the utilization of contraception is wicked. Also, the facts show that under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), occupation -founded group health care plans must offer certain sorts of preventative care, for example, FDA-accepted contraceptive approaches.

Read More

Summary Of The Petitioner V. Collins

603 Words | 3 Pages

Collins, 506 U.S. 390). The case was complicated because the state had already met its expenses and burden to prove during trial that the convict was guilty of the capital murder beyond judicious doubt. The presumption of innocence disappears when a person is convicted. According to the petitioner, he claims that the evidence that was not presented in court proved him innocent the verdict notwithstanding.

Read More

Hillside Strangler Argumentative Essay

758 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine that you are taking a brief walk at night with your dog or by yourself and suddenly feel suffocated. The next thing you know, you have become the next victim of a gruesome sexual attack. However, you could never tell your tale because, at the lowest point of this heinous ordeal, you realize that your rapist will now turn into your murderer. This is the case of the Hillside Strangler, a story of two cousins, Angelo Buono and Kenneth Bianchi, and the brutal crimes they were charged with.

Read More

Research Paper On The West Memphis Three

1244 Words | 5 Pages

They filled out the paper work that would release them. The judge had them testify about their education and if they had been under the influence of drugs. The judge made them understand that they did not have to plead guilty. They asserted their innocence but said they were entering the plea on advice of counsel. (Leveritt)

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Brady Rule

910 Words | 4 Pages

Since its establishment in a seminal Supreme Court of the United States decision the Brady Rule, which requires government disclosure of material evidence favorable to defendants in certain circumstances, has become an integral due process right for defendants in criminal trials. In crafting the Brady Rule, however, the Supreme Court did not specify if the rule is also applicable in administrative proceedings. First, this discussion focuses how lower courts have interpreted the Supreme Court’s omission of such a specification to mean the Brady Rule is not applicable in administrative proceedings. Second, this discussion explains how a Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (SECNAVCORB) Policy Letter creates a Brady Rule equivalent that is applicable to Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings because it requires the PEB to disclose to the service members any information, including information beneficial to the service members, it obtains that is not already known by the service members.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Boblit And Brady

1244 Words | 5 Pages

Boblit and Brady were arrested and charged with murder in the first degree. In court Brady stated that although he was an accomplice to the murder he had nothing to do with the physical act of murdering the victim. He testified that Boblit was the one responsible for the horrendous act of murder. Brady’s lawyer tried to defend him to the best of it ability so upon trial his lawyer obtained the sworn testimony of Boblit but a specific part of his testimony was never admitted into court. There was never a fact of omission of guilt admitted on the record by Boblit coping to murder even though his sworn statement admitting to the murders was on July 9,1958.

Read More

Robert Brady Was Pled Not Guilty

155 Words | 1 Pages

In 1959, Robert Brady was charged with kidnapping, which inflicted capital punishment if convicted by the jury. Brady first pled not guilty, but once he learned that his partner in crime agreed to plead guilty and testify against Brady, he later changed his plea of not guilty, to guilty. Brady’s plea was accepted, after being questioned on his voluntariness of the plea, and was sentenced to 50 years in prison, which was later lessened to 30 years. Afterwards, in 1967, Brady requested post-conviction relief stating that under 28 U.S.C 2255, “his guilty plea was not voluntarily given because 1201 (a) persuaded his plea from his counsel… also that the trial judge had not complied with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Brady v.

Read More

Brady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay

390 Words | 2 Pages

The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.

Read More

Inherit The Wind Character Analysis

670 Words | 3 Pages

In the play, “Inherit the Wind” written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee, Bertram Cates goes on trial for teaching “Darwin’s Theory of Evolution” to his story. This created a major case, where humans challenged God’s holy word,. This started a war against humans and the God. During the battle, two of the world’s greatest mind fought against each other, the defence attorney Henry Drummond and the prosecutor attorney Matthew Harrison Brady. From the beginning to the end, the trial was influenced mostly by Brady’s characteristics, successfully leading him to winning the trial.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Conviction

949 Words | 4 Pages

People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

Read More

Guilty Plea Process

244 Words | 1 Pages

The steps in entering a guilty plea is extremely important and the offender must understand the consequences of pleading guilty to a case. The Unites States Supreme Court has held that a guilty plea constitutes a conviction. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure require judges to inform the defendant of the various rights he or she is surrendering by pleading guilty. Additionally, entering a guilty plea must be voluntary and not forced or result of any promises. There must be a factual basis to make sufficient inquiry for the plea.

Read More

Dissociative Identity Disorder Case Study

1302 Words | 6 Pages

One such case was the case of Kenneth Bianchi, also known as “The Hillside Strangler.” Between October 1977 and January 1978, Bianchi and his cousin raped and killed 15 women, leaving them on the hillsides of Glendale-Park area. Bianchi was arrested in October of 1979. During his trial, he attempted an insanity defense, insisting that an “alter” named Steve had done the killing, however, his argument didn’t stand up to experts and Bianchi later changed his plea to guilty to avoid the death penalty. Another case in which the argument has flopped was in the case of Ricardo Caputo.

Read More

Unjust Vexation Case Study

737 Words | 3 Pages

The court shall allow the plea provided the following requisites concur: (a) The lesser offense is necessarily included in the offense charged; and (b) The Plea must be within the consent of both the offended party and the prosecutor. The consent of the offended party will not be required if said party, despite due notice, fails to appear during the arraignment. Section 2 of rule 116 of the Rules of Court present the basic requisites upon which plea bargaining may be made. The rules however, used the word may in the second sentence of Section 2, denoting an exercise of discretion upon the trial court on whether to allow the accused to make such plea.

Read More

More about Case Study: Brady V. United States

Related Topics

Open Document