ipl-logo

Case Study: NCAA Student Athletes

678 Words3 Pages

December Pro:
Zachary Lozano and Hunter Aikmus
Resolved: NCAA student-athletes ought to be recognized as employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Hunter and I stand in firm affirmation of the resolution, Resolved: NCAA student-athletes ought to be recognized as employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. We will support our stance with the following Three contentions.

Contention One: The Current System is Modern Day Slavery
Current forms of compensation are inadequate. Linda Chavez of the New York Post, 29 Mar. 2014 explains part of the situation, College athletes are subjected to a lot of injuries and harms “Most college athletes, however, won’t see those rewards. But nearly all who play football — and, increasingly, …show more content…

It is unjust to coerce people into performing a service without a reasonable compensation. If we simply said that the mere fact that people consent to coercive contracts makes them just, it would be impossible to prevent any exploitation. Cork Gaines of Business Insider 14 Oct. 2016 elaborates on the fact that College Sports Bring in Billions of Dollars, he states “We recently took a look at the schools that make the most money off of college athletics, with Texas A&M topping the list with $192.6 million in revenue,” and “The 231 NCAA Division I schools with data available generated a total of $9.15 billion in revenue during the 2015 fiscal year.” and Greg Johnson of The Nation, 29 Jun. 2015 makes a great point we he states that the NCAA Should run like the free market, he explains “ They should simply be allowed to operate within the free market like anyone else in America. Schools can pay what they want, and athletes should be able to sign endorsements for their own likeness and image. It’s fairly simple. There is no evidence to suggest that athletes being compensated a fairer market value would compromise an educational mission” as we have a moral obligation to pay back athletes for the time they put into their sports, that comes before any argument about the results of the resolution. This is because whether or not we fulfill moral obligations sets a precedent for futures situations in which it is now justified to not pay people their

Show More
Related
905 Words | 4 Pages

Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

In their journal “The Case of Paying College Athletes”, John Siegfried and Allen Sanderson point out many discrepancies in NCAA policies, but do not support monetary payment. They argue: “College athletes are in fact currently paid, in the sense that the majority receive grants-in-aid that cover most – although not all – of their college expenses.” (Pg. 127). After this statement, the authors detail the demanding payments varying depending on each college

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

Prior to this, there’s a more authentic comparison when a company builds a factory in an efficient unformed country; paying its workers pennies but making millions while claiming to be doing them a favor by providing a tremendous opportunity they wouldn't otherwise have, stated by Ethan Thomas. The average annual pay for coaches in this year’s NCAA tournament field is around 1.47 million which is based on 62 out of 68 schools in the field on that the U.S today was able to achieve compensation. Thus far the NCAA continues to oppose paying college athletes to which is a hypocritical case. Some people in our society are yet so naïve that they tend to believe on the reason why the NCAA won’t pay college athletes due to their 100 percent commitment to the monetary worth on education and intellectual insight. Perhaps some college athletes might not qualify for scholarships to which they have to endeavor to support themselves through schooling wise.

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

In the documentary schooled: the price of college sports I learned that the NCAA does not treat student athletes like employees but these students are treated like slaves it all started in 1971 when the young Caucasian man by name of started playing college football for TSU, he was the running back for the team and when he caught the ball in running he was hit by two other players from the opposing team which caused him to be paralyzed for the rest of his life. Most of the players feel that they should be paid for playing college sports but the NCAA believes that a student who gets a full scholarship to play any sport at a university should not be paid because they are being paid with a free education, room, and board, and free meals, the NCAA

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

We as students, professors, and parents we need to demand that NCAA changes their unfair rules and compensates the students athletes for their Annotative bibliography Entman, L. (1970, February 05). Elite college athletes should be paid:

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Reasons Why or Why Not?” author Unknown goes over the NCAA vs. Alston ruling, which is when colleges were given the power to reward their athletes for their name, image, and likeness. They then explain why student athletes are not being paid by their schools, and what a name, image, and likeness agreement is. It is then written how student athlete scholarships actually work and what the difference is between a full versus a partial scholarship. They then list cons of paying college athletes, like how scholarships are the fairest form of compensation for them and how paying athletes diminishes the spirit of

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

With the revenue quickly escalating, college athletes appear more as employees because of the money they are generating for their school program (Berry III,

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

The fight for payment of college athletes has not been quick one as more and more issues keep popping up. The NCAA has never allowed payment of its athletes, but small steps towards the overall goal has questioned the NCAA’s past. Its’ decisions has stayed constant since its founding in 1906. The first issue in this decision would not occur until 1952 when the NCAA ruled to give The University of Kentucky the ‘death penalty’ for paying their athletes. This ‘death penalty’ is a one year program ban from participation, the harshest penalty the NCAA can give.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Statistically showing, at least 100,000 college football players get hurt yearly. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a cent. Every time a football player steps onto the field, they’re risking themselves for injury.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.

Read More

More about Case Study: NCAA Student Athletes

Related Topics

Open Document