Injustice Case for NCAA Players NCAA athletes should be compensated due to their devotion towards extra-curricular schooling along with recreational activities. In the Huffington Post, economist convey that NCAA schools can definitely afford to pay college athletes. Spokeswoman Meghan Durham asserts that only 20 of the approximate 1,100 schools which constitute the NCAA make more from sports than they spend on sports, according to association’s most recent estimates. Rodney Fort, former sports economists…exposes that the money is already there since the NCAA brought about a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year and top tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well. Opponents stated that …show more content…
Prior to this, there’s a more authentic comparison when a company builds a factory in an efficient unformed country; paying its workers pennies but making millions while claiming to be doing them a favor by providing a tremendous opportunity they wouldn't otherwise have, stated by Ethan Thomas. The average annual pay for coaches in this year’s NCAA tournament field is around 1.47 million which is based on 62 out of 68 schools in the field on that the U.S today was able to achieve compensation. Thus far the NCAA continues to oppose paying college athletes to which is a hypocritical case. Some people in our society are yet so naïve that they tend to believe on the reason why the NCAA won’t pay college athletes due to their 100 percent commitment to the monetary worth on education and intellectual insight. Perhaps some college athletes might not qualify for scholarships to which they have to endeavor to support themselves through schooling wise. Likewise, they as well risk for permanent injuries in spite of the danger ahead of them. For instance, what if a professional football athlete gets severely injured by getting his joints ruptured? Would the player have enough money to pay for his own medical