ipl-logo

Summary: Injustice Case For NCAA Players

684 Words3 Pages

Injustice Case for NCAA Players NCAA athletes should be compensated due to their devotion towards extra-curricular schooling along with recreational activities. In the Huffington Post, economist convey that NCAA schools can definitely afford to pay college athletes. Spokeswoman Meghan Durham asserts that only 20 of the approximate 1,100 schools which constitute the NCAA make more from sports than they spend on sports, according to association’s most recent estimates. Rodney Fort, former sports economists…exposes that the money is already there since the NCAA brought about a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year and top tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well. Opponents stated that …show more content…

Prior to this, there’s a more authentic comparison when a company builds a factory in an efficient unformed country; paying its workers pennies but making millions while claiming to be doing them a favor by providing a tremendous opportunity they wouldn't otherwise have, stated by Ethan Thomas. The average annual pay for coaches in this year’s NCAA tournament field is around 1.47 million which is based on 62 out of 68 schools in the field on that the U.S today was able to achieve compensation. Thus far the NCAA continues to oppose paying college athletes to which is a hypocritical case. Some people in our society are yet so naïve that they tend to believe on the reason why the NCAA won’t pay college athletes due to their 100 percent commitment to the monetary worth on education and intellectual insight. Perhaps some college athletes might not qualify for scholarships to which they have to endeavor to support themselves through schooling wise. Likewise, they as well risk for permanent injuries in spite of the danger ahead of them. For instance, what if a professional football athlete gets severely injured by getting his joints ruptured? Would the player have enough money to pay for his own medical

Show More
Related
893 Words | 4 Pages

In their journal “The Case of Paying College Athletes”, John Siegfried and Allen Sanderson point out many discrepancies in NCAA policies, but do not support monetary payment. They argue: “College athletes are in fact currently paid, in the sense that the majority receive grants-in-aid that cover most – although not all – of their college expenses.” (Pg. 127). After this statement, the authors detail the demanding payments varying depending on each college

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

are the only people getting paid while the football, basketball, soccer, tennis players do all the hard work making the NCAA billions of dollars every year studies that were conducted found this to be very disturbing, considering the fact that college football games bring in 10.8 billion dollars a year, college basketball brings in 27 billion dollars a year, and not one football or basketball player sees any money made from the games they slaved over. The reason the people in charge of the NCAA will get away with what they’ve done to players for years on end is because the coaches and other staff are getting paid to shut their mouths and not speak out against the NCAA, because they need a job, these young men and women work so hard throughout their sport seasons with practices, training, conditioning, and games these students athletes need some type of pay and most of all educational help on and off the field to help them do good in school and focus on their passion. Now back to the first point made about the NCAA believing that if they partnered with universities around the world to grant every young man and woman a full scholarship to play sports for their brand and that school then they receive free benefits like a room and board, books

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

Finally, they miss countless classes because of having to travel long distances for games. The NCAA is bringing in $11 billion dollars per year from college sports. That $11 billion is more than what the National Basketball Association (NBA) and the National Hockey League (NHL) make annually (Edelman). Even

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

Annotative bibliography: Should college athletes be paid? Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is allowed to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. It is very problematic rules and many people and professional do not agree with these rules. Despite all the researches that suggested that NCAA the Universities makes multimillions dollars a year from college’s sport, the NCAA still insisting on applying the rule that no college athletes should be compensated about their effort and time.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.

Read More
2091 Words | 9 Pages

Athletes risk potentially debilitating effects to their personal lives by playing collegiate sports, according to Grand Canyon University’s article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” This problem leads to many people wondering why collegiate athletes still play sports. In the article “The Effects of Compensation for NCAA Athletes” by Mykel Kinard, he explains how the NCAA has been pocketing billions of dollars and profiting off of athletes’ NIL without allowing athletes to legally receive compensation for decades. Another reason athlete compensation is in question is because of how it’s power used to be abused. For example, in 2018, Deandre Ayton, a five-star recruit, accepted a scholarship to play at The University of Arizona.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

I don’t agree with this because the NCAA is a group just like the NBA or NFL that controls all of the athlete that are competing for honor and glory. To be apart of these groups is an honor itself. Usually while you are a college athlete the college tuition is free because you play for a sports team. These two things go hand and hand. You are not getting paid a check every two weeks but the amount of money you are saving in tuition is monstrous.

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

The NCAA has appealed.” The NCAA had one simple solution to this problem and that was to remove player images from all commercial use. This has resulted in the cancellation of popular videogames such as ‘NCAA Football’ or ‘NCAA Basketball’ and is also resulted in the removal of names from all NCAA athletic apparel sold to the public such as jerseys. To say that NCAA teams make their schools millions of dollars is an understatement. USA Today and Stanley Eitzen calculated how much money National Basketball League Hall of Fame member and former Georgetown basketball player Patrick Ewing made Georgetown during his college career.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

The debate about "should the NCAA pay the athletes?" Has recently been debated, and has been a big problem with the NCAA. First, since college football has been popular for almost 100 years. For example, a fact that said "college football started to become really popular back in the 19th century" (NCAA Paying the

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

A big issue in college sports is whether or not to pay the athletes that participate in the sporting programs. My side would be with people who think that the players should not get paid. I believe that it would affect their in game performance all together. Even if they did get paid I think most athletes would spend their money on things that would overall get them in trouble. I also think the free scholarship most get is the same as getting paid only they cannot spend their money on what they want.

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

NCAA athletics bring in $11 Billion of revenue to the company but the real controversy is the players don’t see a penny of it and can’t capitalize on their talents. Even though athletes are the ones that make it all work they don 't see any of the money that comes in because the NCAA says it’s “traditional”. The NCAA says the players get paid in free education and are the most privileged college students in America. Since the NCAA can pay for new stadiums and pay coaches million dollar contracts, even after claiming to be a non-profit organization, it’s weird they can’t pay athletes. Especially with the work they put in, the money they make for the company, and the fact that most students can’t make ends meet.

Read More
198 Words | 1 Pages

College students in general are infamous for having spending problems, as well as a majority of pro athletes so if the NCAA did entrust college athletes with money its highly likely they don’t spend it well. To speak on the two sports (football, and basketball) that would get paid the most if the NCAA were to pay student athletes: within two years of retirement 78% of former NFL players are broke or under financial distress, and for the NBA, within five years of retirement their former players were broke 60% of the time. One of the several reasons for these percentages were these athletes never had that kind of, investors misleading them into flawed investments, and the biggest problem is having to take care of their friends and family financially.

Read More

More about Summary: Injustice Case For NCAA Players

Open Document