Injustice Case for NCAA Players NCAA athletes should be compensated due to their devotion towards extra-curricular schooling along with recreational activities. In the Huffington Post, economist convey that NCAA schools can definitely afford to pay college athletes. Spokeswoman Meghan Durham asserts that only 20 of the approximate 1,100 schools which constitute the NCAA make more from sports than they spend on sports, according to association’s most recent estimates. Rodney Fort, former sports economists…exposes that the money is already there since the NCAA brought about a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year and top tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well. Opponents stated that
The players lack free will, the greatest luxury in college life. Their souls are in a binding contract, where the NCAA wrote the rules with mal intent. Many supporters of the NCAA would say their players are amateurs and therefore to keep them safe from other powers, it is best the schools do not pay them. Ordinarily, this would only be true if they treated them as amateurs in any way. The players, as previously stated, spend nearly as much time playing their sport as a job and the NCAA makes about $900 million, according to the NCAA.
College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the
an extra 50 hours a week totaling over 90 hours that 's the equivalent to working two full time jobs with a side job. if the NCAA payed their athletes it would be good for the competition. The players would spend less time worrying about finances and they would put more work in and perform better on the field and in the classroom. The athletes can 't even use their own name for profit.
I strongly believe NCAA athletes should be paid for their contribution to the NCAA. These athletes are directly responsible for the generation of revenue for the NCAA and the Universities. Head coaches garner up to seven million dollars a year and the top-tier athletes currently receive $5,000. There 's no arguing that the players contribute more to a team than the head coach. If athletes were paid more, the likelihood that more athletes would achieve their four years of eligibility with the NCAA would be higher.
College athletes should be paid because every time they play a sport they are risking career threatening injuries, they are playing a violent sport and they should get some type of payment for playing on national stage, but then i can see why they shouldn’t be paid because of the money they are getting from their scholarship and they're still in school if they were getting paid in college what will be the point of going to school and getting a education. NCAA football generates billions in revenue for schools with teams. Five athletic conferences bring in more than $250 million annually. First the NFL requires players to be at least three years removed from high school graduation before they’re to play pro ball. Ohio state university football coach, Urban meyer, recently said that collegiate coaches are overpaid He’s right , but not because his job consists of playing a
College athletes like most employees work countless hours a week, miss many school days, and put themselves at risk for injury on a daily basis, but unlike regular employees they do not receive paychecks. NCAA players are compensated for their contribution to their universities through scholarships. It is true that most scholarships cover tuition, and room and board but many fail to realize the many other expenses a college athlete may face. These players are working for a multi billion dollar industry which is exploiting them for their talents and they should be paid fairly for their contribution.
If college athletes were getting paid, more than likely other students would have to pay more in tuition and in other fees. Athletes getting paid would create the misunderstanding that getting an education would be less important than trying to get involved in a sport. The importance of academics would go straight down the drain. Along with all of these points, the majority of college athletes already technically get paid through scholarship money.
The NCAA is a nonprofit organization. Students are not professionals which most people need to know. Paying college athletes to play would ruin college sports. Another thing is there is not a fair way to pay college athletes. Paying students athletes will cause cuts elsewhere in the athletic department.
If colleges were to pay athletes there would be no fair way to distribute the money. Athletes perform their sport at different levels and for various lengths of time. In addition, not every player is able to compete or participate in a competition or game. Problems would arise about the athlete not having any playing time which would not allow him/her to receive the money he/she deserves. The first issue about this problem is that some people believe that athletes should be paid based on an open market system.
If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid
“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.
Can you imagine yourself living in a world filled with any amount of money you can imagine. One question that many people argue over and is becoming a huge debate is the question, “Are athletes overpaid?” Many people can disagree that they are getting paid a sufficient amount of money for what they do. Children are trying to replicate these athletes for what they have accomplished. Others say that they are getting way too much money for playing a game.
What college athletes don’t understand is that they are getting exposure to getting a professional contract. If that doesn’t work they will always have a college education to lean back on. They give generous scholarships to top student athletes receive, covering their tuition and most
Athletes are not getting overpaid because they need the money to pay for their health. An athlete can get hurt any time during a game, and if they don’t have money to pay the hospital bill, how are they going to get better? Not all athletes are taking advantage of their money; some athletes give their money to charities. Athletes need the money to buy a house for their family, buy food, clothes, and a lot of other things to help them. Also, they need the money to pay for their taxes and insurance.
