Case Study Opium And Empire In The Nineteenth Century

2382 Words10 Pages

Opium and Empire in the Nineteenth Century The methodology used in Case Study “Opium and Empire in the Nineteenth Century”, written by Geoffrey Jones and Alexis Gendron is specific, primarily because the authors use the flashback model of writing: throughout the entire text, they are mentioning the events of the past that have something to do with the topic they are describing, mentioning Great Britain in the Act of Union in 1707, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and some other historic events. Also, systematic style writing, where every single important point of the entire topic has its specific title and paragraph contributes to the unique writing style of authors. The types of references that authors use within this Case Study are chronological …show more content…

Considering to the fact that the Americans and French extricated extra concessions since the marking of the Treaty of Nanking, including provisions about renegotiation following twelve years, Great Britain demanded practicing its most-supported country statu" in the year 1854. That time, the British requested that China open every one of its ports to outside exchange, legitimize the importation of opium from British belonging in Burma and India, absolve British merchandise from all import obligations, and license the foundation of a full government office in Peking. For a long time, Qing court authorities slowed down, attempting to “buy“ the time. On the other hand, occasions used up their control when on October 8, 1856 authorities boarded the Chinese-enlisted, however Hong Kong-based trader vessel Arrow, which they associated with contribution in both carrying and theft. The British dealership authorities regularly contended that as a remote vessel the Arrow 's exercises did not fall under Chinese lawful purview, and that in this manner the mariners who were captured ought to be discharged under the extraterritoriality condition of the Treaty of Nanking. Having managed the transitory diversion of the Sepoy Mutiny in India, in the year 1857 Great Britain …show more content…

Under the terms of the Convention of Peking, marked by Prince Gong, sibling of the Emperor Xianfeng, on October 18th, 1860, the ports of Niuzhuang, Danshui, Hankou and Nanjing were opened to outside vessels, just like the waters of the river Yangtze, and non-native missionaries were allowed to convert. China needed to pay further reparations, this time ten million taels, to Britain and France, and another two million taels to British traders for decimation of property. At last, China ceded the port of Kowloon to Great Britain, and consented to allow the fare of contracted Chinese workers to the Americas. Ostensibly, without such an enormous infusion of shabby work the cross-country lines of the United States and Canada would not have been finished so rapidly, in such the smart manner. Then again, China 's mortification drove straightforwardly to the fall of the Manchu Dynasty and the social changes that accelerated the Boxer Rebellion of the year 1900. What started as an irreconcilable situation between English wish for benefits from the