ipl-logo

Change Of Perspectives In 12 Angry Men

591 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Different points of view in twelve angry men

In this essay I will be talking about the change of perspectives in the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie starts off with the trial of aboy who is accused of killing his father. The jury has to come togeather and make a verdict on the boys innocense. When they come together to all vote it comes out 11 to 1. Eleven people voted guilty and only 1 person voted not guilty. They all were upset and confused as to why the man had voted not guilty. The man didnt exactly think that the boy was not guilty but he didnt think that he was either. He let the men know that they should atleast talk about it because they were overall talking about someones life. As the movie goes on you can see how all the men gradually changed their votes to not guilty after having conversations about tiny details that were not mentioned in the court room. The second man to change his vote was the old man. Everyone was rude to the older man and overlooked his vote and tried to make him feel stupid about it. But he actually had a valid reason to changing his vote. He played close attention to the other old mans attire and how he walked and presented himself. He made a valid point about the …show more content…

Second to last of all the men. He was so heavy on the facts about the case and he seemed that he didnt want to change his vote. Until the old man had pointed something out. The old man relized the the other man was rubbing the bridge of his nose because of the markings that his eyeglasses had made. He pointed out that the lady that testified as a witness to the crime had the same eyemarkings and also rubbed her eyes the same way. Once he had relized that one of the other men pointed out that in the split second the lady had seen the boy stabbing his father that she wouldnt have reached over to put her glasses back on if she was glancing out of the window in bed. The mans perspective then changed and he voted not

Show More
Related
659 Words | 3 Pages

“12 Angry Men” tells the story of an 18-year-old boy who is accused of stabbing his father to death. If found guilty the boy will get the electric chair. At first 11 of the 12 jurors were convinced that the boy was guilty. However, juror number 8 has doubts about the case and wants to examine the case in more detail. Without a unanimous vote the 11 of the 12 jurors must convince juror number 8 to vote guilty.

Read More
186 Words | 1 Pages

As the play went on, Juror Eight started proving how the boy was innocent. In the end Juror Eight changed all the other juror’s minds, except for Juror Three’s. Juror Three ended up changing his vote, not because they changed his mind but because he gave into peer pressure. He still had his prejudice influenced decision, he only gave in because he didn't want it to be a hung jury. Another example, from the same play, is Juror Eight.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the old man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the old man “[ran ] to his door and [saw ] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the old man could not have done that because of his stroke.

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

This proves that he is not afraid to have a disagreement with other jurors. Moreover, he fights for justice against the other jurors’ prejudices. It is clear that the members of the jury had already made up their minds when they first walk into the

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

This is when Juror Three realizes he has been holding a personal grudge and has put all of his frustration about the situation onto the case and even the other jurors. Finally, Juror Three votes not

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

They think this is going to be a slam dunk of a case and that this child is guilty plain and simple. That is all except for Juror number eight. He's the only supporting in favor of the young man that is on trial. After the second vote do we then see that Juror number nine follows the not guilty vote. He along with Juror number eight are convinced that something does not add up and that this young

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

The eighth juror says “It’s not your boy. He’s somebody else.” The third juror thinks about it and decides “ Not guilty.” (72) He realizes that he is comparing the boy on trial with his son. He knows that is not fair and he has a reasonable doubt.

Read More
1133 Words | 5 Pages

Although 3 does change his mind in the end, he is the last to change so he is the leader for the guilty side. In the end, the reader can look at figure 1. and take away the fact that juror 8 is the main character, and that jurors 3 and 8 causes the main conflict in the

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Juror 3 was intimidating the other jurors, trying to convince them to stick with the guilty verdict. Juror 2 was guilty of self-censorship agreeing with the rest of the group to influence his decisions. The whole group began with the illusion of unanimity. According to Janis illusion of unanimity is, “the majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous.” (Psysr.org,

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

We have the coincidence that the man was murdered just when the train was passing. Due to the proximity of the house and the noise the train emits the old man could not hear anyone scream. The man also argues that fifteen seconds after hearing those words and watching the father's body fall he watched the young man running down the hall. With the help of the building's plans the jury number eight showed that it was impossible for the man to see the young man running down the hallway only 15 seconds after hearing the scream according to the distance between him and the hall.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

The character, Henry Fonda, who was juror 8, made good use of persuasive speaking skills. Whatever he had to say, he did not have anything to gain from the decision, but through this, he found ease that which the others were willing to sentence a young man to death, disturbing. Fonda was just not convinced that the boy had indeed committed the crime, thus asked that all of the jurors would just review their own evidence with supportable backing. With the information Fonda received from his fellow jurors, he discrete it, showing his place , doubting the confused minds of his fellow jurors. Fonda was a wise man and with clear though he never directly stated that the defendant was innocent, but that there could be some doubt due to the certainty

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

Juror eight held his ground and convince the men to look over all of the evidence. Juror eight brought out the files, acted out different situations and the murder scene. The men went back and forth for hours fighting about whether or not the boy was guilt of killing his father Slowly one by one the jurors changed their mind from guilty to not guilty. All but juror three changed their mind, he was the last one standing so the vote was 11-1.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

Juror 11 switched to “Not Guilty” Juror 8 questioned the second point: The elderly man claim that he heard the father falling down the floor, and he ran to the door of his apartment and the elderly man saw the boy(Defendant) running away from the the crime scene apartment to his apartment in 15 seconds Jurors 5,6,8 also think that that the elderly man second claim is not possible physical because they all know that the witness has stroke diseases, so 15 seconds is not possible for his ability to walk around the apartment Juror 8 conclude that the elderly witness assume that the person was the defendant and the witness is not actually 100% sure that that male is the boy/defendants Juror 3” He’s got to burn!

Read More

More about Change Of Perspectives In 12 Angry Men

Related Topics

Open Document