ipl-logo

Citizens United V. The Controversy Summary

837 Words4 Pages

Corporate Domination in Political Culture: An Analysis of “Dividing Citizens United: The Case v. The Controversy” by Lawrence H. Tribe Corporations have become an influential source of political financing as a result of the controversial 2010 Supreme Court ruling, which stated that corporations are protected under the First Amendment to spend unlimited sums of money in support of campaign advertisements, so long as they are not directly connected with any political candidate (Murray Digby Marziani 1). In Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission, by allowing corporations to use general treasury funds for unlimited political advocacy, the Court overturned several financial precedents, in addition to allowing for-profit corporations to conduct financial affairs in secret through the use of independent expenditures (Groonwald 1). The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court ruling represents an unjust and unpatriotic view of American politics, which has led to severe corruption through the use of electioneering communications, secret money, and independent expenditures. …show more content…

Nevertheless, while federal law dictates that political advertisers must file a disclosure report if contributions exceed $10,000, donors can easily maintain their identities nonetheless. Furthermore, donors can now easily transfer money through “intermediary nonprofits”, otherwise known as super PACs (Murray Digby Marziani 2-3). In 2010 and 2012, “70-80% of super PAC finances directly supported or opposed federal candidates, and in 2012, super PACs spent a total of $620.9 million supporting or opposing House, Senate, and presidential candidates (United States Cong. Congressional Research Service 1-3). As a result, individuals have been left unaware of the influences corporations and other groups have had on federal

Show More
Related
1445 Words | 6 Pages

Do you feel insignificant during elections? Do you worry that there is too much money in politics? Do you believe that campaigns are corrupt? All these common worries become real issues in 2010 with Citizens United v. FEC: a Supreme Court ruling that will forever be significant to elections. The Citizens United ruling "opened the door" for unrestricted campaign spending by corporations, but most importantly the case led to the formation of groups called super PACs: corporations or labor unions that have the ability to use its general treasury and unlimited donations to influence elections.

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

We’re not talking about pocket change, we are talking about millions, even billions of dollars that corporations are spending. In today's world, with all these billion dollar companies that can control almost anything they want, courts are having trouble ruling out what they can and cannot do because it is so easy to find loopholes in laws especially if there is money involved. These corporations are only buying into elections so that they can find more ways to benefit themselves. John Cole is a political cartoonist originally from New York and now living in Pennsylvania. He has not always been a political cartoonist though.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

After reading Levinson’s article, “Full Disclosure,” I became aware of how important disclosure laws actually are. Disclosure laws could provide voters with valuable information about who stands behind political candidates. Without them, many companies do not disclose their spendings to the public for the sake of their reputation. Both articles made me realize that the Citizens United decision allows our elections to be heavily influenced by the amount of money put into candidates, and I realize that campaign financing has the ability to be selfish and secretive without the right provisions of

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

During the period of the Gilded Age, the United States was controlled by the corporations owned by robber barons. Men such as Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Morgan used money to place their own foothold in the entire economic and political system of the united states. They were able to control wages, adjust prices, buy out all competition, and avoid nearly all punishment. They held their workers under them to build their business. These business’ products were such a necessity they were able to control the entire nation.

Read More
1799 Words | 8 Pages

Throughout roughly the last one hundred years of U.S. history, one significant way lawmakers have attempted to address corruption within the government has been by implementing stricter regulations on the campaign finance system, while opponents of these regulations have argued they do not prevent corruption and have characterized them as limitations on freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. From this, we see the problem is a tension between Congress’s authority to regulate and maintain fair and democratic elections and a disproportionate focus on freedom of speech. After examining current federal campaign finance laws, one would assume the United States has always had relatively weak laws in this field; however, that is not the

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

Campaign finance reform has been a hot button issue these past few decades in the United States. What makes it different from other issues? James L. Buckley says that “What distinguishes the campaign finance issue from just about every other one being debated these days is that the two sides do not divide along conventional liberal/ conservative lines.” In the Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. FEC, campaign finance reform lessened slightly.

Read More
2250 Words | 9 Pages

The Campaign Conundrum Is the United States regressing into an oligarchy in which legislative representatives side with the rich instead of their constituents? One critical component of a representative democracy is the way in which elections and campaigns are run. Campaign finance reform is a heavily debated topic that has become increasingly relevant in light of the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commision (FEC) Supreme Court decision to lift restrictions on soft money, which is money that isn’t directly connected with a campaign, in an effort to protect the First Amendment rights of unions and corporations. This decision nullified much of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. The BCRA established limits on soft money contributions,

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

(Lafer 133) Under corporate lobby groups like ALEC, legislatures and bills are introduced across the country. Basically, the committee consists of half state legislators and half corporate lobbyists, later the same corporations that are members of ALEC fund these candidates’ campaigns, and spend their own money on advertising on TV, radio, and social media. On the other hand, during the Citizens United federal decision, but until 2010 there were 22 states that had their own laws barring or limited corporate spending in politics. (Lafer 151) Following that decision, 11 states went from either mixed or Democratic rule to being wall-to-wall Republican, with the GOP in control of both houses of the legislature and the governor’s office.

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

Dating back to its inception Congress “has never been a place for paupers (Lightblau, 5).” With each change in the country, the United States Congress rarely deviated away from its long-standing tradition of having wealthy, white men heavily represented in both chambers. Individuals who were elected ranged from “plantation owners, industrialists, ex- Wall Street financiers and Internet executives (Lightblau, 5).” Research conducted shows that “the typical member of Congress is worth more than nine times the typical voter that puts them in Washington (Thompson, 2).”

Read More
855 Words | 4 Pages

At the time many believed that contributing money to parties was an natural extension of their right to the freedom of speech. While candidates believe campaign spending is the way to go some voters believe that “using money to influence elections troubles those who believe money can have a corruptive influence on candidates” The problem with campaign spending is that wealthier groups tend to spend more money on campaign finances, usually giving them the upper hand when it comes to counting votes. Having money to put toward advertisements during an election helps candidates gain more exposure and support from people that these candidates would never have a chance to meet or reach out to. To stop this problem many have suggested placing a limit on campaign spending and this sparked the on going argument of whether or not there should be a limit on campaign spending in the

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

As corporation were ruled to be people, they are allowed to influence elections and a lot of legislation that will work in their favor financially.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Interest groups in Texas are relatively powerful actors in the political process. Organized interest groups and their representatives, also known as “the lobby” participates in the policymaking and political processes in Texas. Interest groups provide critical channels for Texans to communicate their political preferences and attempt to influence government actors and their fellow

Read More
1674 Words | 7 Pages

Campaign Donations, Corruption, and Campaign Finance Legislature By Addie Political donations are commonplace in our modern society, as are corporations. These two things are rather intertwined. However, corporate campaign donations can be very bad. There is also a debate within this topic, with some believing campaign finance legislation should be strict, and some believing it should be more lax. Political donations corrupt democracy by taking power away from the people and giving it to corporations, and much legislation concerns this topic.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

“There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.

Read More
1081 Words | 5 Pages

Corporations might spend money secretly and candidates

Read More

More about Citizens United V. The Controversy Summary

Related Topics

Open Document