ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Federal Campaign Finance Reform

1799 Words8 Pages

Throughout roughly the last one hundred years of U.S. history, one significant way lawmakers have attempted to address corruption within the government has been by implementing stricter regulations on the campaign finance system, while opponents of these regulations have argued they do not prevent corruption and have characterized them as limitations on freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. From this, we see the problem is a tension between Congress’s authority to regulate and maintain fair and democratic elections and a disproportionate focus on freedom of speech.
After examining current federal campaign finance laws, one would assume the United States has always had relatively weak laws in this field; however, that is not the …show more content…

This was the first major piece of federal policy that acknowledged the dangers of big money influence on elections. The Tillman Act led to the passage of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act in 1910, which was the first major reform in federal campaign finance policy in US history. The FCPA required federal candidates to disclose financial information as well as set limits on spending for all congressional candidates (Jamie, 2014). This piece of legislation was crucial in the broader context of the federal government acknowledging the influence of money in elections; however, it was largely ineffective due to weak penalties as well as little enforcement as a result of enforcement being left in the hands of Congress (Jamie, …show more content…

United States brought the issue of placing limits on campaign spending before the Supreme Court for the first time (Jamie, 2014). In its ruling, the Supreme Court stated that Congress did not have the authority to regulate primary elections or political parties and thus, limitations on campaign spending were struck down. Despite the Newberry v. United States ruling, Congress amended the FCPA in 1925 to again include spending limits in federal elections as well as a ban on corporate contributions to federal elections. In 1941, United States v. Classic resulted in the Supreme Court upholding spending limits in federal elections. The Court stated that the constitutional right to vote did extend to primaries (Jamie, 2014).
On paper, the United States had considerably rigorous campaign finance laws, but these laws were largely ineffective because they lacked significant penalties and also lacked strict enforcement. Nevertheless, these regulations were the official law of the U.S. federal government and acknowledged the significant influence that money can have on

Show More
Related
526 Words | 3 Pages

1)Campaign Campaign is when a person who holds political offices goes to different place giving their ideas and opinions about subjects hoping to gain the favor of the people. 2)Poll Poll is something that is used to determine how much support a person in political office has. Or how much support a person in a political office has lost. 3)Reapportionment Reapportionment is when a political office person has been reappointed to their current office holding.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent the amendments from affecting the 1976 election. An array of angry individuals and political groups convinced that the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 violated their core First Amendment rights filed a law suit led by Senator James L. Buckley against Francis Valeo, the then secretary of the Senate and thus a non-voting member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC). Buckley served on behalf of many plaintiffs alleging that FECA violated the First Amendment right to freedom of speech brought the hearing to district court first followed by the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia whom upheld the law which led to the case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. The courts maintained federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. Plaintiffs also cited not only the First Amendment but the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause as well but was dismissed by the

Read More
202 Words | 1 Pages

The elections of 1824 and 1828 were the first to bring a new method of campaigning. These methods were brought to the political life in America by John Adams and Andrew Jackson. Their methods of campaigning were first spotted when Henry Clay and John Adams made an agreement to defeat Andrew Jackson. Adams was successfully elected president with the help of Henry Clay. Soon after the election, Adams was accused of making a ''corrupt bargain'', which was when Henry Clay convinced congress to elect Adams to assure his victory.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

These two laws will help the financial part of the campaigns and if these are greatly enforced it will help the corruption

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

One way that people found their way around this limit on philanthropy was to educate the public rather than directly influence the lawmakers, as the people had

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

Is Gerrymandering a Controversial Topic? Gerrymandering is a process where the ruling political party uses the map of their state to draw lines that create voting districts in favor of their party. The result of this is that it doesn’t reflect the voters political views. For about 200 years the government has used gerrymandering during political elections and it continues to be used today (King, Elizabeth) .

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

The Judiciary Act of 1801, a law that created more federal judge positions, contributed to the establishment of judicial review by becoming the first law to be overturned by the process of judicial review and because it caused Chief Justice John Marshall to lay down three principles for judicial review. To begin, the Judiciary Act of 1801 was created shortly before President John Adams left office as an attempt of the Federalist party in order to help keep as many Federalists as possible in government. Adams did this knowing that he or any of his fellow Federalists would not be elected as president. This law evoked the case Marbury vs. Madison, a case between a man who had been promised a job created by the Judiciary Act of 1801 and the secretary

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

The influence on wealthy individuals and corporations in politics and campaigns was not a new phenomenon in the early 1970s. In fact, President Theodore Roosevelt proposed reigning in campaign spending by corporations and called for transparency in campaign finances. However, it wasn't until 1971 that reform efforts were put into law with passage of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). The law, signed by Nixon shortly before the 1972 Watergate break-in, instituted disclosure requirements for federal candidates, political parties, and political action committees. However, the law lacked teeth because there was no government-level body to enforce it.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

Another major flaw inherent to the American political system is gerrymandering. The two-party system already reduces the potential ways voters to express their political interests and preferences, gerrymandering further reduces the value of votes. For the purposes of voting and elections, voting electorates are divided up into districts. How those district lines are drawn up can be dangerous for representation. Politicians can manipulate the system and redraw lines in a way where politicians can in essence, guarantee their position by packing their loyal voting base into their district and marginalize the minority party.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

Over the last decade congressional polarization has increased at alarming rates causing Washington insiders and outsiders alike to worry about the future of American politics and democracy. While Democrats and Republicans on The Hill cannot agree on much, they both acknowledge that the increasing level of polarization in Washington is crippling the entire legislative branch, thereby undermining the greatest democracy in the world. Numerous public opinion polls, over the last few years, have shown that the vast majority of the American public, regardless of party affiliation, disapproves of, and feels unrepresented by, the extremely polarized legislature (Gallup, 2016). However, year after year, despite how many Americans become disgruntled

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

America was molded by a group of individuals who felt that their voice was being drowned out by a tyrannical monarchy. After the revolution, this was resolved by creating a system that attempted to allow all people to have a say in the country’s government. The Electoral College was established as a representative way for the citizens of America to elect a leader; however, many are not satisfied with the results.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

The Texas judicial system is bifurcated, where there are two supreme courts to serve justice. While one of the “highest courts” serves justice to civil cases, the other serves justice to criminal cases. Tom Phillips, former chief justice on the Texas Supreme Court, stated “Of the ways you can elect judges, Texas has one of the worst systems” (Chammah). Judicial elections in Texas have been impacted greatly by campaign contributions from interests’ groups, PAC’s, and law firms. In addition, partisan elections and low voter knowledge has made it more facile for these interest group to lobby their way into the legislative branch, thus, spreading into the judicial branch where elections count the most.

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

Office holders cannot use their power to enrich themselves. Independent courts and commissions punish corruption, no matter who is

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

Despite the theory that Congress is a government “Of the People, By the People, For the People,” the legislative body features only a select few individuals, most of whom reign from upper levels of society. The Constitution prescribes limited barriers to becoming a Congressional representative based on age, citizenship, and residency. Because the Senate is unofficially the upper house of the two coequal houses of Congress, Constitutional restrictions for Senate candidates are higher than those of House candidates. Where House candidates must only be 25 years of age and have been a United States citizen for seven years, Senate candidates must be 30 years old and have been citizens for nine years. Candidates for both houses must reside in the state which they seek to represent.

Read More
257 Words | 2 Pages

Negative campaigning has been apart of our voting for the president since the last two elections. This has hit the American people hard with the two most prominent elections the American people have faced. I do disagree with and agree with it the use of negative campaigning throughout these elections. The logic behind these elections is sound in order to sway the voter to your direction. Though this can be a good thing for a campaign or a bad thing if you exploit the truth about your opponent from their past.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Federal Campaign Finance Reform

Related Topics

Open Document