More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of social media on the politics
The influence of social media on the politics
Social media and election influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of social media on the politics
During these few weeks democrats and Republicans Who are running for president were engaged in a battle to win the Iowa caucus. The state of Iowa hosted the first official vote of the 2016 campaign. During the Iowa caucus, different tactics and strategies were used by both parties to gain votes, through the use of persuasion ,repugnant comments, and the use of the media. The two articles I will be discussing, “ Ad Wars of 2016 Campaign Erupt in a Changing TV Arena” by Nick Corasaniti and “Attack ! why next 2 weeks could get nastier than ever” by Jennifer Jacobs.
Any statistic is prone to manipulations and error depending on the intentions of the source. For example, to increase the sale of a newspaper during an election, newspaper companies put out conclusive headlines that a candidate is leading in ballots. The journalist might reach a conclusion by assumption or by sampling few members of the community whom they voted for in the election. Subsequently, they reach an inaccurate conclusion. If ballot papers are stolen, or voters vote more than one time, data will be in error, and the wrong candidate will emerge as a winner of the election.
Damon Cann: Electronic vs. Paper Voter Guides and Citizen Knowledge Cann began his presentation by describing how political knowledge is decreasing. Specifically, only 50-percent of college students can identify the term lengths of U.S. Representatives and Senators. Cann explained that while someone can say that it is impossible to know every subject, such as chemistry, politics may be more impactful on a daily basis than chemistry. Citizen knowledge matters because it is essential in the political process. Cann theorized that a possible solution to counter a lack of political knowledge is a neutral voter guide that is typically state sponsored.
This advanced legislation would be extremely beneficial because it highlights and strengthens the best aspects of the BCRA to avoid loopholes, all while adding the additional aspects of stricter disclosure laws and an egalitarian approach to increase citizen involvement in the legislative process, and more problems can arise without the legislation. First, without the ban on soft money exchanges, donations are essentially stolen and used for a purpose they were not meant for. Currently, it is common that when a contributor donates to a political party, they may not want their donation to go to an individual candidate, but most of the time, their donation makes its way to a political campaign. Second, without the new prohibition of electioneering communications ninety days before a general election and forty-five days before a primary, voters could be manipulated into changing their votes immediately before an election. Electioneering communications use propaganda to seriously denounce a candidate’s opponent, which can shift votes and suddenly turn the election away from voting because of a candidate’s goals and ideas and turn it into a vote manipulated by propaganda.
However, ads that are meant to leave only an emotional impression upon the target audience are not beneficial and in fact can be dangerous because they may backfire. Resorting to negative campaign ads require candidates to give thoughtful consideration and careful presentation. The campaign ad in the form of the television commercial presented by candidate John Bell Edwards lacks any of the redeeming and helpful qualities of a negative
The elections of 1800 and 2016 show a similarity in the way each party attacked each other. Many people think that the 2016 presidential election was the worst for mudslinging that there has ever been. However, if we look back to the presidential election of 1800 between Jefferson and Burr, we would see very similar picture. In the 1800’s, the candidates and their political parties would use their influence with the media to spread lies and misinformation about the other candidates, just like they did in the 2016 presidential election. It seems the media of today has definitely chosen sides just like they did in the 1800’s.
Over the last few decades, the United States Congress has debated numerous campaign finance reforms. Debated proposals have included limiting independent expenditures, raising limits on individual contributions, banning all private campaign contributions, and creating a public financing campaign system. In many of the debates, compelling arguments exist for both the proponents and the opponents. Generally, arguments are predicated upon constitutional concepts, Supreme Court rulings, standard policy, logic and reason, and personal perspectives.
I think the clip about Ronald Reagan is the most effective. It showcases what Reagan has achieved as President. Rather than making promises about what he will do or attacking the other candidate the ad simply talks about how the country has improved with him leading it. No, none of the ads really crossed any lines so to speak but the “Daisy” one did come pretty close by basically saying if you voted for Goldwater then the world will die in nuclear fire, however it was a different time. As for negative ads, they can, if not executed correctly cause a backlash that can hurt the other candidate.
Many officeholders, legislators, and members of Academia argue that the supreme court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission has single-handedly destroyed American democracy as we know it. This case is one of many that, in essence, allows legalized bribery to occur within the American political system, with most large money contributions to politicians coming from sizably influential corporations. Although many elected officials believe corporate money in politics strengthens democracy, it contrarily damages democracy and is the reason campaign finance reform is the greatest issue facing American politics. Since 1976, the US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of cases like Buckley v. Valeo and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, which claims corporations are considered people; and based on First Amendment rights, people are allowed to spend their money within the political arena. Citizens United v. FEC is the supreme court decision that has led to further corruption within the American campaign finance system, while halting efforts to minimize money in politics.
This campaigning in certain states can build up a large amount of beneficial support for a candidate because it can cause them to get more elector and populous votes. However the Electoral College campaigning system has the chance to become harmful due to the person who wins the vote to not be popular all across the nation due to only campaigning in only a few spots in the country (Heuvel Par. 1). This in my opinion can cause the new president to become unpopular across the nation and can divide the country. Also this can exclude the smaller and non-swing states from the campaigns due to the other states in the nation already deciding on a
This provides important expression and guarantees that officials are responsive to voters (Yolaf,
The cause of this then leads to a wide spread impairment of the public's perception of an issue and may have an impact on political decision-making by giving the impression that a candidate or subject is supported widely. Astroturfing may also destroy public confidence in political institutions and procedures because it raises concerns about the legitimacy of political groups and the motivations of their leaders. Astroturfing diminishes the ability of voters to make informed decisions and holds their elected leaders responsible when it is let grow and produces a false picture of reality. Astroturfing ultimately devalues the public's confidence in the political system and the democratic concepts of accountability and
The Voting Rights Act was one of the most revolutionary bills ever passed by the congressional legislation in the United States. President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the bill into law on August 6th, 1965, not only as part of politics but also, a depiction of morals. Since 1965, it has protected minority voters at the polls, but it has been fifty years since the Voting Rights Act has been passed and it is still a controversial topic that is constantly debated on today. The voting rights of all minorities throughout the country are once again under attack which impacts one’s ability to exercise his or her constitutional right as a citizen.
Not only does this campaigning style diminish voter turnout, but it also causes candidates to cater their platform around what would benefit “swing” states rather than the nation as a whole. A candidate who needs Iowa’s electoral votes in order to win the election will have a platform that features ethanol subsides and agriculture-friendly policies, while a candidate’s platform who needs Florida’s votes will neglect to mention a cut in Medicare spending (Black, Minnpost). The way that candidates choose to campaign is a direct result from attempting to work the system in an effort to obtain as many electoral votes as possible, despite the
Political advertisements have played a key position of importance when selecting our political figures. Prospective politicians use all sources of media to present their official stance and opinions on issues concerning their constituents. Many politicians try to use positive messages to sway potential voters into siding with them. However, others will utilize a series of attack advertisements to push voters away from an opposing candidate. Negative campaign attacks are a necessary evil on our political battlefield.
