Nick Corasaniti And Jennifer Jacobs: Article Analysis

During these few weeks democrats and Republicans Who are running for president were engaged in a battle to win the Iowa caucus. The state of Iowa hosted the first official vote of the 2016 campaign. During the Iowa caucus, different tactics and strategies were used by both parties to gain votes, through the use of persuasion ,repugnant comments, and the use of the media. The two articles I will be discussing, “ Ad Wars of 2016 Campaign Erupt in a Changing TV Arena” by Nick Corasaniti and “Attack ! why next 2 weeks could get nastier than ever” by Jennifer Jacobs. Although both articles discuss the same thing, the author word it differently. In this essay, I intend to explore the question ‘’What makes the article by Nick Corasaniti persuasive and jennifer Jacobs’ article objective?”. In both articles, the authors Nick Corasaniti and Jennifer Jacobs quote experts who conclude their opinion regarding the actions of the candidates and the negative outcome. For example,

For example Corasanti uses persuasion and Jennifer uses objectivity to show the attitudes of the candidate. Corasanti quotes “ It's like the end of the Quentin Tarantino movie, Where everyone is shooting everyone else”. Corsiantiti quote gives more of a violent scene from a movie where everyone attacks each other. He uses this quote to reveal how candidates will react during a debate or while usings negative comments. However this quote is considered an opinion because it judges the campaign in a negative way. In the article by Jacobs she also mentions a movie scene. She states “As presidential street fighters feel their poll number wobble, could Iowa start to resemble the fight scene from “Anchorman’’? This scene is from a comedy in which Jennifer Asserts it in a ironic way instead of violent. Also she mentioned it as a question, where it led readers to think how funny the battles