Imagine seeing character from a film walking in a obscure solitary hallway where you see a vast shadow of a mole trying to devour you... this might seem cool but this is indeed one of the major differences between the City of Ember film and the Bible. If you want to have my opinion, I would assay that the Bible is a lot better than the film, some other differences are such as adding incident, speed of story and events, and characters. In the City of Ember film they had to add some events so that the motion picture wouldn't get boring.One of the events that the picture had and the Bible doesn't would be the gigantic mole because the mole had some major events such as consumption the mayor and trying to butcher Lina and Doon. Another major issue added to the movie would be when Lina and Doon were escaping ember for in the Bible it says that that Lina and Doon find a stone marked with E and then journey down some ladders into a room full of boats, and then in the film it says that the boats are the lockers that the folks that work in the pipework , and also in the book there is barely a stream with a really solid tide that takes the boats away, And then in the film there are two enormous wheels and you need to go to a concealed control room and turn off one of the enormous wheels so that the boats go.And also the minute at the conclusion of the book/film is assume to go to Ms. Murdo not Doon’s father. …show more content…
As an instance Lina wasn't suppose to find the instructions on the day of the assignment day and Lina’s granny wasn't suppose to perish the night of assignment day.Also in the film Poppy was believe to find the book that told about the Lady who was one of the first people that lived in ember. In addition The people that made the motion picture didn't mention the part where Doon watch the moth flying out of its