ipl-logo

City Trial Court Case Study

441 Words2 Pages
Did the district court have the jurisdiction to interfere in the city’s discretionary action?

This court reverses the trial court’s judgment; the trial court has no jurisdiction to interfere in the lawful discretionary act of local public officials. The trial court has limited authority to implement its judgment over a discretionary act of the city officials, unless it reviews a crime or a violation of legal compliance. The trial court also does not have the authority to specify, how a local government will implement its discretionary actions.

The fundamental basis of our system of government it’s found that the separation of powers. The city council, is the local governmental elected officials charge for the welfare of the citizens, this
Open Document