ipl-logo

Jordan V. City Of New London Case Study

692 Words3 Pages

The case of Jordan v. City of New London and Harrigan (1999) centers around Jordan bringing a civil rights action against the city and Harrington alleging that they denied him equal protection in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and Article 4, Section 20, of the Connecticut Constitution (Jordan v. City of New London, 2000). The facts as presented to the court are that Jordan and 500 other police applicants voluntarily took the applicant screening examination for being a police officer in the state Connecticut in early 1996. The testing material included the Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam (WPT), which purports to measure cognitive ability. An accompanying manual listed recommended scores for various professions and …show more content…

He made an inquiry into why he was not selected to interview and was told by assistant city manager Harrigan that he “didn’t fit the profile” (Jordan v. City of New London, 2000). Jordan assumed it was because of his age, 46 at the time, and filed a complaint with the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. The resulting response indicated it was not his age, but rather that he scored to high on the WPT and was essentially deemed over qualified and would most likely become bored and quit. The city chose to only interview applicants who scored 20-27, opposed to Jordan’s 33. Upon learning this information, Jordan filed a civil rights action against the city and assistant city …show more content…

Additionally, a body of professional literature concludes that hiring overqualified applicants leads to subsequent job dissatisfaction and turnover. While such studies have been challenged, it cannot be said that their conclusions have been refuted” (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). Lastly, the court the court further stated “The question presented is not whether a rational basis has been shown for the policy chosen by defendants. It is not for a trier to decide between two bodies of evidence in support of and in contradiction of the validity of that basis. Because defendants have shown that there is a rational basis for its policy, it cannot be found that the policy is arbitrary nor irrational. Plaintiff may have been disqualified unwisely but he was not denied equal protection” (Jordan v. City of New London,

Show More
Related
730 Words | 3 Pages

The fourteenth amendment states in the equal protection clause that states may not discriminate against any citizen for any reason, and must allow the same privileges, rights, and conservation. Hogan was on a mission to gain relief as well as compensation for the damages caused. The case was argued on March 22, 1982. The argument from Joe Hogan was proposed by advocate, Wilbur Colom. The petitioner’s side was presented by Hunter M. Gholson, in representation for Mississippi University for Women.

Read More
2294 Words | 10 Pages

The claim was made that when he was fired it was due to his race. In the case Hicks files a law suit for wrongful termination under Title VII for racial discrimination. Hicks track record with St. Mary's Honor Center before the events unfolded seen him as a contributing component of the organization. Prior to being fired, Hicks experienced issues with the new change in leadership. While employed with St. Mary's Honor Center the plaintiff

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

The court also ordered the city to pay her attorney’s fees. The city appealed the ruling based on the grounds that they were not notified of the harassing behavior until after Williamson filed an internal complaint. Specifically, the city contended it could not be held liable for any knowledge the officer’s supervisor had regarding the sexual harassing conduct. The appellant court upheld the lower court’s

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

City of New London, 1999). Robert initially thought he was being discriminated against for his age, as he was 46 (Jordan v. City of New London, 1999). After making a formal complaint, he was informed by the city that he was not being selected for interview because his WPT score was too high at 33 and the criteria for the city was to only interview those who scored between 20-27 on the WPT (Jordan v. City of New London,

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

This case between Ronald G. Sandison and Craig M. Stanley, verse Michigan High School Athletic Association centers around two high school students who believe they are being discriminated against because of their learning disability. Ronald Sandison and Craig Stanley both suffered from learning disabilities and were therefore two grades behind other students their age. Both of these students were placed in a special learning school, but by the time high school came around, they were in normal classes with everyone else. Stanley attended Grosse Pointe North High school and Sandison attended Rochester Adams High School. Sandison and Stanley both ran track and field their first three years of high school but were not allowed to run their senior year due to turning 19 before September 1st, 1994.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

Analysis of Kelo vs. New London The unpopular Supreme Court decision of Kelo vs. New London has broken many citizens trust in having secured property rights. In Kelo vs. New London, the City of New London was condemning the property of several homeowners, in order to sell the land to private developers that would use the land to make a retail condo development. The local government approved the new development in order to gain higher tax revenue and to bring more jobs to the area. Homeowners who believed that their waterfront residence was being unfairly taken contested the City’s actions in court.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Plaintiffs: Newark Fire Department employee Lomack, along with 33 other Firefighters, the Newark Firefighters Union and the Newark Fire Officers Union. Defendant: City of Newark.   The Legal Issue:

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Marina Vinnichenko Term Paper: Court Case Gong Lum v. Rice Gong Lum v. Rice (1927) stands out as the case within which the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly extended the pernicious doctrine of “separate but equal”. In this case the issue was whether the state of Mississippi was required to provide a Chinese citizen equal protection of the law under the Fourteenth Amendment when he was taxed to pay for public education but was forced to send his daughter to a school for children of color. Mаrtha Lum, the child of the plаintiff of the case, was a citizen of the United States аnd a child of immigrants from China. She enrolled in and аttended the local public consolidated high school at the age of 9, but was told midway through her first day that

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

On June 27, 1978, the Supreme Court was divided between two different viewpoints. Four justices only focused on the “Statutory issue of Title VI and found for Bakke authorizing his admission to the school, because the quota in the university’s admission program had obviously excluded Bakke because of his race” (McBride). They recognized that the University was at fault and Bakke should be admitted. The other four justices centralized on the constitutional issues, the violation of the Equal Protection Clause, and justified that the admission process of the university wasn’t intended

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

New Jersey v. T.L.O. is a Supreme Court case that made its way through the three levels of courts in 1985. The entire dilemma began one day when two girls were caught smoking in a school bathroom by a teacher. The teacher immediately took the two to the vice principal’s office, where they were questioned. One of the girls admitted to smoking, but the other, the girl known as T.L.O., denied it. The principal, Theodore Choplick, seized T.L.O.’s purse and began to rummage through it.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Powell. The Supreme Court ended up deciding that since McCleskey could not prove that purposeful discrimination which had a discriminatory effect on him existed in this specific case, there was no violation of the Constitution. Justice Powell refused to apply the statistical study in this case because of the unique circumstances and nature of the decisions that faced all juries in capital cases. Powell argued that the study that McCleskey showed would have been best if it was presented to legislative bodies and not the courts (McCleskey v. Kemp, 2017). In my opinion, I believe that this was a wrongdoing by The Supreme Court.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

This case was not just an event in history, but a strong point that supported and still supports equality to this day. People can use this case to help support their reasoning for what they believe in and why certain actions should

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

In 1891, a group of concerned young black men of New Orleans immediately formed the “Citizens’ Committee to Test the Constitutionality of the Separate Car Law.” They raised money and engaged Albion W. Tourgée, a prominent Radical Republican author and politician, as their lawyer. The poeple involved in this case are the young concerned black men the us government and the states. On May 15, 1892, the Louisiana State Supreme Court decided in favor of the Pullman Company’s claim that the Separate Car Law was unconstitutional. The importance of this case is that In 1883, the Supreme Court finally ruled that the 14th Amendment did not give Congress authority to prevent discrimination by private individuals(Plessy v.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

Question 1 on page 243 for the “Discrimination and the Interpreter for Deaf Students” case study. Think about what an interpreter’s role is. Are they supposed to paraphrase or edit/censor? If you were the person for whom the service is provided what would your expectation be? The role of an interpreter is to do your best to translate what one person is saying and repeat in a way that the other individual is able to understand.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

In view of the report in 2009; it has been laid down that judges should be diverse, from various backgrounds and life experiences to have different point of views on various legal issues. UK’s current system is the evolution product of 1,000 years and is still changing to meet the needs of the society. Although UK”s current judicial appointment is supported, several people believe that that change should be brought, current judges are selected solely on the basis of “merit”. Some argues that the system consists of white males with similar backgrounds. One would definitely mention about the 2012 case; that of the controversial selection of Jonathan Sumption to sit in the Supreme Court.

Read More

More about Jordan V. City Of New London Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document