Brown V. Board Of Education Case Analysis

759 Words4 Pages

Decades ago, children of various races could not go to school together in many locations of the United States. School districts could segregate students, legally, into different schools according to the color of their skin. The law said these separate schools had to be equal. Many schools for children that possessed color were of lesser quality than the schools for white students. To have separate schools for the black and white children became a basic rule in southern society. After the Brown vs. Board of Education case, this all changed. Once the Civil War and slavery ended, the question of African American 's freedom remained. African Americans were given their freedom from slavery but, at the same time, were not their freedom from segregation. …show more content…

These decisions also made it so job discrimination in federally funded programs were not allowed. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court announced a resolution that changed the way students went to school. At the end of the Brown v. Board of Education case, the Supreme Court said that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" (Morrison 19). Chief Justice Earl Warren said, "We conclude that in the field of public education, the doctrine of separate but equal has no place" (Somervill …show more content…

The days after the case were filled with loud, angry, determined crowds and were intensified in loneliness. Peaceful protests were applauded in some places, and others were brought with violence. Many people were hurt or even dead in the end of all of it. Students, civil rights protesters, workers, and other innocent people were beaten, hosed, jailed, and/or even killed. Even after all of those harsh struggles and events, the positives finally surfaced. The Supreme Court 's ruling changed the American Government forever. "It was therefore perhaps the single most important moment of the decade" (Tackach 9). The decision motivated citizens to reach ‘equality. It also challenged those who greatly opposed the new changes, to be more open minded. This case was not just an event in history, but a strong point that supported and still supports equality to this day. People can use this case to help support their reasoning for what they believe in and why certain actions should