ipl-logo

Diversity Of Judges In Uk Essay

762 Words4 Pages

In view of the report in 2009; it has been laid down that judges should be diverse, from various backgrounds and life experiences to have different point of views on various legal issues. UK’s current system is the evolution product of 1,000 years and is still changing to meet the needs of the society. Although UK”s current judicial appointment is supported, several people believe that that change should be brought, current judges are selected solely on the basis of “merit”. Some argues that the system consists of white males with similar backgrounds. One would definitely mention about the 2012 case; that of the controversial selection of Jonathan Sumption to sit in the Supreme Court. Mr Sumption is known to be a member of JAC and a wealthy male from Eton and Oxford. One would wonder,” what merit is based on?”. Is it the most clever one , the brilliant one or rather the one who would be beneficial to the system “.
For years many have spoken in favor of diversity in judiciary; one of the most renowned supporter is Lord Justice Etherton.The JAC is responsible for recommending candidates for judicial …show more content…

A judge has to maintain a good reputation, and conduct. For example in 2009 District Judge Margaret Short was removed for inappropriate behavior in regard to one incident. One could also mention about the Circuit Judge Bruce camphell who was removed after being found guilty of smuggling tobacco and alcohol into England. A judge should have enough experiences to help him or her to be able to hear a case; these can include teaching which mean staying in contact with law school, publications or other professional activities.
The two previous paragraphs have sum up some of the qualities needed in a judge, there are also other qualities that one can definitely consider such as intelligence, legal ability; communicate effectively their judgment which have been reached by applying the facts and legal principles to the

Show More
Related

Case Of R V Kokopenace

891 Words | 4 Pages

The Supreme Court of Canada consented to Kokopenace’s appeal. Justice Moldaver of the Supreme Court stated that although representativeness is quite a significant attribute of the jury roll, it is rather regulated to a certain extent (Pinder, 2015). The idea of representativeness does not regard every particular type of group to be

Read More

Merit Plan Pros And Cons

694 Words | 3 Pages

The appointment of judges has become clearly political. It is not uncommon to hear of candidates making statements with regards to contested political issues as well as the use of partisan language. According to (Bannon, 10) “For neutral arbiters, this heightened political temperature risks exacerbating pressures to decide cases based on political loyalty or expediency, rather than on their understanding of the law.” The selection of judges through popular election therefore suffers serious flaws since the electorate tend to base their decisions on charm instead of serious determinants. The results can be that the person elected as a judge turns out to be one who falls short of the glory of this office in terms of experience, legal training and education.

Read More

My Role In Government Case Study

345 Words | 2 Pages

The Honorable Ramona Salvarez Me: Hello Mrs. Salvarez my name is Daniel Fermin, and I wanted to know if I may ask some questions. Judge: Yes indeed Mr. Fermin you may go ahead.

Read More

Jury System DBQ Essay

515 Words | 3 Pages

A judge must meet many requirements before he/ she is able to judge in court. A judge must have a law degree, a Juris Doctorate, and a numerous amount of other tests and jobs before he/she becomes a judge. Comparing the requirements of a juror and judge, a judge is more qualified to make a fair

Read More

Texas Judicial Branch Case Study

856 Words | 4 Pages

Government Institutions in Texas Many people believe the Texas Judicial Branch needs refurbishing for the 21st century. However, the Texas Judicial Branch operates efficiently now because of the way Texas has set up its Judicial Branch and court system. The reason for this is because Texas has structured layers of courts and those layers of courts allow cases ideal time to be heard, which works efficiently and adequately for the court system.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Texas Judicial System

800 Words | 4 Pages

As was stated before it is widely known how dishonest politicians can be. If judges were to be appointed by an amoral governor the people could be left with a judge just as twisted. Many argue that the people are more aware of what goes on in daily life and how the law might affect the common people. But, many forget that our politicians reflect our choices. It makes sense that the leaders voters chose to represent them should be trusted to select our magistrates.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

462 Words | 2 Pages

When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

Read More

Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee On Fairness And Diversity

620 Words | 3 Pages

The Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee on Fairness and Diversity (n.d.) also contend that people’s views depend on their biases on whom side they will take. They may see one thing in a positive way or vice versa. In addition, the Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee on Fairness and Diversity (n.d.) provided seven ways to recognize the biases of judges in courts.

Read More

Brock Turner Case Study

465 Words | 2 Pages

A fair and unbiased court system is necessary for the legal system. The role of the court is to correct any injustice, not to compound it. When prejudice and corruption leak into the courts, what recourse do we have for eradicating them from society? Our judges must be stalwarts of integrity because the power to move our country forward or hold our country back often lies in their hands. Judge Persky had the power to bring justice to a victim, to help her and her family move forward.

Read More

Summary Of The Buffalo Creek Disaster By Gerald M. Stern

1521 Words | 7 Pages

Our legal system allows judges to make important decisions on their own, which is a huge responsibility, and if it falls into the wrong hands, there could be severe

Read More

The Constrained Court

429 Words | 2 Pages

Courts prove unsuccessful in achieving social change due to the constraints on the court’s power. Rosenburg’s assessment that courts are “an institution that is structurally challenged” demonstrates the Constrained Court view. In this view, the Court’s lack of judicial independence, inability to implement policies, and the limited nature of constitutional rights inhibit courts from producing real social reform. For activists to bring a claim to court, they must frame their goal as a right guaranteed by the constitution, leading to the courts hearing less cases (Rosenburg 11). The nature of the three branches also creates a system of checks and balances in which Congress or the executive branch can reverse a controversial decision, rendering the Court’s impact void.

Read More

Juror 8 Character Analysis

1254 Words | 6 Pages

A group of juror comprising of 12 men from diverse backgrounds began their early deliberations with 11 of ‘guilty’ and 1 of ‘not guilty’ verdicts. Juror 8 portrayed himself as a charismatic and high self-confident architect. Initially, Juror 1 who played the foreman positioned himself as self-appointed leader of the team in which has led his authority to be challenged as his leadership style lacked in drive and weak. In the contrary, Juror 8 is seen as the emergent leader considering his openness to probing conversations while remaining calm. Implying this openness to the present, it has become crucial that a good decision relies on knowledge, experience, thorough analysis and most importantly critical thinking.

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

Assess The Importance Of Diversity In The Judiciary

328 Words | 2 Pages

Michael King and Colin May emphasise the lack of understanding between BME parties and white, male judges to a have a detrimental impact on BME defendants; they criticised the lack of diversity in the judiciary and believe that “impressionistic accounts and limited empirical evidence suggest that they are more likely to be prosecuted than white people” . It is therefore plausible to assume that having a diverse judiciary across the courts will improve the satisfaction of all parties in a case; particularly, cases that involve Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic (BAME) parties. Recent evidence implies that the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 has not yet achieved the desired impact in making the judiciary more diverse however through a comparative lens the reforms have made a colossal effort to tackle the problem compared to ten years

Read More

Essay On Giving Of Reason

2498 Words | 10 Pages

The entitlement to reasons is not only an ‘indispensable part of a sound system of judicial review’, as Professor Wade described it, but also ‘a healthy discipline for all who exercise power over others’ There are two basic underlying reasons for giving reasons: first, a general objective of fairness in the decision making process. Second, the facilitating of judicial review. Furthermore, the giving of reasons acts as a defense against arbitrary decision making, the practice of partisanship in our courts and it aids hugely in the appeals process. The three main sources of a duty to give reasons (The

Read More

More about Diversity Of Judges In Uk Essay

Related Topics

Open Document