ipl-logo

Case Of R V Kokopenace

891 Words4 Pages

According to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, “Any person charged with an offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal” (Legislative Services Branch, 2017, para. 11). In the significant Canadian case R. v. Kokopenace, an Aboriginal man was tried by an unfair jury as the community where the trial took place was 25 percent First Nations, however, the jury only included 4 percent of First Nations people (Pinder, 2015). This report will summarize the major facts of the case, court’s decisions, and dissenting opinions of the judges. Clifford Kokopenace was an Aboriginal man who lived on the Grassy Narrows First Nations reserve …show more content…

The reason for Kokopenace’s appeal was that his s.11(d) right was breached as the method employed to select the jury roll failed to include the representativeness of on-reserve Aboriginals. Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states any individual charged with an offence has the right to be thought of as innocent until proven guilty and must be tried by a fair court of law (Legislative Services Branch, 2017, para. 11). The Court of Appeal for Ontario debated whether or not the province made an effort to provide Kokopenace with a fair trial such as, offering Aboriginal people the option of participating in the jury roll. The Court decided that Kokopenace’s s.11(d) right was infringed upon as well as the Province did not make a sufficient effort to offer Aboriginal people an opportunity to take part in the jury. When it came to the Supreme Court of Canada, they had an opposing view as compared to the Provincial Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada consented to Kokopenace’s appeal. Justice Moldaver of the Supreme Court stated that although representativeness is quite a significant attribute of the jury roll, it is rather regulated to a certain extent (Pinder, 2015). The idea of representativeness does not regard every particular type of group to be …show more content…

Justice Cromwell and Chief Justice McLachlin perceived this case through a distinctive approach as compared to the majority. As an alternative of viewing the trial as a whole, they decided to concentrate on the functions of the jury which include, representing the community, presenting a protective barrier against unfair/harsh laws, and performing as informative means of the criminal justice system (Pinder, 2015). Without these factors, the trial would be deemed as unfair as the jury is viewed as the foundation of the trial and every matter follows accordingly (2015 SCC 28, para. 24). Cromwell and McLachlin stated the only means of exactly determining if the province abided by section 11(d) of the Charter is to evaluate the Province’s conduct considering the situation and how they tried to recognize the problem – if any. The Justices concluded there was an appropriate link relating the Province’s manner and the absence of diverse representation of the jury as stated in the Charter (Pinder,

Show More
Related
1020 Words | 5 Pages

The outcome was hailed a victory for representative government, democracy, government accountability and fundamental human rights. However, perhaps the biggest social issue related to the case, the result was in essence a vindication of Indigenous and Aboriginal rights. Obvious social issues applied in the case, after all, societal prejudice against prisoners is what first spawned the Howard governments blanket ban of prisoners voting rights. However, Aboriginal issues were also called into question, as Indigenous Australians are incarcerated at a rate 13 times higher than that of non Indigenous Australians. The case also brought to light serious flaws relating to the system of representative and accountable government.

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

When we first learned about the death of a 22 year old Indigenous man, it was presented to us as a racial killing. However, as we acquired more knowledge about the case, it became clear that it was more complicated than we had initially thought. Without doing any personal research on the incident, it was easy to believe the hearsay that surrounded the case. Even though Gerald Stanley claimed self defense, Colten Boushie's death was unwarranted. Gerald was acquitted as a result of as you dive into the case, there is more than meets the eye, Gerald Stanley had a smart defense team, and society played a role in the ruling.

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

It can be argued that the jury was not a proper representation of his peers. Along with other factual errors surrounding Dixon’s false conviction,

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

Social and political activism in aboriginal communities Aboriginal people in Eurocentric society struggle to gain acknowledgment and fair treatment in Canada through the use of diplomatic solutions. Maria Campbell’s “Halfbreed,” sheds some light, in this autobiographical view, telling of a woman and her struggles to belong, and gain recognition as an ethnic group (metis), growing up in Saskatchewan. The article, “Defining Indigenous space,” written by Ken Coates and Greg Poelzer, brings about the nature of First Nations and federal government relations, with respect to land claims and the political implications and legal processes that go along with political struggle. The first nations land claims were permitted disallowing the development

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

First, she uses case studies to highlight how this system has personally affected people of the Indigenous community. In the case of R v Gladue, the Supreme Court did not fully consider section 718.2 (e) of the criminal code. This section requires the judge to consider all other options other than imprisonment and to pay particular attention to the circumstances of an Aboriginal offender (Irons, 2018). It is designed to improve the overrepresentation of Indigenous people in prisons and encourage judges to have a restorative approach to sentencing (Supreme Court Judgments, 1999). Chartrand also uses historical context to demonstrate how the Canadian penal system has always been rooted in colonialism.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

In 1982 the Canadian Constitution was patriated in Canada, and with it came the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a document that set out to create a just society with liberty and justice for all (3). This new constitutional document however, may not be the beacon for social justice that it has been trumped up to seem. In Joel Bakan’s book, “Just Words: Constitutional Rights and Social Wrong,” he argues that the document is inherently flawed because it is enforced through the means of conservative institutions (3). In this book review I argue that the book does an effective job critiquing the Charter. The paper will be formatted in the following way.

Read More
1857 Words | 8 Pages

Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution Background When considering the purpose of the Royal Commission on the case of Donald Marshall Jr., it can be said that this Inquiry was not just to help the one individual but rather to prevent cases with systematic racism in the criminal justice system from happening again in the future. This is done through the commission’s detailed list of the findings on how the criminal justice system failed Donald Marshall, Jr. during the course of his arrest to the time of his acquittal and their recommendations on how to remedy this for this particular case and for the future. It was in 1971 that Marshall was convicted for murder and began his ten years in prison until 1983 when he was finally

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

There are many theories that could provide an expatiation to overrepresentation of Aboriginal people in justice system. First is the culture clash theory that was purposed by the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) (1996), this theory suggests that the overrepresentation occurs when Aboriginal people’s value does not fit to justice system, due to the fact that Aboriginal people concept of justice is different than Euro-Canadian concept. An example of culture clash theory that contributes in overrepresentation of Aboriginal people is a result of non-Aboriginal people understanding the cultural norms of an Aboriginal community. An example of differences in Aboriginal community and non-Aboriginal community is that for Aboriginal

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

This trial was detrimental to the people

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

There are two key aspects in which the Charter increases equality in a society; giving the oppressed and marginalized a voice and confining the elite's agency over the population. This essay will be examining the extent to which the Charter succeeds in fulfilling these aspects, and ultimately if the charter has balanced power throughout different socio-economic classes in Canada. Having said that, the creation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms offers to some degree protection of marginalized individuals. Although, only to an extent and this essay will clearly outline these limitations. In addition, this essay will also explore how the Charter forces affirmative action even in controversial contexts.

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

“So much of history can be lost if no one tells the story – so that’s what I’m here to do. I tell the stories. This is my way of fighting for society change. ”1 In the past, the voices of the First Nations, which are now the minority, have been silenced for too long.

Read More
1076 Words | 5 Pages

The overrepresentation of Indigenous peoples in the Canadian criminal justice system is a deeply concerning issue that has garnered significant attention from academics, policymakers, and the wider public. The notion that Indigenous peoples account for more than 30% of the federal prison population, despite comprising just 5% of the Canadian population, highlights the extent to which they are disproportionately impacted by the legal system. The overrepresent of indigenous peoples in the justice system in Canada needs to be addressed through a review of the fairness, equity and effectiveness of the legislation that is currently in force, due to its lasting impacts on indigenous communities. Through examining the failures of Canada's

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

In this case the courts rebutted the presumption however they stated this is unusual. This indicates the law is fair and flexible as in exceptional cases the courts will rebut the presumption. The case of Jones v Kernott re emphasised the fact that equity should follow the law. The court stated in this case that where the court cannot infer and intention they may impute one. Lord Kerr stated this was eminently fair and Lord Collins stated that the courts are courts of law, but they are also courts of justice’.

Read More

More about Case Of R V Kokopenace

Open Document