ipl-logo

Civil Disobedience Dbq Essay

518 Words3 Pages

"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."-Socrates. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because the society is not free unless it's able to check the government. As long as the protest of the law remains peaceful it is a good thing. It is the public telling the government that they will not let them gain to much power and crush their human rights. The government and its laws are in place to protect the countries citizens.However, we still need to make sure that the people in power don't abuse it."The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it,"(Source 1). The government needs to be checked every now and again or else it will be abused. " In the 1960s, the U.S. was in desperate need for soldiers to go to Vietnam to fight for the country. They decided to make a system where 18-year-old guys were automatically put in a drawing to see who would go and fight for the country. The draft struck controversy among the public. "From the moment he [Muhammad Ali] learned of his induction, Ali stood firmly in the proud tradition of civil disobedience, saying 'just take me …show more content…

For example, Edward Snowden exposed the National Security Agency for eavesdropping on Americans and people around the world, despite the possibility of being arrested and charged with heavy crimes. " So, what did the leaks tell us? First, they confirmed that the U.S. government, without obtaining any court warrants, routinely collects the phone logs of tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of Americans, who have no links to terrorism whatsoever,"(Source 3). The question is who is truly at fault? The government for doing that or Snowden for ratting them out to the public about

Show More
Related
1013 Words | 5 Pages

And what the Supreme Court ruled in the landmark court case of Schenck v. the United States was reasonable and true. In the “Background Essay”, the authors mention John Locke and his philosophy the Social Contract. “...we contract to leave the ‘natural state’ and we give up certain natural rights in order to live in a safe, civil society.” That is Locke’s belief, and that is the most basic reason why restrictions are needed while countries are at war.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

All throughout history we have witnessed those exceptional beings whom have taken steps to better our society despite risking their lives and putting the lives of their family members at risk. Peaceful resistance and civil disobedience, as weak as it may sound can just be as powerful as the sword itself. Notably, we are fortunate enough to have had so many notable precedents where acts of peaceful resistance have successfully impacted society and made a mark in history. These remarkable figures have shown that acts of peaceful resistance can be just as significant and positively impacts a free society. Speaking in terms of today’s society, opposing laws that one believes to be unjust seems to be more effective because our citizens are aware

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

Peaceful resistance to laws has a more positive impact on a free society because it allows people to express how wrong something can be and stress the need for change. In the "Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King demonstrates how nonviolence allows those who "refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue" (King). Martin Luther King explains how effective nonviolence can be. This demonstrates how those protesting aren't causing chaos, yet are still being able to get their point across.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because it helps get people's points across, without breaking any rules. People are allowed to voice there opinion, without causing any physical harm to themselves, or anyone around them. Many equal right came about during peaceful resistances. Thomas Jefferson is an example of that. He led a revolution, and changed the lives of millions of African Americans, then and now.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

From the beginning of mankind’s recorded history, opposition to established governing bodies have always been recorded. Whether through coup d'etat or a peaceful protest, resistance to authority always causes change in some way. The United States Government changes; laws are meant to change as well. America prides itself on the history of its peaceful protests and revolutions, demonstrating positive effects on a free society. Because peaceful resistance wasn’t creating progressive change, radical disobedience was the key to change in the 1700’s during the American Revolution.

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

In 1964, Muhammad Ali, one of America’s most polarizing and famous athletes for his boxing career, was being drafted to the military. Ali fizzled the U.S. Military qualifying test in light of the fact that his written work and spelling aptitudes were below the national standard. Because of the Vietnam War spiraling down as a lost war effort, the test norms were brought down in November 1965. Ali was then ultimately eligible for the draft and was to be named into the military. He was also going to be called for an act of duty due to the lack of soldiers in Vietnam, an already unpopular war (Cassius Marsellus CLAY, Jr.).

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

A government is “an organization in a specific geographic location which is dominant in physical force”, however, it is necessary to ensure proper use of force because force is not something to be taken advantage of (SoloHQ). Physical force may only be used in the sense of disciplinary reasons within its own government. And to enforce a military draft, the government is taking advantage their power of force, by not properly using it. In addition, the use of governmental force must be supported by laws of reason (SoloHQ). The main focus of force is to protect within the country or outside of it.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

I consider civil disobedience to be an easily-ignored pillar upon which our democracy was founded. In fact we are only established as a nation now because our founding fathers engaged in civil disobedience themselves. We were in a “social contract” of sorts with Great Britain and when we felt that they had not upheld their part of the contract (they did not allow us to create courts to maintain order, or to create a navy to defend ourselves, or to sustain our economy due to an inability to trade with any other countries), Thomas Jefferson concluded that it was our not only our right, but also our duty to break away. And it was Thomas Jefferson that combined all of the works of the great thinkers before him such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from

Read More
172 Words | 1 Pages

Civil disobedience is defined as obeying a law that is believed to be morally wrong. As a case in point, the women’s suffrage. I believe the woman who chained herself to a fence outside the White House because she could not vote for the President was not immorally wrong. Does this mean that it is actually okay to intentionally disobey and go against the law? We need to become aware that sometimes the laws are made both right and unjust.

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

If American people in the past had not participated in peaceful resistance, the United States would not be the same nation as it is today. Many people argue that because the United States took so long to be created, public defiance to laws should not be encouraged. However, civil disobedience to laws often positively affects the free society in many ways. Not only has this changed the United States in the past, but even now allows for people to peacefully protest for what they think is right. Civil disobedience encourages the voice of the people to be heard: for it to be acted upon.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

Disobedience is something that can change a person in many ways or so that what Oscar Wilde thinks. The way that I have learned how to obey my parents is throughout the simply by listing and not talking back to mom and dad , or if not I would be dead by the smack of their hand. And do not get me wrong listening to them and not doing anything bad was good but at the house , so how about when you are out in the real world and you need to say something? What if we learn how to be a better person by being disobedience?

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

From the moment a baby girl is born, she is told to follow the rules and listen to the people in charge. If the girl broke the rules, she would be given a punishment. This is fine when the girl is little and she is learning manners, but in the long run, following the rules at all times does not lead to change. If it were not for many brave women who broke the rules, ignored the people in charge, and risked punishment, women would still be seen as far inferior to men. Civil disobedience has a positive impact on a free society because it sparks change and progression in that society.

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

Peaceful Resistance no matter what way you look at it, it 's still going against someone whether it involves words or actions, resistance still causes more conflict. The last 5 years we have had people say they want change through these “peaceful protest” but these peaceful protests have done nothing but turn to violent riots were theirs damage to vehicles, business families rely on destroyed, bystanders hurt, officers killed and our country torn apart. Back when Martian Luther King Jr was around and he had his Peaceful Resistance or rallies for equality, they were peaceful and brought our country together with something that needed to be changed, but the protest we’ve had the last 5 years… he would be ashamed of. Peaceful Resistance to laws does negatively impact our free society in America. First going along with what I said about there being “peaceful rallies” even though some people may be at these rallies to make a difference to support their opinion, not everyone can respect that.

Read More

More about Civil Disobedience Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document