Civil disobedience is an effective method for fighting injustice by the way it incentivizes conversation and indirectly
Disobedience has paved the way for many of the most important decisions in our history as the United States of America. In some instances, the act of disobedience resulted in a major change in history itself. A widely known example would be the events leading towards the American Revolution, where a simple band of colonists took on the entirety of the British army. The British Parliament placed many taxes, including the Stamp Act, Tea Act, and many other significant taxes on the citizens living in the city of Boston.
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. "-Socrates. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because the society is not free unless it's able to check the government. As long as the protest of the law remains peaceful it is a good thing. It is the public telling the government that they will not let them gain to much power and crush their human rights.
“That government is best which governs least”(Thoreu). Times of struggle, times of big government, and times of disagreement often lead to religious, political, and social revolutions. Thus, bringing debate, conflict, and ultimately resolutions. Civil Disobedience can often be portrayed as criminalistic or sometimes judgement falls upon those who participate. Henry Thoreau stated “I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government.”
In a free society, civil disobedience is used to nonviolently protest laws against injustices to create positive change. Change is accomplished with the best intention and through nonviolent
Martin Luther Partaking so as to k Jr., emulated Thoreau's example in demonstrations of common defiance. Sit-ins and tranquil mobilizes attracted thoughtfulness
I consider civil disobedience to be an easily-ignored pillar upon which our democracy was founded. In fact we are only established as a nation now because our founding fathers engaged in civil disobedience themselves. We were in a “social contract” of sorts with Great Britain and when we felt that they had not upheld their part of the contract (they did not allow us to create courts to maintain order, or to create a navy to defend ourselves, or to sustain our economy due to an inability to trade with any other countries), Thomas Jefferson concluded that it was our not only our right, but also our duty to break away. And it was Thomas Jefferson that combined all of the works of the great thinkers before him such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke
Civil Disobedience is an important moral responsibility of a citizen, however it should not get to the level of illegal activity under any circumstances, because great reform can be brought peacefully not violently. In the title named "On Civil Disobedience" by Mohandas K. Ghandi once said: “No country has ever become or will ever become, happy though victory in war”(Mohandas K. Gandhi , 148). Even that long ago, when war was at high, and people embraced it, he knew that the only thing war brought was death, and depression among civilians. This method of civil disobedience has only resulted into more wars, and no real solutions. The most efficient way to the be civilly disobedient is to be peaceful, but willing to stand up for your cause.
People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from
A current issue, we have today in Los Angeles, is the deportation of undocumented, hardworking people. One way civil disobedience is effective is because protesters do not use violence which means no one dies, no one gets hurt
John Wilkes Booth, the infamous assassin of President Abraham Lincoln, was noted for quoting the Latin phrase, “Sic semper tyrannis.” In this clear display of disobedience by violence, Mr. Booth clearly violated all codes of civil conduct in his attempt to serve justice as he believed was, “Ever thus to tyrants!” As time progressed, it is fortunate that society realized violence for what it truly is: an obstacle to social change. While it is necessary to acknowledge that violent disobedience is still used too often within this modern age, it is also refreshing to consider that humanity has elected civil disobedience as a dominant force of change for issues that exist today. Seeing that this is the case, it is necessary to acknowledge that
Civil Disobedience Thousands of dedicated people march the streets of a huge city, chanting repetitively about needing a change. They proudly hold vibrant signs and banners as they fight for what they believe in. Expressions of determination and hope are visibly spread across their faces. These people aren’t using weapons or violence to fight for their ideas; simply, they are using civil disobedience.
"If a law is unjust a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. " With the possible permission of the founding father Thomas Jefferson, it seems only logical to conclude that our founders had a favorable liking to civil disobedience. It is a fundamental right granted to every American citizen whether they be Jus sanguinis (citizens of the blood) or Jus soli (citizens of the soil) outlined in the first amendment of the United States Bill of Rights, "... or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. " If so outlined in our "Supreme law of the land", can we not thus argue that civil disobedience is a positive right afforded to society.
Civil Disobedience Fifty-two environmental disobedience activist were arrested in front of the white house as part of an ongoing protest called the Obama administration to reject a permit for the 1,700 mile keystone XL pipeline project which would deliver Canada tar sand oils to refineries to Texas, and rather focus on developing clean energy. The act of disobedience must be illegal, or at least be deemed illegal by powerful adversaries, and the actor must know this if it is to be considered an act of civil disobedience. Gandhi’s spiritual influence throughout India has remained undiminished; his sainthood was well established in his lifetime and accentuated by his tragic assassination by a young Hindu fanatic in 1948. The major type of
“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the
