ipl-logo

Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay

1000 Words4 Pages

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which “prohibits discrimination by privately owned places of public accommodation...” has been transgressed against by ample business owners. This may be due to segregation, anti-LGBT laws, and religious intolerance stemming from the past. Because religion and business do not mix, many religious business owners have faced backlash and legal fees. Said business owners may claim they are permitted by the constitution to refuse service. While business owners may refuse service for justifiable reasons, there are stipulations that prevent discrimination of protected classes. Under the constitution, customers do not have the right to force a business to provide a service that would violate the owner’s religion—unless …show more content…

When in court for these types of racially based offenses, many defendants will claim intolerance towards their religion. Under the first amendment of the Constitution, citizens of the United States have the right to freedom of religion. This is the amendment that business owners claim when they are caught discriminating against a protected class. The business owners are unaware, however, that this counter has stipulations that forbid refusal of service in certain situations. For example, a business owner may force an individual to remove themselves from the property if said individual is causing disturbances among other circumstances. As mentioned previously, a Muslim deli owner cannot be forced to serve pork products due to being forbidden by the Koran, for example. Additionally, in Pennsylvania, there is a law—known as the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act—in place that gives business owners the right to oust an individual with the support of reasonable cause. However, a business owner is restricted from refusing to serve a person of a protected class—despite their religious views. This circumstance is either unknown or neglected by those who defend themselves with the first amendment, which may cause many disputes. Ultimately, this defense typically does not change the odds to favor the

Show More
Related
327 Words | 2 Pages

May it please the court that the State of Louisiana violated the first and sixth amendments on the grounds of the Zeitoun vs State of Louisiana case. Zeitoun believes he was unlawfully discriminated against due to his race and religion, and imprisoned without a proper trial, kept in cruel and unusual circumstances, and his dietary restrictions were not met. Is it not stated in the first amendment that congress will make no law respecting the establishment, or prohibit the free exercise of a religion? If this is not in the amendment please correct me but I believe it is, and the government forces who put Mr. Zeitoun through much trouble and arrested him are in the wrong. Mr. Zeitoun says that he was mocked when he prayed and they said he was

Read More
1331 Words | 6 Pages

“By the mid nineties, the issue couldn’t exclude religious speakers from the list” The new look of religious cases allowed for people to go against the law of religious freedom. - pg 113 “But the stat denied a request heightened the differences between them.” The law of freedom of speech works for many terrible groups of people, making them question if they are actually doing the right thing. Support:

Read More
209 Words | 1 Pages

Our First Amendment within the United States Constitution protects our freedoms of speech, press, and assembly, which are umbrella terms for our right to protest, among others. We, as american citizens, have the right to protest whatever we choose,whether it be a television program, a new law that has been passed, or in the Snyder v. Phelps case, deceased veteran funerals. Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder’s family filed a lawsuit against the Phelps family and their followers, otherwise known as the Westboro Baptist Church, who the Snyder 's felt intentionally inflicted emotional distress whilst picketing Matthew Snyder’s funeral. The United States Supreme Court determined that speech in a public space, cannot be liable for any emotional distress,

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

This could include using your religion as an excuse to bomb a mall. The Bill of Rights ensures the Americans the right of free speech, but it also ensures that they are safe from harm caused by these freedoms. The amendments do an effective job at protecting the rights of the people when in regards to the five main freedoms. Most things are not limited in the United States, you can wear, do, say, or act

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

• According to National Archives, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the law that prohibits the all type of discriminations among U.S citizens and enhances the civil rights. The basic elements of this law: preventing discrimination on the basis of sex as well as race in hiring, promoting, and firing. • According to U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the ADEA is The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the law that prohibits employment discrimination against persons 40 years of age or older.

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

The First Amendment says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The First Amendment has been combined into the Fourteenth Amendment and relates to the states and their divisions. The first provision is called the Establishment Clause and the second is the Free Exercise Clause. This means that there is an assurance of religious freedom that has a double layer to it. Firstly, the Establishment Clause forbids laws demanding that anyone has to accept any belief or the practice of any form of worship.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

History Civil Rights Act of 1964 Civil Rights Act of 1964 ended segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The right was proposed by President John F. Kennedy and was then signed into law by Lyndon B. Johnson. Congress expanded the act and passed additional civil rights legislations, such as the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The act forbade the use of federal funds for any discriminatory program, authorized the Office of Education, to assist with school desegregation, gave extra clout to the Commission on Civil Rights and prohibited the unequal application of voting requirements. There were many people who were involved in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is hailed by many as one of the most important legislations in the American history. The act was passed into law 52 years ago under a lot of pressure and resistance from white senators and African American activists. The act, which was largely known as the “Bill of the century” was aimed at bringing equality for blacks and whites and end racial prejudice. The act was targeted to revolutionize America where blacks and whites would eat together in the same hotels and enjoy similar rights in public places without any discrimination.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

The Civil Rights Act 1964 was first proposed by John F Kennedy. Though there was strong opposition from members of Congress, it was signed into law after Kennedy’s assassination by Lyndon B. Johnson. The Civil Rights Act banned employment and discrimination and public segregation on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin. Upon signing the Civil Rights Act, Lyndon B Johnson spoke and made a speech. With this in mind, he begins by stating what the law meant.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

All freedoms should have a restriction somewhere, and this limitation should happen when one breaks a law for the purpose of a religion. Americans should have their freedoms, but safety is even more important. Harming others for the purpose of a religion is a threat to society, and can bring down the nation. It is not fair for the purpose of people to break the law just because of a religious belief, while other people get punished for breaking the law. The first amendment is a controversial topic that still gets debated today.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

In Indiana restaurants, bakeries, all sorts of businesses were able to use that law to refuse service. Stating that by gays and lesbians asking them for a paid service, if they complied it would be in violation of their religion. Since then, the law has been revised to change that particular aspect but, this law is just one example of how easy it is for state legislation to discriminate with almost no governmental

Read More
209 Words | 1 Pages

Growing up we were taught that we all have certain rights as citizens of the U.S. The Bill of Rights which includes the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution are America’s guidelines to these rights. The First Amendment give us our rights to freedom of religion and speech. This phrase “freedom of religion and speech” is a broad one, which is why we go into great detail about what it specifically covers. The establishment clause, free exercise clause, free speech, free press, and the right to protest are the liberties included.

Read More
1346 Words | 6 Pages

Religious discrimination in workplace entails an employer treating a person specifically a candidate or staff unfairly because of his or her religious beliefs. The Title VII and law protects people who have wholeheartedly held religious, ethical or moral beliefs (Eeoc.gov.). Religious discrimination can also mean treating someone differently because that person is affiliated with an individual of a distinct religion. Religious discrimination in employment, has not vanished.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Claiming that this requirement violated his rights he sued in a state court to compel issuance of his commission, but relief was denied. The State Court of Appeals affirmed, without the need for implementing legislation, and requires a declaration of a belief in God as a qualification for office. It was a unanimous decision. The Court decided that holding such a requirement places the state of Maryland firmly on the side of those people who believe in God and are willing to state their belief. The First Amendment expressly prohibits a state from taking this position.

Read More

More about Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay

Related Topics

Open Document