Civil Rights Dbq Essay

606 Words3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr.’s civil rights philosophy made more sense for the 1960’s. During the 1960’s the civil rights movement proved prominent. Through the 60’s thousands of leaders rose, but only two emerged above the rest. Those two were known as Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Both Martin and Malcom were very intelligent men but the two had totally different views on how blacks should go about gaining civil rights. Both proved to be pioneers of the movement, however it was Martins philosophy that reigned supreme. Martin was all about coming together, and believed that violence wasn’t the answer. He also knew that there was no other way which is why he fought so hard to gain peaceful supporters. First off Martin understood that violence wasn’t the answer to the black man’s problems. “Violence may murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder.” (Doc J) He recognized that all violence does is “multiply evil.” (Doc J) that is violence’s biggest problem, it just multiplies “It is always a descending spiral leading nowhere.” (Doc J) This is why Martins philosophy made more sense. Peace doesn’t lead …show more content…

If what you’re working for is equality but you don’t want to work with who you want that equality from how can you expect to be given this? Working with whites to get what you want from them is like having a guy on the “inside”, and plus it makes it a whole lot easier when the enemy is on your team just as much as they are on theirs. “Let us march on segregated schools until every vestige of segregation and inferior education becomes a thing of the past and Negroes and whites study side by side in the socially healing context of the classroom….” (Doc D) In order to make racism disappear we must not teach our kids nothing of it. We must let all of our children, black and white grow up together and in turn they will learn to love each other as equal and not