ipl-logo

Civil War Dbq

471 Words2 Pages

In 1854, violence erupted in Kansas when The Kansas-Nebraska act was put in place. It stated that the Kansans could choose whether to be a free state or a slave state. In turn, border ruffians flooded into Kansas to decide. Obviously, no one agreed, so The people fought. The Kansans did in fact effectively set the spark for the Civil War. There was a conflict between the states when the new territory Kansas went against the Missouri Compromise. The Compromise stated that There could be no slavery beyond the latitude of 36 degrees and 30 degrees. In 1854 Kansas broke out into a fight under the doctrine of popular sovereignty which means the people of Kansas can choose if they want to be a free state or a slave state. Under those terms, Pro-slavery parties and Antislavery parties clashed for whether Kansas becomes the state of the South or of the …show more content…

Although the raid itself failed, it actually was a success for John Brown because it set off the spark for the civil war ("From the Kansas-Nebraska"). When slavery was outlawed, by the emancipation proclamation, South’s economy plummeted and this was an expert maneuver by Lincoln because It made the South go into defence mode and it prohibited foreign help because other countries thought of the South as freedom-fighters being held hostage by the North but now, they were considered a slave country. Lincoln needed the British opinion, who, ideologically opposed slavery so Lincoln effectively isolated The South and The British now supported them.("Bleeding Kansas"). The main event of Bleeding Kansas, Bleeding Kansas was a small civil-war fought between proslavery and antislavery settlers which lead up to the civil war.("Bleeding Kansas") . It was a period of violence during the settling of the territory Kansas.("Bleeding

Open Document