Class Structures In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

679 Words3 Pages

The universal break between class structures was seen as the industrial revolution continued in society. The Communist Manifesto highlighted the dissimilarities between the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. Marx explained how the bourgeois people were only concerned with creating a capitalist society by ways of production. These people were capitalist who owned factories, monitored the trade and the products being created in factories. This idea shows how capitalism solely promotes excess and greed. On the flip side the proletariats, an oppressed group of people, are treated badly by the middle class and earn just enough to survive in life without having the opportunity to obtain a higher class status. Thus, the proletariats were helping capitalism grow faster by improving the production in society. They were not receiving …show more content…

Marx would argue that Christianity promotes greed and excess however, I personally do not believe so based on my own strong biblical beliefs. In some defense, Marx is probably hostile towards Christianity based off of a poor experience with his church and the oppression of the lower class during his century in Europe. As stated earlier in his Manifesto, he condemned social injustice because of the capitalistic government. He had offered that a utopian society would result naturally if capitalism was removed. Nonetheless, the Bible teaches that “it is the love of money that is the root of all evil” (1 Timothy 6:10). Also In the book of James it says that human issues lies in an innate selfishness. This damaged nature is not aided by a type of government but only removed by a spiritual realization of Jesus’s death and resurrection. Thus, Marx might believe that answers are found in a government, whereas Christianity instructs that answers are found in Christ. Thus, Christianity does not promote greed and despair but rather it warns humanity of the consequences of