ipl-logo

Coker V. Corker Case Brief Essay

665 Words3 Pages

On September 2, 1974, Ehrlich A. Coker a convicted rapist, murderer, and overall felon that had been previously sentenced to three (3) life sentences plus 20 years, as well as an eight (8) year prison term had managed to escape. While on the run, Coker entered the residence of Elnita and Allen Carver without permission and threatened the couple. Mr. Coker proceeded to tie up Mr. Carver, steal Mrs. Carver’s money and car keys. Mrs. Carver was subsequently raped and kidnapped by Coker. It was upon Mr. Carver managing to free himself that he was then able to notify police of the events that had taken place. Shortly after, Coker was located and Mrs. Carver was found uninjured.
Coker was then charged with the new offenses of rape, kidnapping, escape, armed robbery and theft of a motor vehicle. After the case had been taken to trial, Coker was found guilty and his attempt to plea insanity fell short. During Coker’s sentencing hearing the jury found that the defendant should be put to death by …show more content…

The question then asked before the justices was whether or not capital punishment for the crime of rape was “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment. The Court found that the death penalty was not invariably cruel and unusual punishment when referencing the Eighth Amendment. However, in the case of Coker v. Georgia the Court did find that the sentence of death was grossly disproportionate and is an excessive punishment for the crime; therefore, it is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment as cruel and unusual punishment (Brody & Acker, 2010, p. 55). At the time of the case in question, the majority of States had ever authorized the use of death for the offense of rape (Brody & Acker, 2010, p. 55). In the case of Furman v. George, under that ruling most of the capital punishment statues in the United States had become invalidated, including rape

Show More
Related
280 Words | 2 Pages

Klopfer vs North Carolina In 1967, Peter Klopfer, was an African-American biology professor at the University of Duke in North Carolina. One evening, he was present at a nonviolent sit in; which lead to his arrest later on for trespassing. This incident lead him all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court on March 13.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Kendall. The Respondent was Troy leon Georgia his solicitor was B. Gean Grindle Jr. They were all from Georgia. On the night of September 2, 1974 Coker escaped out of the top of a building where a meeting was being held. After he escaped he wound up at the house of Elnita and Allan Carver’s house, he let himself in.

Read More
1910 Words | 8 Pages

In Hazelwood East High School in St. Louis, Missouri Journalism Ⅱ students produced a newspaper. In which the principal deemed two pages infelicitous. In order to ensure the publication of the school paper on time, the principal deleted those two pages. Upon the delivery of the paper at the end of the year, Cathy Kuhlmeier filed a lawsuit in January 1984. The Supreme Court case of Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier was a dispute involving the Journalism Ⅱ staff members in Hazelwood East High School in St. Louis versus the school board over the deletion of their hard worked two pages.

Read More
1394 Words | 6 Pages

Case Brief Case Information The United States Supreme Court decided Missouri v. Galin E. Frye on March 21, 2012. Case Facts In August of 2007, defendant Galin E. Frye was charged with driving with a revoked license; he had already been convicted three times for the same offense and Missouri charged him with a class D felony, which carries a maximum prison term of four years.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

Kaelea Tullly Moran v. Burbine Case When detained by the Police in Cranston, Rhode Island for breaking and entering Brian Burine was immediately given his Miranda Rights and he denied his right to a lawyer. Though the entire process the piece seemed to have obtained evidence they Mr. Burbine had committed a murder in near by providence Rhode Island. He confessed to the breaking and entering and tot the murder when he waved his rights. Because Mr. Burbine’s sister knew he had an appointment with a certain lawyer she called his office but he specifically was not available but his partner was.

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

The court case of State of Nebraska v. Gary E. Heitman deals with the conviction of Heitman on charges of criminal conspiracy to commit first degree sexual assault on a minor. “Heitman contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict and that he was entrapped” (Heitman p.1) while the court concluded that “there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction” (Heitman p.1) and “further determined that the district court was not clearly wrong in finding that Heitman was predisposed to commit the crime and that thus, the district court was correct in rejecting his entrapment defense.” (Heitman p.1). I agree with the court’s rejection of the entrapment defense based upon things discussed in other entrapment cases and ideas brought up by

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

2. Predicate Acts The De Sole and Howard Plaintiffs have alleged predicate acts of mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343. In addition, Howard alleges false labeling of visual art, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2318, as a predicate act. Hammer argues, however, that Plaintiffs have not alleged that Hammer committed a predicate act and, in particular, have not alleged that "Hammer used the mail or the wires for the purpose of executing the alleged scheme."

Read More
2888 Words | 12 Pages

In the case Roper v. Simmons three friends Christopher Simmons 17, Charles Benjamin 15, and John Tessmer 16 decided to rob Shirley Crook 46 on September 9, 1993. As the time came, two of the three decided to go through with the robbery but John Tessmer decided that this was not for him and backed out. After that moment Christopher Simmons and Charles Benjamin went through with the crime. Then at 2 am the two boys Christopher Simmons and Charles Benjamin met up to commit the crime. They then went into the home Shirley Crook was currently residing in.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Court case Coker v. Georgia was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court on June 29, 1977. Erlich Anthony Coker committed the crime of escaping from prison, breaking into a house, committing armed robbery against the residents of the house, rape and kidnapping of the women inside the house, and stealing the residents car. Before Coker escaped prison he was serving a sentence for murder, rape, kidnapping, and aggravated assault. Coker escaped from prison and broke into the home of Elnita and Allen Carver, he then threatened the Carvers, tied up Allen Carver in the bathroom. He proceeded to the kitchen to get a knife then took money and the keys to the Carver's car.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

In the cases of ‘Coker V. Georgia’ and ‘Kennedy V. Louisiana’ a very important question was brought up; does the death penalty constitute for cruel and unusual punishment in regards to the rape of an adult woman or child? Most people can attest to rape being one of the most egregious criminal acts, but how do we keep a fair punishment, and not lose sight of the reasoning in our eighth amendment in such cases? Case Information In the case of Coker V. Georgia, a man by the name of Ehrlich Coker, who was already imprisoned for multiple cases of rape among many other offenses, escaped prison and raped again along with several other unsavory acts. He was sentenced to death for his post-escape rape.

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: INSIDE THE DECRIMINALIZATION OF SODOMY The 14th Amendment guarantees equal treatment under the law, and it also ensures that the government should not deprive its citizens of life, liberty or property without due process. It is an important amendment, but a few questions still remain. Where do we draw the line of a law meeting or contravening the amendment?

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

The most important issue that must be addressed in this case is the principle of the “evolving standards of decency” and the uses of a national consensus. The “evolving standards of decency” were developed by Trop v. Dulles and have been implemented in one way or another in all of the precedents dealing with “cruel and unusual” punishment. It is important to treat these principles as an important aspect of “cruel and unusual” punishment jurisprudence, therefore turning from these set of principles would be foolish and a disregard for every precedent. However, it is important to acknowledge that each case satisfies the standards by using a different method; some use the presence or lack of state legislature as a judgment of consensus while others look at foreign countries.

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

But are we in the future to be prevented from inflicting these punishments because they are cruel? If a more lenient mode of correcting vice and deterring others from the commission of it would be invented, it would be very prudent in the Legislature to adopt it; but until we have some security that this will be done, we ought not to be restrained from making necessary laws by any declaration of this kind’ “ (Bomboy). In other words, Livermore was arguing that all citizens who commit horrible crime do deserve severe punishments for the crimes that they commit, and until the government figures out a way to place restrictions and guidelines on the penalties that we believe are morally proper to give, then they cannot hold back from reprimanding those citizens. Consequently, The Founding Fathers created the Eighth Amendment to be intended for further generations to interpret the meaning of “cruel” and “unusual” over time (Donnell). The amendment was then ratified in 1791 nevertheless, the Eighth Amendment and the death penalty is still highly debated today because the differences in interpretations

Read More
1467 Words | 6 Pages

The question of whether death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishments and thereby violates the provisions contained in the Eighth Amendment is talked about a lot. The purpose of the death penalty is deterrence of heinous crimes. ... Hence when the perpetrator of a heinous crime is put to death by the State, there is a sense of 'justice' being done and that the survivors can get

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court heard him out and came to a decision that capital punishment is cruel and unusual punishment which also violated the 8th amendment as well (YouTube.com). There was also no uniform criteria which is “a consistent standard by which things can be measured.” Eventually, Furman avoided the death penalty. But 4 years later, The Supreme Court Case, Gregg v. Georgia, came into play. Two friends, Troy Gregg and Floyd Allen, decided to hitchhike in Florida.

Read More

More about Coker V. Corker Case Brief Essay

Related Topics

Open Document