ipl-logo

Comcast And Time Warner Monopolies

1046 Words5 Pages

The article I chose to present has to do with monopolies, more specifically the natural monopoly that is formed by the cable companies in the United States.

Summary:

This article is about how the Comcast and Time Warner cable companies were set to merge and Comcast withdrew from the deal due to opposition from the FCC.

Analysis:

First off, we can see from this article that the government has to step in to regulate the monopolies that cable companies hold because without government intervention the companies could charge as high of prices as they want. Not saying they would because even though they have a monopoly, there is still a chance that they would lose customers if the prices are too high.

The services offered by cable …show more content…

He also said that the merger would have “posed unacceptable risk to competition and innovation” and that it would have limited the ability of online video sources to reach their consumers. The most significant part about this to me is that the market is changing. I myself was sick of paying $130 a month for cable and internet so I went to basic cable (it was included for free) and turbo wifi internet for half the price. I also went to HuluPlus and Netflix. It makes me wonder what they mean by limiting the ability of these outlets to reach their consumers. If they restricted my access to these sources then I would maybe be forced to pay more for cable again, I wouldn’t have a choice. Also, Wheeler had talked about the ownership of programming interests. This is a major part of why the merger failed in my opinion. Both companies already own quite a few of the networks that they carry and this is how they can further monopolize the market. Affiliate fees. These are fees that cable companies pay to programming providers on a per subscriber basis for content that they then repackage and sell to consumers. (for more info: http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-the-tv-business-actually-works-and-why-its-going-to-take-longer-than-you-think-to-disrupt-it-2010-4) If you own the companies that provide the content as well as being the ones distributing it, then you can lower your variable costs and then also bring in revenue from either charging other companies for the content or you can prevent other companies from having your content available so that if a consumer wants a certain channel they have to subscribe to you to get it. A move like that is what I think that the FCC fears the

Show More
Related
413 Words | 2 Pages

Comcast-NBC Universal on the other hand, is the fusion of three distinct organizations; Comcast Cable (founded in 1963), the National Broadcasting Company (founded in 1939) and Universal Pictures (founded in 1912), who were formed into a singular corporation in April 2013. Much like its rival corporation Disney, Comcast-NBC Universal is divided into similar divisions including television, theme parks and resorts and motion pictures. In contrast to Disney, Comcast-NBC Universal seeks to aim beyond the mainstream family market and creates media which appeals to all demographics. Examples of this include their animation division, Illumination Entertainment producing kid-friendly hits such as Despicable Me, their theme parks which gravitate towards families with older children and NBC’s primetime

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

These other companies have a wider variety of movies that Redbox, making them more favorable by the consumer. Additionally, a plus for Redbox is that these other companies require cellular data or internet service to make them accessible, while Redbox does not. In a growing economy, in order to keep up with competitors, Redbox will have to maintain low prices on all of their movies and games. Them doing this will make the other competitors second best, because of the convenience of Redbox locations and easy access.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

The major risks in the Redbox start-up that prevented venture capitalist from investing in the company was the fear of no profit and advantage to their business. The businesses were afraid that the Redbox wouldn’t grow their revenue and profits, while making a profit for Redbox. Competition from other providers, including those using other distribution channels, having more experience, better financing, and better relationships with those in the movie industry, than Redbox has, including traditional video retailers like Blockbuster, online retailers like Netflix, other retailers like Wal-Mart, pay-per-view, cable or satellite and similar movie content providers like Time Warner, and other forms of movie content providers like computer download sites. Changes in the sequential timing of when movie content is provided to the various movie content distribution channels; for example, studios may change, shorten or discontinue altogether the period they have historically provided between the time movie content is provided to more traditional video retailers usually directly after theatrical release and to other movie content providers such as pay-per-view, cable or satellite and computer download providers will usually only after a significant period of time following distribution to the more traditional video retailers, usually one month or longer. Changes in consumer content delivery preferences and increased

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

Monopolies in the 1900’s had immense powers in the market, and were able to have complete control because they had such power. A monopoly is the “exclusive control of commodity, market or means of production” where the “power is concentrated in the hands of a select few” (Beattie). While monopolies do get jobs done and inquire a large amount of money, their success it at the expense of the people and the power they have obtained is abused. They started off liked by small businesses because it helped with shipping costs, but eventually monopolies became too powerful. They are more hurtful to the public than helpful, and the benefits they gain from being a monopoly hurts the public, making them a collective dilemma.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

Monopolies: The Trailblazers of America The second industrial revolution, spanning from the late 1800s to the early 1900s, was distinguished by rapid industrialization, economic upheaval, and the development of large monopolies. Small groups had total control of these monopolies and varied from many industries, the most well-known being oil, steel, and railroads. Although these monopolies had their faults, they have left a legacy on the American nation that has influenced almost every aspect of the United States today. These benefits include the growth of infrastructure on a national scale, the advancement of technology and innovation, and the cultivation of new business practices.

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

Just because the owner of the companies profited from monopolies doesn’t mean that everyone else did. The owner of the business can increase gas prices as high as they want if they own all the gas companies in that area. People most likely wouldn’t drive out of their way just to get cheaper gas, so they are stuck paying a lot for gas. The owners would normally try to keep their gas prices lower than those around them so more people would buy from them but when you take out the competition they can raise the prices and get more money than before. On the other hand, people that might argue that the government shouldn’t break up Standard Oil’s monopoly say things like, “If they worked to get there, than they deserve it, and if they don’t go crazy on prices, then its okay”

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

Stream TV is zero-rated for Comcast customers. This should be a violation of network neutrality, because Comcast’s own Internet TV is zero-rated, but similar services like Netflix, are not. AT&T has a similar program, and Verizon is planning on releasing their own. AT&T and Verizon’s zero-rated programs allow companies to pay for their websites or software to not count against the customer’s data cap. These zero-rated programs are clearly threatening to the main principles of net

Read More
1405 Words | 6 Pages

Netflix now has less users and is making less money, and would thusly have to increase the price of their subscriptions to compensate for this. Overall this translates to disastrous costs for consumers and the transformation of everyday online services into expensive

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

The freedoms that are hindered by these entities are the freedom to enter or not enter into a particular transaction by denying them any alternative and the freedom to not be affected by transactions in which you do not partake (Friedman, 1975). A monopoly deprives the consumer of the freedom of exchange; the consumer is forced to transact with a sole seller. Monopolies themselves come in different forms and deciding which monopoly will do less harm to the people, the monopolies need to be studied on a case-by-case basis. Most monopolies can be dealt with anti-trust laws to prevent them from coming to existence. Furthermore some monopolies need the government to stop supporting them in order to terminate its existence.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

Government policies and antitrust laws are effective tools against both monopoly and oligopoly in markets. They encourage competition, level the playing field for firms, and protect consumers from exploitation and unfair pricing. Antitrust laws, for example, prohibit corporations from restricting competition and demand that all firms competing in a market are provided with equal opportunities. They also prevent the formation of cartels, collusive agreements, and other forms of anti-competitive practices. Governments can also employ antitrust laws to block mergers and acquisitions that could create a monopoly or oligopoly.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, the monopolies got rid of the competition so there was no competitive price point. This was not fair for the commoner because the businesses could change the cost of their products and people would have to pay what they charged. The United States has tried to remove all of the monopolies starting with President Theodore Roosevelt. Today there are practically no monopolies in the United States, but in two-thousand four Microsoft was sued for a monopoly of their product Microsoft Word, this was a very rare

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

With the FCC’s attempt to repeal net neutrality,

Read More
853 Words | 4 Pages

He argues that the antitrust laws have been hijacked. The villain is Robert Bork and the Chicago school, which espouse a minimal role for antitrust. The Chicago School’s fundamental question for antitrust action on monopolization or merger analysis is whether a corporation increased its prices or decreased quantities. If neither occurred then, under Borkian analysis, acquiring firm not capable of monopolization or obtaining a monopoly and the government should pass on the merger.

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The two firms combined will be the country’s dominant cable and Internet provider. Cohen’s rebuttal to the negative feedback of this news was that Comcast already has competition to worry about such as Amazon, Netflix, and Apple. Cohen is right to the extent that these corporations are giving Comcast some form of competition. But the competition isn’t remotely as effective as having a newly merged company with control of roughly 40 percent of the high-speed broadband Internet market. Cohen mentioned 3 companies that don’t even dabble in the cable business at the current time.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Perhaps Cook understood how working people trying to catch up with the movies they missed because additional shift, he steered Blockbuster to a store that operated until late than other video chains. Also, Cook occupied Blockbuster with more than 8,000 VHS tapes, made it three times larger than its nearby competitors. Not only Blockbuster lead in the diverse movies, it also did not follow its rivals by stacking the tapes behind counter. Cook display the tapes up at the racks as well provide the catalogue of movie list. The next year after Blockbuster opening, they had managed to join the Nasdaq under ticker “BBEC”.

Read More

More about Comcast And Time Warner Monopolies

Related Topics

Open Document