I: CM guided client through ISP goals. CM inquired about client’s upcoming LAMP VASH appointments. CM discussed and encouraged client to get his driver’s license. CM praised client for being honest regarding drug use but also encourage sobriety. CM administered Beck Depression Inventory and review results.
Harte- Hanks Communications v. Connaughton, which took place in 1989, focused around libel laws as well redefining the actual malice standard. Six years prior to the case, Daniel Connaughton ran for Municipal Judge of Hamilton, Ohio, losing to the incumbent James Dolan. Connaughton was ultimately unsuccessful, losing to Dolan, who was supported by JournalNews, a local Ohio paper. It later was revealed that prior to the election, a member of Dolan’s staff resigned his position and was charged with perjury, by a jury.
Have you ever asked your mom if she’ll take you to this movie and she said no I don’t like stuff like that? That may be because having so many options and channels to watch divides audiences, maybe only boys like that movie or maybe only girls like that movie all because of there being so may channels and things to watch. If there was only three channels on your TV would you and your family watch TV together more often? Probably yes, because that is all there is to watch.
Mr. Myers, I appreciate you taking the time to stop in and wish me well. Please do not feel as if my decision to resign is a reflection of your leadership. I whole heartily believe that you are a great leader and a breath of fresh air for this organization. Resigning was a difficult decision for me…. Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union is a great company!
Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman
The Overuse of Television Kameron G Loyd BYU-Idaho During an average week, how much television does the average child watch? Parents, educators, and concerned citizens alike would be appalled at the answer of 1,480 minutes (BLS American Time Use Survey, A.C. Nielsen Co.). They would also be revolted by the statistic that 54% of four to six year olds would rather spend time watching television instead of spending time with their fathers (BLS American Time Use Survey, A.C. Nielsen Co.). In 1984, Neil Postman saw how devastating television watching was becoming to the culture of America, and gave a speech to the literary community at the 1984 Frankfort Germany Book Fair entitled “Amusing Ourselves to Death” which deals directly with this monolithic issue. Although the speech and subsequent article, published in Et Cetra, were directed at the publishers, writers, illustrators, etc., all those who read this article can also benefit from Postman’s overarching desire to decrease the hours of mind-numbing television watching.
I think of Lt. Jimmy Cross as a young man who wasn’t prepared to leave his loved ones to fight in a war. He left his normal life filled with regrets of not doing “something brave” (5). His young adult life was taken from him by the war. He had to experience things that no normal twenty four year old man would have to. He wanted to be in love with a girl and have her love him back.
This makes cover songs possible without entirely compromising the rights of the composer, artist, and producer of the original song. Lessig delineates the pattern between this ruling and the decision Congress made decades later regarding television; like with radio stations, cable networks would be required to pay a fixed
In the simplest of terms: the FCC rules mean no fast and slow lanes on the internet, no blocking of content, and no provider throttling your streaming video just because it can. (Hong) The only reason he could be against this is if he wanted to make money off of it. It is hard to fathom that someone would be against an internet where you are protected from getting exploited by the
Shant Sahakian, in the informative and opinionated piece, “Repeal of Net Neutrality is bad for Education, Business, and You,” written in Los Angeles Times, on November 30, 2017, argues that repealing, therefore ending net neutrality would be detrimental and “the end of the internet we have always known and loved”, and that ending net neutrality will be bad for education, business, and anyone who believes that the internet should be free and equal to use by all persons who use it today. Sahakian’s evidence consists of various references and indications to the fact that ending net neutrality will be the end to internet freedom and equality as wells as an end to the fairness and equal opportunity that net neutrality gives us today. Sahakian also
For example, let's say that a large search engine corporation had a lot of spare money in the bank from advertising, and it decided to pay ISP's to give their traffic preferential treatment over a different website, such as a non profit like Wikipedia. That situation would not be fair in my mind, because a corporation uses its power to disproportionately gain an advantage in performance that is not justifiable. A core principle of the internet is being allowed to exercise one's freedom of speech. There should be no reason that someone who is acting within their constitutional right should be denied the opportunity to share their viewpoint in any way that they choose (2).
In today’s society, media is easily accessible with the click of a single button. There are a variety of shows and movies. There’s an unlimited source
On December 14th, the future of the internet will be determined. The Federal Communications Commission will vote to repeal the Open Internet Act, which allows for net neutrality. Net neutrality forces internet service providers, such as Verizon or SELCO, to provide access equal access to all websites. Proponents of net neutrality believe that it allows for smaller companies to complete, while opponents believe that it makes it harder for larger companies to further expand their networks, which would in turn improve the internet. A repeal of the act would theoretically allow internet service providers to limit or remove your access to certain websites—unless you paid extra.
They can charge extra fees to the few content companies that can afford to pay for preferential treatment — relegating everyone else to a slower tier of service.” Network neutrality means applying well-established “common carrier” rules to the internet in order to preserve its freedom and openness. Common carriage prohibits the owner of a network that holds itself out to all-comers from discriminating against information by halting, slowing, or otherwise tampering with the transfer of any data (except for legitimate network management purposes such as easing congestion or blocking spam). History: Have we always had Net Neutrality?
Product Pricing Netflix Inc. The sources of revenue for Netflix mainly includes domestic (U.S) and international streaming subscriptions and domestic DVD-by-mail subscription services. Netflix follows a differential pricing strategy based on the number of screens the content can be streamed from a single account.